  sturmvogel Obama '08
join:2008-02-07 Houston, TX
| reply to espaeth Re: WOW! Comcast cut off Dave Winer ... again
said by espaeth :said by sturmvogel :Great that non-employees can see usage reports. To be clear, he was showing me the output of raw "show counters" data off the CMTS. There is absolutely no customer identifiable data to be gleamed from that output. Had an NDA signed ? -- Treason is a matter of dates |
|
  funchords Hello Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
| reply to Rob said by Rob :Comcast has already made it very clear that you are not paying for unlimited Internet access. Nowhere on their website does it advertise as unlimited. With respect, Rob, other than drop the word unlimited from their advertising, Comcast has done NOTHING AT ALL to make it clear that the service has limits.
One would think that "making it very clear" that the service has limits would involve actually stating the limits in the pre-sale offering. -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...
|
|
  espaeth Digital Plumber Premium,MVM join:2001-04-21 Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq
| reply to sturmvogel
said by sturmvogel :Had an NDA signed ? Why would there need to be an NDA?
The output looks like this:
|
|
  sturmvogel Obama '08
join:2008-02-07 Houston, TX
1 edit | said by espaeth :said by sturmvogel :Had an NDA signed ? Why would there need to be an NDA? Because these are usage logs and/or counters off private company network devices. Maybe instead of harassing users the Customer Security Assurance group should look at who has access to the network nodes, in order, you know, to protect customer security. Not very assuring.
In general an NDA should be signed if a non-employee will have access to such info. If none was signed, then it is a breach of security due to social networking methods. If one was signed and information disclosed in a public forum, well, it is a breach of the NDA.
-- Treason is a matter of dates |
|
  espaeth Digital Plumber Premium,MVM join:2001-04-21 Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq
1 edit | said by sturmvogel :Because these are usage logs and/or counters off private company network devices. Maybe instead of harassing users the Customer Security Assurance group should look at who has access to the network nodes, in order, you know, to protect customer security. Not very assuring. I think you're missing the point. The output I pasted is just an example from here . I didn't get to see any part of the billing / provisioning system, I didn't get to make any kind of record of the numbers (other than a mental recollection), and at no time was I given control of the device. (when I said "I had to page down" the literal translation is "the Charter engineer had to hit the space bar a few times to scroll through the attached channels")
There's no possible way for me as a 3rd party to attribute the values back to specific customers. |
|
  sturmvogel Obama '08
join:2008-02-07 Houston, TX
| reply to espaeth Re: WOW! Comcast cut off Dave Winer ... again
said by espaeth :said by sturmvogel :Because these are usage logs and/or counters off private company network devices. Maybe instead of harassing users the Customer Security Assurance group should look at who has access to the network nodes, in order, you know, to protect customer security. Not very assuring. I think you're missing the point. The output I pasted is just an example from here . I didn't get to see any part of the billing / provisioning system, I didn't get to make any kind of record of the numbers (other than a mental recollection), and at no time was I given control of the device. (when I said "I had to page down" the literal translation is "the Charter engineer had to hit the space bar a few times to scroll through the attached channels") There's no possible way for me as a 3rd party to attribute the values back to specific customers. A security auditor would disagree. -- Treason is a matter of dates |
|
  Rob In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA Premium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL
·Comcast
| reply to funchords said by funchords :said by Rob :Comcast has already made it very clear that you are not paying for unlimited Internet access. Nowhere on their website does it advertise as unlimited. With respect, Rob, other than drop the word unlimited from their advertising, Comcast has done NOTHING AT ALL to make it clear that the service has limits. One would think that "making it very clear" that the service has limits would involve actually stating the limits in the pre-sale offering. True, but now you're complaint is more of how business, in general, is handled in the U.S. |
|
  sturmvogel Obama '08
join:2008-02-07 Houston, TX
| reply to Rob Re: WOW! Comcast cut off Dave Winer ... again
said by Rob :said by funchords :said by Rob :Comcast has already made it very clear that you are not paying for unlimited Internet access. Nowhere on their website does it advertise as unlimited. With respect, Rob, other than drop the word unlimited from their advertising, Comcast has done NOTHING AT ALL to make it clear that the service has limits. One would think that "making it very clear" that the service has limits would involve actually stating the limits in the pre-sale offering. True, but now you're complaint is more of how business, in general, is handled in the U.S. Misleading business practices in general do not mean that they should not be pointed out in specific clear cases as this one. "Everybody does it" should not be a carte blanche to not follow the law, or at least this is what MPAA/RIAA say. -- Treason is a matter of dates |
|
  Rob In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA Premium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL
·Comcast
| said by sturmvogel :Misleading business practices in general do not mean that they should not be pointed out in specific clear cases as this one. "Everybody does it" should not be a carte blanche to not follow the law, or at least this is what MPAA/RIAA say. It's not misleading. Comcast has a long AUP/TOS. Do you want them to sit there and ready every condition over the phone to the customer? I don't think customers want to hear it at all.
The AUP/TOS is available, for free, on their website.
This is getting tiring. I'm no longer going to post in this thread. We've already gone over Comcast's position, your position, the FCC's position, my grandmother's position.. et all.
Ciao. |
|
  funchords Hello Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
| reply to sturmvogel Sturm & Espaeth, that exchange is growing pointless. The original point was the Espaeth has seen data that supports his idea. The on-topic concern ought to be the relevance of that data and the relevance of his point, not of whether any CPNI or corporate secrets have been exposed. |
|
  sturmvogel Obama '08
join:2008-02-07 Houston, TX | Yes, sir, understood. Apologies. -- Treason is a matter of dates |
|
  Pizz Hi
join:2000-10-27 Astoria, NY
·Verizon Online DSL
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to funchords so basically it comes down to (like usual) - if you dont agree with Comcast's stance on it's caps/throttling etc.. just leave the service?
that's the responses i get from reading about this in every single thread on this type of subject. have we grown to just accept whatever 'it is what it is' type of logic? |
|
 NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to ELRefugee said by ELRefugee :The issue isn't whether cutting back to any specific number is going to "kill anybody". It's a matter of Comcast being professional enough to simply define the service they're providing: we're paying X dollars a month for EITHER limited or unlimited internet service. NOT BOTH... It is, clearly, not "unlimited" service. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to sturmvogel said by sturmvogel :Supposedly the flagging period is for SIX months and their definition of a regular user is about 2 GB. I don't know about the length of the flagging period, but I am reasonably sure, based on comments in other Comcast threads, by other users, that 2 GB is way low. Which is why I suggested 25 GB as a "lay low" amount. I know I have been able to live with that much on my DSL connection (not that AT&T has specified any limits; but it is damned hard to hit 500 GB per month on 2.5 MB per month, or less). -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to sturmvogel said by sturmvogel :How did they make it clear in their advertisements that you are not paying for unlimited whatever ? I have never seen an advertisement for "unlimited bandwidth". I have seen, in the past, when it was contextually relevant, advertisement for "unlimited access". At the time I saw those ads, dial-up service was frequently a limited service. I had a dial-up account for $9.99 per month for five hours of access, and then access switched to metered, at the rate of $1.99 per hour (somewhere I mis-stated that as per minute; this is, I am certain a correction).
Essentially, "unlimited access" meant that you did not have to disconnect your modem from the service, not that you could download constantly, 24/7.
When dial-up providers started increasing the monthly number of hours for the price, "unlimited access" became a less useful come-on to entice people to broadband connections.
And, yes, somebody posted an advertisement from some other market, and some other time, offering "unlimited Internet"; but such an ad was never run where I live. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to sturmvogel said by sturmvogel :The 2 GB user is the probably barely computer literate user that could be fine on a $10 dial up or $20 DSL. Tut, tut. My DSL bill is $30, for 3008mbps/512kbps. I typically see 2.5Mbps/.425Mbps on speed tests.
I have downloaded, maybe, 794 GB of fansubbed anime since as early as 2005. Works out to ~22 GB per month, on average. And I am way behind on my watching. If I had downloaded only half as much, I'd still be way behind on the watching.
I am not "barely computer literate". But $57.95 a month (what I would have to pay for the lowest Comcast Internet tier here) is too much for my penny-pinching ways. Not when I can't utilize all that I download by such light use. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
  funchords Hello Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
| reply to NormanS said by NormanS :It is, clearly, not "unlimited" service. You probably didn't intend it so, but that sentence -- all alone -- illustrates so much about the present problem.
Do I unwind it like a double negative? For example
It is, clearly, not "unlimited" service. ...should be equal to... It is, clearly, "limited" service.No, because there is nothing clear about the limited nature of the service. -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...
|
|
 NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA | I have seen nothing that would lead me to believe it was ever "unlimited service". -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|