<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>wavebroad gets POOR on DNS patching in Wave Broadband</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20852382</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:48:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:48:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: wavebroad gets POOR on DNS patching</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20855324</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/722834"><b>chpalmer</b></A> : <br>They pass now...  Try it yourself.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.doxpara.com/" >www.doxpara.com/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20855324</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:25:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wavebroad gets POOR on DNS patching</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20852382</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200830/1583/Companies-and-ISPs-still-not-patched-against-Kaminsky-DNS-vulnerability" >www.thetechherald.com/article.ph&middot;&middot;&middot;rability</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20852382</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:11:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
