 lengyelc
join:2005-12-11 Alpharetta, GA
·AT&T CallVantage
·AT&T U-Verse
1 edit | reply to Lenagainster Re: Not surprising
Agree 100%, and so will just about everyone reading this thread. People don't have the time to mess with home wiring, QoS routers and/or firmware flashing, and all those other hardware/software tricks that are required to get a nice stable voip connection through a third party provider.
Comcast certainly preys on customer stupidity. Have you seen their commercials? Those alone were enough to make me puke and change providers! |
|
 ftth_freak
join:2005-06-17 Ballwin, MO
| Re: YOUR WRONG
Obviously you are technically lacking in VoIP knowledge. Cable Co's like Comcast, Time Warner, Charter, Cox and others use an entirely separate CMTS and separate return and forward signal than their cable modem system. This insures the QoS for the cable co's VoIP/phone service. For all of you P2P defenders, this mean when you are sucking up all of the upload and downoad capacity in your neighborhood with your cable modem, the VoIP/phone CMTS will not be affected. When using a third party VoIP like Vonage, Vonage piggy backs off of the same bandwidth as your cable modem and thus will be affected by the users bandwidth habits.
For instance, a user who pays for the lowest level of modem speed and uses Vonage will hear a degraded quality of voice and could also experiance dropped call if the down/up load a large file at the same time.
FYI...all things are not created equal in reality...only in your mind. |
|
  fatmanskinny Premium join:2004-01-04 Wandering | That was a great post. Thanks for educating me. I sure as hell didn't know that! -- The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary. |
|
  MacLeech The one and only Premium join:2001-07-14 SoCal
2 edits | reply to ftth_freak said by ftth_freak : Cable Co's like Comcast, Time Warner, Charter, Cox and others use an entirely separate CMTS and separate return and forward signal than their cable modem system. Cable co's COULD do that, but the most don't.
Most setup separate service flows over the same upstream/downstream channels the cable modems use. Phone services are given higher priority and guaranteed bandwidth so general internet use doesn't impact phone service.
If the cable companies were using separate CMTSs or even just separate upstream/downstream channels they couldn't provision eMTAs to allow for both internet access and phone service from the same unit as current DOCSIS 1 and 2 modems can't tune to more than 1 upstream and 1 downstream channel at a time.
Companies that REQUIRE seperate phone and internet modems may be using separate channels or CMTSs but that's pretty rare.
The nice thing about cable co's VOIP implementations is that they DON'T route voice traffic over the internet like 3rd party VOIP providers HAVE to. Cable can keep the traffic on their own private network (on it's own VLAN) until they hand it off to PSTN providers if needed for an off-net call. Some cable providers also have agreements and links with others so they can directly hand off traffic to each other without 3rd party network involvement. If both ends of the call are on cable VOIP, the call traffic may not even leave the cable providers' networks. -- Don't mind me, I'm just trying to help...
|
|
  funchords Hello Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
| reply to ftth_freak Re: YOUR WRONG ... and so are you ... and who cares?
said by ftth_freak :Obviously you are technically lacking in VoIP knowledge. I think the above sentence ought to be banned from DSLReports. We're all here to learn. Otherwise we're just showing off.
said by ftth_freak :Cable Co's like Comcast, Time Warner, Charter, Cox and others use an entirely separate CMTS and separate return and forward signal than their cable modem system. Comcast has elected to use the same return as their High-Speed Internet. But then they use DOCSIS service flows to carve out space (in the already crowded upstream) for it. -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...
|
|
  Anonymous Premium join:2004-06-01 IA | reply to ftth_freak Re: YOUR WRONG
Not only it has dedicated bandwidth it's also a lot more secure.
Cable co in my area charges $29.99/mo if you bundle all three services so it's worth $5 extra just to have these benefits. |
|
  Matt Gone playing Dragon Age Origins Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| reply to ftth_freak Additionally, the MSOs VoIP product never touches the internet. It flows over their own network to the facility where they have their PSTN connectivity. They can control the quality end-to-end, whereas an Indie VoIP provider is subject to the delays of the internet.
FYI, I have an Indie VoIP phone. (Nuvio nPBX w/ a Polycom 501) |
|
 fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
1 edit | reply to lengyelc Re: Not surprising
said by lengyelc :Comcast certainly preys on customer stupidity. Have you seen their commercials? Those alone were enough to make me puke and change providers! Then do the forum a favor and do that.
Comcast 'preys'... that's stretching it. Considering that Americans have been accustomed to paying $70+ phone bills for years, $50 isn't that bad.
It's clear you are either are too young to have ever experienced real hardship and real phone service, or you(and the others - to be fair) don't find that utilities and other necessities are priorities and would rather have your money to spend on music, over priced clothing, high end TV's and, here's one... OVER PRICED CELLULAR SERVICE. ANYONE here with a cell phone should rethink about bitching at even a $50 unlimited wire-line phone service when cellular service is THE most expensive way to place a call. (Not to mention, about 95% of the people in this site have no real reason to say they "need" a cellular phone.
I think I'd certainly call cell and satellite tv companies that lock customers into inescapable contracts (High EFTs) and no recourse to pour service 'preying' on customers... simply marketing a $50 phone service is not preying. And, simply because Vonage and the likes offer a $25 phone service doesn't devalue the cable offering.
And YES, in this message, I am 100% defending cable/comcast on this point.. because you're simply wrong. |
|
  Matt Gone playing Dragon Age Origins Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| said by fiberguy :OVER PRICED CELLULAR SERVICE. ANYONE here with a cell phone should rethink about bitching at even a $50 unlimited wire-line phone service when cellular service is THE most expensive way to place a call. (Not to mention, about 95% of the people in this site have no real reason to say they "need" a cellular phone. While I agree with overpriced, I think the rest of your rant is completely unfounded. To me it's worth twice as much to be able to take my phone with me. Even if I'm 8 miles into a long run in the middle of nowhere I can make a call or people can reach me with emergencies. I have TWO phones actually, a main one, and one I run with that I use only for emergencies. |
|
 lengyelc
join:2005-12-11 Alpharetta, GA
·AT&T CallVantage
·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to fiberguy Wow...easy there fiberguy. For the record, I did puke and I did change providers 
Now, regarding your personal attacks, try to keep those off a discussion on technology. I agree with your stance on cell phone charges and I certainly am open minded enough to firmly believe that what works for one does not for another.
Personally, like many on here, I'll stick with my $19.99/mo callvantage, with UPS backup, and try my damndest to build my savings so I can afford to send my kids to college. No time for music or cheap clothing. Though with interest rates being so low and inflation....
Wait, I'm man enough to take that discussion to another board. |
|
  funchords Hello Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
| reply to Matt Re: YOUR WRONG
said by Matt :Additionally, the MSOs VoIP product never touches the internet. Except on Comcast, where it does -- albeit it never leaves Comcast's network but where it does ride on Comcast's network, that network is part of the Internet. -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...
|
|
  karlmarx
join:2006-09-18 iraq
·Fairpoint Communic..
| reply to fiberguy Re: Not surprising
Look at the cell phone this way. I used to pay sprint 59.99 for a 1500 minute plan. BUT, add in the taxes and fees, and the real price was about $82.00 a month. I dumped that when I left, and when I came back I bought a t-mobile prepaid. 10 cents a minute. I am using about 300 minutes a month, and I pay, bingo. $30.00. Period. No taxes, no fees, no early termination fees. The way I see it, if you're not a heavy phone users (i.e. less than 20 minutes a day), then prepay is definitely the way to go. Charge up $100.00, and get a free $50.00 upgrade. -- The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity! |
|
  Matt Gone playing Dragon Age Origins Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| reply to funchords Re: YOUR WRONG
said by funchords :said by Matt :Additionally, the MSOs VoIP product never touches the internet. Except on Comcast, where it does -- albeit it never leaves Comcast's network but where it does ride on Comcast's network, that network is part of the Internet. Comcast controls the QoS on "their" network. Who cares if their network is attached to the internet or not, it never leaves their backbone so no, it never traverses the internet. |
|
  Matt Gone playing Dragon Age Origins Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| reply to karlmarx Re: Not surprising
said by karlmarx :Look at the cell phone this way. I used to pay sprint 59.99 for a 1500 minute plan. BUT, add in the taxes and fees, and the real price was about $82.00 a month. I dumped that when I left, and when I came back I bought a t-mobile prepaid. 10 cents a minute. I am using about 300 minutes a month, and I pay, bingo. $30.00. Period. No taxes, no fees, no early termination fees. The way I see it, if you're not a heavy phone users (i.e. less than 20 minutes a day), then prepay is definitely the way to go. Charge up $100.00, and get a free $50.00 upgrade. Plus the $1 fee for the days you use your phone. Because they don't offer the .10 per minute plan without it. That's the pay as you go plan, which doesn't even have a 300 minute plan.
So if you use your 20 minutes a day, your bill is now $60. |
|
 lvrdad_45
join:2001-09-18 Fort Worth, TX
·magicjack.com
| Suggest you check your facts....you do not have to pay $1 a day for access with T-mobile...that is ATT. I use a pre paid T mobile phone...purchase 1000 minutes for $100, last me for a year....if I can calculate right, that is 10 cents a minute, with no access charge per day. |
|
 jester121
join:2003-08-09 Lake Zurich, IL | reply to funchords Re: YOUR WRONG
:boggle: |
|
  funchords Hello Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
| reply to Matt said by Matt :Comcast controls the QoS on "their" network. Who cares if their network is attached to the internet or not, it never leaves their backbone so no, it never traverses the internet. I didn't mince the words in that way, I said that the VOIP upstream of Comcast Digital Voice does ride on the Internet. It's not like Time Warner, which uses a dedicated chanell, Comcast uses the same uplink as HSI. -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...
|
|
  bsr64000
@rcn.com
| reply to ftth_freak no youre wrong!
cable co's use the SAME frequency and cmts as cable modem. but the voice packets are prioritized over data packets.
said by ftth_freak :Obviously you are technically lacking in VoIP knowledge. Cable Co's like Comcast, Time Warner, Charter, Cox and others use an entirely separate CMTS and separate return and forward signal than their cable modem system. This insures the QoS for the cable co's VoIP/phone service. For all of you P2P defenders, this mean when you are sucking up all of the upload and downoad capacity in your neighborhood with your cable modem, the VoIP/phone CMTS will not be affected. When using a third party VoIP like Vonage, Vonage piggy backs off of the same bandwidth as your cable modem and thus will be affected by the users bandwidth habits. For instance, a user who pays for the lowest level of modem speed and uses Vonage will hear a degraded quality of voice and could also experiance dropped call if the down/up load a large file at the same time. FYI...all things are not created equal in reality...only in your mind. |
|
  Medic63
join:2004-02-15 Butler, PA
| reply to lvrdad_45 Re: Not surprising
T Mobile has a newer plan that does cost $1 a day on days you use the phone, in addition to the pay-as-you-go plan that you have.
»www.t-mobile.com/shop/plans/defa···OnsiteAd
There is a whole forum dedicated to it over at Howard forums. |
|
 Network Guy
join:2000-08-25 New York
·PHONE POWER
·Broadvox Direct
·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to ftth_freak Re: YOUR WRONG
said by ftth_freak : Cable Co's like Comcast, Time Warner, Charter, Cox and others use an entirely separate CMTS and separate return and forward signal than their cable modem system. This insures the QoS for the cable co's VoIP/phone service. For all of you P2P defenders, this mean when you are sucking up all of the upload and downoad capacity in your neighborhood with your cable modem, the VoIP/phone CMTS will not be affected. MSOs do not signal the VoIP traffic separately. They use the same QAM modulation, merely different channel. That means when the local node becomes saturated with more voice traffic than allocated on that fiber strand, you will get similar conditions to routing VoIP over public Internet.
Also, MSOs don't always necessarily hand off directly to PSTN. They may use someone like Level3 who then turns around and hands it off.
This has always been the major difference between cable VoIP and third-party carrier VoIP. Personally, choppy calls via CLEC VoIP are often rare and far between that it hardly matters and justifies the $15 price mark-up. |
|