Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Independent VoIP Companies Fade as Cable Takes Over » Not surprising
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
730
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Vonage will probably recover »
« I'd rather not have VOIP  
page: 1 · 2 · 3
AuthorAll Replies


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

reply to funchords
Re: YOUR WRONG

said by funchords See Profile :

said by Matt See Profile :

Additionally, the MSOs VoIP product never touches the internet.
Except on Comcast, where it does -- albeit it never leaves Comcast's network but where it does ride on Comcast's network, that network is part of the Internet.
Comcast controls the QoS on "their" network. Who cares if their network is attached to the internet or not, it never leaves their backbone so no, it never traverses the internet.


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

reply to karlmarx
Re: Not surprising

said by karlmarx See Profile :

Look at the cell phone this way. I used to pay sprint 59.99 for a 1500 minute plan. BUT, add in the taxes and fees, and the real price was about $82.00 a month. I dumped that when I left, and when I came back I bought a t-mobile prepaid. 10 cents a minute. I am using about 300 minutes a month, and I pay, bingo. $30.00. Period. No taxes, no fees, no early termination fees. The way I see it, if you're not a heavy phone users (i.e. less than 20 minutes a day), then prepay is definitely the way to go. Charge up $100.00, and get a free $50.00 upgrade.
Plus the $1 fee for the days you use your phone. Because they don't offer the .10 per minute plan without it. That's the pay as you go plan, which doesn't even have a 300 minute plan.

So if you use your 20 minutes a day, your bill is now $60.

lvrdad_45

join:2001-09-18
Fort Worth, TX
·magicjack.com

Suggest you check your facts....you do not have to pay $1 a day for access with T-mobile...that is ATT. I use a pre paid T mobile phone...purchase 1000 minutes for $100, last me for a year....if I can calculate right, that is 10 cents a minute, with no access charge per day.

jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
reply to funchords
Re: YOUR WRONG

:boggle:


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype

reply to Matt
said by Matt See Profile :

Comcast controls the QoS on "their" network. Who cares if their network is attached to the internet or not, it never leaves their backbone so no, it never traverses the internet.
I didn't mince the words in that way, I said that the VOIP upstream of Comcast Digital Voice does ride on the Internet. It's not like Time Warner, which uses a dedicated chanell, Comcast uses the same uplink as HSI.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...


Medic63

join:2004-02-15
Butler, PA

reply to lvrdad_45
Re: Not surprising

T Mobile has a newer plan that does cost $1 a day on days you use the phone, in addition to the pay-as-you-go plan that you have.

»www.t-mobile.com/shop/plans/defa···OnsiteAd

There is a whole forum dedicated to it over at Howard forums.


bsr64000

@rcn.com

reply to ftth_freak
Re: YOUR WRONG

no youre wrong!

cable co's use the SAME frequency and cmts as cable modem. but the voice packets are prioritized over data packets.

said by ftth_freak See Profile :

Obviously you are technically lacking in VoIP knowledge. Cable Co's like Comcast, Time Warner, Charter, Cox and others use an entirely separate CMTS and separate return and forward signal than their cable modem system. This insures the QoS for the cable co's VoIP/phone service. For all of you P2P defenders, this mean when you are sucking up all of the upload and downoad capacity in your neighborhood with your cable modem, the VoIP/phone CMTS will not be affected. When using a third party VoIP like Vonage, Vonage piggy backs off of the same bandwidth as your cable modem and thus will be affected by the users bandwidth habits.

For instance, a user who pays for the lowest level of modem speed and uses Vonage will hear a degraded quality of voice and could also experiance dropped call if the down/up load a large file at the same time.

FYI...all things are not created equal in reality...only in your mind.

Network Guy

join:2000-08-25
New York
·PHONE POWER
·Broadvox Direct
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to ftth_freak
said by ftth_freak See Profile :

Cable Co's like Comcast, Time Warner, Charter, Cox and others use an entirely separate CMTS and separate return and forward signal than their cable modem system. This insures the QoS for the cable co's VoIP/phone service. For all of you P2P defenders, this mean when you are sucking up all of the upload and downoad capacity in your neighborhood with your cable modem, the VoIP/phone CMTS will not be affected.
MSOs do not signal the VoIP traffic separately. They use the same QAM modulation, merely different channel. That means when the local node becomes saturated with more voice traffic than allocated on that fiber strand, you will get similar conditions to routing VoIP over public Internet.

Also, MSOs don't always necessarily hand off directly to PSTN. They may use someone like Level3 who then turns around and hands it off.

This has always been the major difference between cable VoIP and third-party carrier VoIP. Personally, choppy calls via CLEC VoIP are often rare and far between that it hardly matters and justifies the $15 price mark-up.

DonLibes
Premium,ExMod 2001
join:2003-01-19

reply to Anonymous
said by Anonymous See Profile :

Cable co in my area charges $29.99/mo if you bundle all three services so it's worth $5 extra just to have these benefits.
But what about next year when the promotion ends and they jack up the rates?

baj475

join:2004-11-02
Chico, CA
·Future Nine Corpor..

reply to Network Guy
Network Guy,

Are you saying that a $15 price mark-up is justified because choppy calls via CLEC VoIP are rare and far between? If so, I guess that depends how choppy the alternatives are. The difference in voice quality between my previous ILEC landlines and my Magicjack and Future Nine VOIP lines is almost nil. Clearly not worth spending $15 more for a slight possible improvement.

Network Guy

join:2000-08-25
New York
You read that wrong.

I prefer the cheaper CLEC alternative both because in my experience the difference is negligible and because of price.

And I just personally prefer not to give the evil local MSO one more penny for anything.

baj475

join:2004-11-02
Chico, CA
Network Guy,

I wondered if I was reading it wrong.

Network Guy

join:2000-08-25
New York


Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-01
IA
reply to DonLibes
I've had it for almost 3 years now. Also this is regular pricing.


dodgetech2

join:2002-01-01
Gouldsboro, PA
·ProLog
·Vonage


1 edit
reply to Chris 313
Re: Not surprising

said by Chris 313 See Profile
I got Comcast Digital Voice now and it works like a charm, even when I don't have power. That's worth the money to me.

Thats because the Comcast modem has a built in battery backup.....only a fool would run a VOIP router without one....either built in or external.

DonLibes
Premium,ExMod 2001
join:2003-01-19

reply to Anonymous
Re: YOUR WRONG

said by Anonymous See Profile :

I've had it for almost 3 years now. Also this is regular pricing.
Please identify the cable company to which you are referring, preferably with a website that posts the rates so we can all see them.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

reply to baj475
Re: what about 911 service having phone when the power goes out.

MagicJack, sorry to say, is a toy, not phone. Phone is something that is a utility and has a level of protection over seeing it. Have you read the MagicJack terms of service? You basically don't own a thing at all.. no guarantees either.. look close, you don't even have rights to the phone number. And, if anything happens, who is out to protect you?

At least with Telco, there are regulators, with cable, there are franchises and other bodies watching out for your service,with Vonage and other indie voips, even the ones that went under, there was a presence, warnings, and you were able to get out.

MagicJack could fold tomorrow and who's going to care?

As much as I was debating (I forget his screen name, he argues MJ all the time and has his own VOIP, TINY, voip service in CA) I agree with him.. the model is un-sustainable. MJ won't be around long.

What's ok about it simple.. enjoy it while you can. DO we know the model? No.. no one does. Will you save some money for a while? ABSOLUTELY! So it's a good thing to have.. but.. a real phone service? No... it's not.
Not only do you need the ISP.. you have to have a computer running 24/7 and hope IT too doesn't crash.

So come on... you can't pass off Magic Jack as real phone service. I have Comcast, Qwest, and even two vonage lines. I love Vonage.. it works great.. has for a few years... do I put full faith and trust in it? No.. has it been good for me? Sure. Have I worried about them? yes.. do I call doom and gloom on them? no.. Vonage is too big and strong right now. Is it real phone service? Not really... it's not backed by anything, has no transport of its own, is dependent on another service to operate - BUT AT LEAST it has a stand alone piece of hardware that operates it. MagicJack has WAY too many things in its way to go wrong, and we ALL know how stable and reliable windows is, right? (And people, yes, XP has been good, and I know there are people, such as much self, that have had good luck with windows, so spare me the "but my system is stable" BS.. Windows has issues and I'd never trust my home, or family's safety to it and MJ)

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

reply to lengyelc
Re: Not surprising

My main issue, still , over any voip is that there is no accountability for them to have. When ever there are problems, and I'm sure many of us have had them (I'm a vonage sub too) they will always blame your ISP.

It's worth, to me, and many others, to have a company to nail to the wall.

Comcast was accused of failing on a 911 call. At least you can go after them with some luck. If Vonage failed, how are you going to go after them? Your ISP has no accountability for your voice service.

I don't think, in our life time, we will ever see an ISP be help liable for any 3rd party voip service.

Safety is just too important to me, and many others, among other things, to put their full faith in vonage or call vantage.

Does it work? SURE! Is it great? I love mine.. would I put my life in it? NO.. that's why I still have service with other providers.


MacLeech
The one and only
Premium
join:2001-07-14
SoCal


1 edit
reply to DonLibes
Re: YOUR WRONG

said by DonLibes See Profile :

said by Anonymous See Profile :

I've had it for almost 3 years now. Also this is regular pricing.
Please identify the cable company to which you are referring, preferably with a website that posts the rates so we can all see them.
Try here:
»www.mediacomcable.com/phone.html

baj475

join:2004-11-02
Chico, CA
·Future Nine Corpor..

reply to fiberguy
Re: Not surprising

fiberguy,

For toys my Magicjacks work pretty well as phones!

Why should I care who, if anyone, is overseeing MagicJack? Yes I have read the TOS. If I lease a car, I do not own it but that does not mean I do not have the exclusive right to use it. Why do I need rights to my Magicjack phone numbers? Is there a market for used phone numbers? Why do you think I need someone to protect me from Magicjack? If Magicjack does not perform to my satisfaction they loose me as a customer. This is all the protection I need or want, since I have already saved more than what they cost me. If MagicJack folded tomorrow I would care, but only because I would no longer be saving $50/mo.

I think you are referring to nitzan. If so, he is in Georgia. His company is Future Nine. While I disagreed with nitzan about how long Magicjack will be around, this should not be taken as an adverse personal reflection on him. In addition to my two Magicjacks, I have two Future Nine VOIP lines and can say that nitzan is very knowledgeable and provides excellent service. While a bargain, his service costs more than Magicjack's but provides things Magicjack's does not. Future Nine provided local phone numbers which are not yet available in my area from Magicjack and I can turn my computers off, since my ATA (Linsksy PAP2T) connecting me to Future Nine's servers plugs directly into my router.

We will just have to agree to disagree on whether Magicjack provides real phone service. To me it is real because I can do anything with them that I was doing with my AT&T land lines. If Vonage is not a real phone service under your definition, then I guess that the only thing that would qualify would be an ILEC land line and even those lines can go out in storms and fires.

Wanting to have a company to nail to the wall makes you sound litigious.

Not that safety is not important but you seem paranoid over potential but unlikely safety issues. I never suggested that having an alternative was not a good idea. While my phone service is dependent upon my internet connection, that will not prevent me from using my cell phone. I just do not see 911 service or the ability to yak on the phone whenever the mood strikes me as critical.

With respect to your comment about not having 911 service when the grid goes out, that is not likely to happen, because power to my lights, coffee pot, microwave, computers, modem and router is backed up by battery powered inverters. I do not see that AT&T's telephone lines hanging from poles are any safer from errant motorist than Comcast's cables. Accordingly, I do not think I have given up anything with regard to 911 service and/or safety by relying solely on VOIP.
-
Forums » Independent VoIP Companies Fade as Cable Takes OverVonage will probably recover »
« I'd rather not have VOIP  
page: 1 · 2 · 3


Thursday, 26-Nov 11:15:10 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [107] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [105] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [68] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [50] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [32] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
· [31] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Telemarketing Hell: Heather's back [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· No Newegg connection [General Questions]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]