<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Jail in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20855712</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:36:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:36:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Jail</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20856481</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : Don't be silly.   Jail is for citizens who defy the will of Corporations and their greed for money.<br><br>Jail is not for Corporations who defy the will (and rights) of Citizens for profit and greed.... That's called "The American Way of Free Enterprise"....  <br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20856481</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:53:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Jail</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20855712</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1267996"><b>diskdocx</b></A> : Wow, way to completely miss the mark with the analogy. And, in fact, many of your points are completely wrong.<br><br>First off, the courts have clear definitions of stalking. Private investigators are legal, and have clear codes. Observing someone is not an illegal activity.<br><br>Now, if the PI broke into the spouse's residence, and accessed personal files, then they could be charged, and the information would be thrown out.<br><br>As far as "you can't go to court and say oh he spied on me illegally after I stole his music collection", um, yes you can.<br><br>How do you think people get off on Warrant technicalities? When the police search property, they have a specific scope. If they exceed their scope, charges are routinely dropped. And if they don't have a warrant, they are almost certainly dropped, and would be thrown out in court, without question.<br><br>Paying someone to hack a computer is soliciting an illegal activity. Doesn't matter what the rationale  :uhh:<br><br>Unfortunately, like the MPAA, you seem to think that alleged 'pirates' should have no rights. We afford more rights to rapists & murderers, but download a song without paying, and the end will justify the means.<br><br>Sheep...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20855712</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:34:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Jail</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20854324</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/900037"><b>HardwareGeek</b></A> : What he MPAA did isn't illegal though.<br><br>As much as I don't agree with it, but what the MPAA did is basically calling a man or a women who hires a private I spy on their spouce a stalker. <br><br>The court will see it in the same light. Plus two wrongs may not make a right but you can't go to court and say oh he spied on me illegally after I stole his music collection.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20854324</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:31:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Jail</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20852372</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1016283"><b>dks7</b></A> : I think the MPAA and those involved should serve some nice jail terms for hiring a hacker to conduct illegal activities. Lord knows us small people would be in prison for it, why shouldn't they.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20852372</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:09:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
