fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| reply to funchords
Re: Not surprising
In all honesty, regarding giving the likes of Vonage priority and all, I think Vonage would be just as good as say Comcast or Cox. I have both CDV and Vonage. My CDV runs on Comcast, obviously, and my Vonage runs on a Qwest 1.5/896 line. The Vonage in MY home has been FAR superior to that of Comcast. CDV goes down every time the internet connection goes down. I think the CDV service would work better if I ran it over a Qwest DSL connection (which it won't  ) but if I had to give an overall rating of CDV over Vonage in MY experience with the product taking MY application to play, the quality of Vonage is superior to that of Comcast CDV.
What does this tell me? The service is still only as strong as the connection running it.
To date, I've yet had a CDV only outage. It's always been CDV and HSI together.
I don't think I could support ISPs having to be required to prioritize Voip. (And I am not assuming you are or are not either) I say this only because I believe the internet is a compilation of all traffic. The moment you give VoIP any priority, then other video providers will want it, and then others, and others.. etc. I still believe that Video already has a delivery system(s) as does phone.
personally, I'd like to see the internet (last mile plants) be capable of handling at LEAST 10 times more (if not more) traffic than it does now. While I don't think that internet is ready for everything tossed at it now, I DO think that in the somewhat near future it's going to have to evolve. I also believe they know this too (the ISPs) and since so much is coming on the horizon, it's a waiting game to see what the best way to upgrade is in order to save capital. So far, no ISP has been immune to that - even Fios has already performed an upgrade to some of it's fiber networks.
I think it will be inevitable that we're going to pay more for the internet in the near future for the mere fact that we're calling for it to do much much more. As revenue lags from one profit center, another will have to pick up the slack to compensate. I think we're slowly seeing this now. |
|
funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
 ·Verizon Online DSL
 ·Skype
| reply to fiberguy
I think you're dead on with the 5-nines expectation as being one of the required qualities of telephone service.
I'm personally a bit on the fence.
If the ISPs were required to prioritize or segregate Vonage in the same way that they handle their own VOIP offering, do you think Vonage could hit that level of reliability? Or do the ISPs automatically get a competitive advantage (as it is today) since they're making the investment outlay in the network? Should VOIP providers or VOIP users be allowed to pay an extra fee to get the same level of service and allow the ISPs to recapture their investment?
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...
|
|
baj475
join:2004-11-02
Chico, CA
·Future Nine Corpor..
| reply to fiberguy
fiberguy,
Generational? Just how old or young do you think I am?
I do not think it is generational unless you are either so young as to be a whippersnapper or so old to be nearly senile and you do not sound like either. If you recall, I originally asked you for your definition of phone service because it was obviously different than mine. You can define the term phone service anyway you want. The important thing is that we understand that we are ascribing different definitions.
I do not think I called you litigious. What I said is that some of your words made you sound that way. However, one offhand remark is not enough to know if you are truly litigious, so I will accept your representation that you are not.
Monkey rigged? I am out of touch? How? I fully understand the limitations of VOIP. To me those limitations are not critical or even of much importance. To you they are. From my prospective you are excessively worried about minimal possibilities. From your prospective I probably appear naive. If you are not comfortable with what I am that is fine. That is your choice. I am not suggesting that you are out of touch only that we have different priorities and different opinions on how reliable a phone systems needs to be to satisfy our respective needs. |
|
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| reply to baj475
Our difference is most likely generational, for one, and the fact that I, like so many others, still hold telephone as a life-line service. (as does the government) If Magic Jack works for you, great. For almost the rest of Americans, including myself, it doesn't, and that's cool.
But, in my eyes, it's not phone service. Phone in this country has a reliability factor which MJ doesn't have. And to call me litigious is not accurate. I am realistic. Since phone is a life line, I, again, like so many, have an expectation for a level of service and for it to be there when you need it. Telephone has five 9's in order to be qualified by just about any PUC in the U.S.. Again, MJ doesn't have that, nor does the likes of Vonage and others.
While you and people like you are ok with having monkey rigged phone service, I'm not looking to have alternatives. Again, people want and expect phone service to be there. Paranoid? Use all those terms you want, but the bottom line, it is you who is out of touch on this subject, not me. If I or others weren't worried about having a phone service available for emergencies, why do we have a 911 system in the first place?
I'm sorry to say this, but I'm going to 'go there' on this next subject. You ARE out of line here. Some things, in life, are deemed so by the greater good of society. In this country, 911 IS critical. Just because you don't doesn't make it right for everyone else, OR, even yourself. In this case, society rules you on this. If you don't think 911 is critical, sorry to say, I'm sure you have family that will. If something major happened to you that put you in a bad spot, or made you a veg and you became a burden on your family because of faulty phone service or lack of 911 in the time of need, I'm CERTAIN your family would try to sue FOR you..
So again, sorry to say this, I don't care if it's "not for you" or not.. this is a case where I can stand back and tell you that you are wrong even for you on your own end. Some things are larger than even one's self and this is one of them.
No matter how many inverters you have/use, or how ever you've "set yourself up".. I still remain on my side that telephone is not designed to need this amount of effort. You're still not convincing me to your side. MJ still isn't "phone service" in my eyes, and others.. it's simply a techs' tool, and a company for someone to make a bunch of money off people before running. I DO still, however, agree that it's a good money savings for as long as you can use it and it's around.. but a phone service..? No. you won't convince me. |
|
baj475
join:2004-11-02
Chico, CA
·Future Nine Corpor..
| reply to fiberguy
fiberguy,
For toys my Magicjacks work pretty well as phones! 
Why should I care who, if anyone, is overseeing MagicJack? Yes I have read the TOS. If I lease a car, I do not own it but that does not mean I do not have the exclusive right to use it. Why do I need rights to my Magicjack phone numbers? Is there a market for used phone numbers? Why do you think I need someone to protect me from Magicjack? If Magicjack does not perform to my satisfaction they loose me as a customer. This is all the protection I need or want, since I have already saved more than what they cost me. If MagicJack folded tomorrow I would care, but only because I would no longer be saving $50/mo.
I think you are referring to nitzan. If so, he is in Georgia. His company is Future Nine. While I disagreed with nitzan about how long Magicjack will be around, this should not be taken as an adverse personal reflection on him. In addition to my two Magicjacks, I have two Future Nine VOIP lines and can say that nitzan is very knowledgeable and provides excellent service. While a bargain, his service costs more than Magicjack's but provides things Magicjack's does not. Future Nine provided local phone numbers which are not yet available in my area from Magicjack and I can turn my computers off, since my ATA (Linsksy PAP2T) connecting me to Future Nine's servers plugs directly into my router.
We will just have to agree to disagree on whether Magicjack provides real phone service. To me it is real because I can do anything with them that I was doing with my AT&T land lines. If Vonage is not a real phone service under your definition, then I guess that the only thing that would qualify would be an ILEC land line and even those lines can go out in storms and fires.
Wanting to have a company to nail to the wall makes you sound litigious.
Not that safety is not important but you seem paranoid over potential but unlikely safety issues. I never suggested that having an alternative was not a good idea. While my phone service is dependent upon my internet connection, that will not prevent me from using my cell phone. I just do not see 911 service or the ability to yak on the phone whenever the mood strikes me as critical.
With respect to your comment about not having 911 service when the grid goes out, that is not likely to happen, because power to my lights, coffee pot, microwave, computers, modem and router is backed up by battery powered inverters. I do not see that AT&T's telephone lines hanging from poles are any safer from errant motorist than Comcast's cables. Accordingly, I do not think I have given up anything with regard to 911 service and/or safety by relying solely on VOIP. |
|
MacLeech
The one and only
Premium
join:2001-07-14
SoCal
1 edit | reply to DonLibes
Re: YOUR WRONG
said by DonLibes  :said by Anonymous :I've had it for almost 3 years now. Also this is regular pricing. Please identify the cable company to which you are referring, preferably with a website that posts the rates so we can all see them. Try here:
»www.mediacomcable.com/phone.html |
|
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| reply to lengyelc
Re: Not surprising
My main issue, still , over any voip is that there is no accountability for them to have. When ever there are problems, and I'm sure many of us have had them (I'm a vonage sub too) they will always blame your ISP.
It's worth, to me, and many others, to have a company to nail to the wall.
Comcast was accused of failing on a 911 call. At least you can go after them with some luck. If Vonage failed, how are you going to go after them? Your ISP has no accountability for your voice service.
I don't think, in our life time, we will ever see an ISP be help liable for any 3rd party voip service.
Safety is just too important to me, and many others, among other things, to put their full faith in vonage or call vantage.
Does it work? SURE! Is it great? I love mine.. would I put my life in it? NO.. that's why I still have service with other providers. |
|
DonLibes
Premium,ExMod 2001
join:2003-01-19
| reply to Anonymous
Re: YOUR WRONG
said by Anonymous :I've had it for almost 3 years now. Also this is regular pricing. Please identify the cable company to which you are referring, preferably with a website that posts the rates so we can all see them. |
|
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-01
IA | reply to DonLibes
I've had it for almost 3 years now. Also this is regular pricing. |
|
Network Guy
join:2000-08-25
New York | reply to baj475
|
|
baj475
join:2004-11-02
Chico, CA | reply to Network Guy
Network Guy,
I wondered if I was reading it wrong.  |
|
Network Guy
join:2000-08-25
New York | reply to baj475
You read that wrong.
I prefer the cheaper CLEC alternative both because in my experience the difference is negligible and because of price.
And I just personally prefer not to give the evil local MSO one more penny for anything. |
|
baj475
join:2004-11-02
Chico, CA
·Future Nine Corpor..
| reply to Network Guy
Network Guy,
Are you saying that a $15 price mark-up is justified because choppy calls via CLEC VoIP are rare and far between? If so, I guess that depends how choppy the alternatives are. The difference in voice quality between my previous ILEC landlines and my Magicjack and Future Nine VOIP lines is almost nil. Clearly not worth spending $15 more for a slight possible improvement. |
|
DonLibes
Premium,ExMod 2001
join:2003-01-19
| reply to Anonymous
said by Anonymous :Cable co in my area charges $29.99/mo if you bundle all three services so it's worth $5 extra just to have these benefits. But what about next year when the promotion ends and they jack up the rates? |
|
Network Guy
join:2000-08-25
New York
·PHONE POWER
·Broadvox Direct
·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to ftth_freak
said by ftth_freak : Cable Co's like Comcast, Time Warner, Charter, Cox and others use an entirely separate CMTS and separate return and forward signal than their cable modem system. This insures the QoS for the cable co's VoIP/phone service. For all of you P2P defenders, this mean when you are sucking up all of the upload and downoad capacity in your neighborhood with your cable modem, the VoIP/phone CMTS will not be affected. MSOs do not signal the VoIP traffic separately. They use the same QAM modulation, merely different channel. That means when the local node becomes saturated with more voice traffic than allocated on that fiber strand, you will get similar conditions to routing VoIP over public Internet.
Also, MSOs don't always necessarily hand off directly to PSTN. They may use someone like Level3 who then turns around and hands it off.
This has always been the major difference between cable VoIP and third-party carrier VoIP. Personally, choppy calls via CLEC VoIP are often rare and far between that it hardly matters and justifies the $15 price mark-up. |
|
Medic63
join:2004-02-15
Butler, PA
| reply to lvrdad_45
Re: Not surprising
T Mobile has a newer plan that does cost $1 a day on days you use the phone, in addition to the pay-as-you-go plan that you have.
»www.t-mobile.com/shop/plans/defa···OnsiteAd
There is a whole forum dedicated to it over at Howard forums. |
|
bsr64000
@rcn.com
| reply to ftth_freak
Re: YOUR WRONG
no youre wrong!
cable co's use the SAME frequency and cmts as cable modem. but the voice packets are prioritized over data packets.
said by ftth_freak :Obviously you are technically lacking in VoIP knowledge. Cable Co's like Comcast, Time Warner, Charter, Cox and others use an entirely separate CMTS and separate return and forward signal than their cable modem system. This insures the QoS for the cable co's VoIP/phone service. For all of you P2P defenders, this mean when you are sucking up all of the upload and downoad capacity in your neighborhood with your cable modem, the VoIP/phone CMTS will not be affected. When using a third party VoIP like Vonage, Vonage piggy backs off of the same bandwidth as your cable modem and thus will be affected by the users bandwidth habits. For instance, a user who pays for the lowest level of modem speed and uses Vonage will hear a degraded quality of voice and could also experiance dropped call if the down/up load a large file at the same time. FYI...all things are not created equal in reality...only in your mind. |
|
funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
| reply to Matt
said by Matt :Comcast controls the QoS on "their" network. Who cares if their network is attached to the internet or not, it never leaves their backbone so no, it never traverses the internet. I didn't mince the words in that way, I said that the VOIP upstream of Comcast Digital Voice does ride on the Internet. It's not like Time Warner, which uses a dedicated chanell, Comcast uses the same uplink as HSI.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...
|
|
jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL | reply to funchords
:boggle: |
|
lvrdad_45
join:2001-09-18
Fort Worth, TX
·magicjack.com
| reply to Matt
Re: Not surprising
Suggest you check your facts....you do not have to pay $1 a day for access with T-mobile...that is ATT. I use a pre paid T mobile phone...purchase 1000 minutes for $100, last me for a year....if I can calculate right, that is 10 cents a minute, with no access charge per day. |
|
