Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC's McDowell: The Internet Will Stop If You Regulate Comcast » A supporting commentary to McDowells
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Two things need to be done.  
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast


1 edit

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

regardless of which "side" one is on, the fact seems to remain that the simplest way to solve bandwidth problems (if there really are bandwidth problems) is TO ADD MORE BANDWIDTH.

but that's not sexy

and it cost money

and when you buy the DPI equipment, it lets you do all sorts of other stuff!

oh, by the way, McDowell is either ignorant of the facts or he chose to misrepresent what was actually found by Robb and the AP, because his description of what happened appears to be straight from Comcast press releases (I know, what a shock).
jaminus

join:2004-10-14
Arlington, VA

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

I, for one, would gladly download terabytes a month if my ISP allowed it. Do I need all that stuff? Not really. But if the bandwidth's there, I'll certainly use it. And so would many others as well.

Yes, capacity has got to increase, and that's why companies are investing in things like laying fiber, pair-bonding POTS lines, hybrid fiber-coax, DOCSIS 3.0, VDSL2, and the like.

Ultimately, though, there will ALWAYS be finite bandwidth and infinite demand for bandwidth. If you build it, they will come. That's why it's so important to manage a scarce resource in a manner that suits those who use the resource.

Is Sandvine the best way to manage a network? Probably not. But it's not entirely clear that "peak metering" is the best way, either -- after all, only 6% of Comcast's users were P2P users, and it's possible that far more users will be affected by the new metering system Comcast will soon implement.

Politicians should not be the ones who decide how ISPs deal with congestion. Competition among providers to give consumers the best possible service will benefit all of us in the long run. The fact that sometimes, some companies will make mistakes (i.e. Sandvine) is not a valid reason for abandoning the principles of freedom and private network ownership.
SilverSurfer

join:2007-08-19

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by jaminus See Profile :

Politicians should not be the ones who decide how ISPs deal with congestion. Competition among providers to give consumers the best possible service will benefit all of us in the long run.
Agreed, but politicians, unfortunately, are the only ones who ultimately make the decisions when it comes to the very competition that you refer to.

A_nano_mouse

@transbay.net

All we need is FIBER. Copper is obsolete and wireless is "stupid" until we can really reform the FCC and open the spectrum properly.

FIBER is the way to go. if 10 gbps adapters are commodified by the time you deploy, then you'll start offering your users 10 gigabit connections. Otherwise you'll have to do with a paltry ONE GIGABIT per second - aw darn.

WE (the citizens) build it - WE (the citizens hiring locally) run it - and that will be the future to live in.

See »communityfiber.org

funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype

said by nasadude See Profile :

and when you buy the DPI equipment, it lets you do all sorts of other stuff!
I think it was Bob Briscoe who said at the IETF P2P Working Group that for every $1 dollar spent on DPI the ISP saved $10 in infrastructure increases.

I guess that's good, if the only thing you worry about is controlling your costs. It doesn't say anything for the fact that the other $9 is "access denied" to the applications, destinations, and content that the users want.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by funchords See Profile :

It doesn't say anything for the fact that the other $9 is "access denied" to the applications, destinations, and content that the users want.
Rewrite:
It doesn't say anything for the fact that the other $9 is "access denied" to the applications, destinations, and content that the users music & movie thieves want.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

.. and content that the users music & movie thieves want.
TK, you are so predictable.

copyright infringement isn't theft, so they can't be thieves. Sometimes I think you're a caricature of a real person.

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by nasadude See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

.. and content that the users music & movie thieves want.
Sometimes I think you're a caricature of a real person.
A recent photo:

TK Junk Mail at home :)

--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

Jovi

join:2000-02-24
Mount Joy, PA
·T-Mobile US

Can we ever have a debate about bandwidth that does not involve being thieves?
--
"Where's my coffee? Oh. I guess it's my turn to make it."

digitalfreak

join:2005-12-09
49533

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by Jovi See Profile :

Can we ever have a debate about bandwidth that does not involve being thieves?
Not as long as TK is still allowed to post.

fireflier
Coffee. . .Need Coffee
Premium
join:2001-05-25
Limbo
·Skype

Probably not. Since thievery seems to be one of the talking points some need to use to justify corporate decisions that would otherwise be difficult to justify to paying customers.

It's easier to claim high-bandwidth users must be doing something wrong--and thus additional bandwidth is only going to support unethical or illegal activities--than actually debating the merits of legitimate use and what alternatives there are to the ISPs to handle those higher bandwidth (LEGITIMATE) applications.
--
Tradition: Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid. --despair.com

NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

The complaints about VPN or SSH being broken by DPI shoot a whole in your argument that DPI only affects "music & movie thieves".
--
---
Eleven years of carrying The Clue Bat...

espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq

said by nasadude See Profile :

regardless of which "side" one is on, the fact seems to remain that the simplest way to solve bandwidth problems (if there really are bandwidth problems) is TO ADD MORE BANDWIDTH.
That's like saying the solution to your debt problem is to acquire more money. Although technically correct, it ignores the constraints of reality that would stop you from doing so.

Case in point: name all of the full DOCSIS 3.0 (ie, not pre-cert) cable modems that are currently being mass produced today.

funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by espaeth See Profile :

Case in point: name all of the full DOCSIS 3.0 (ie, not pre-cert) cable modems that are currently being mass produced today.
Or 802.11N wi-fi gear (not DRAFT)
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
More fun, more features, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...

espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by funchords See Profile :

said by espaeth See Profile :

Case in point: name all of the full DOCSIS 3.0 (ie, not pre-cert) cable modems that are currently being mass produced today.
Or 802.11N wi-fi gear (not DRAFT)
That's not quite the same argument. The 11N standard is baked out enough that equipment will, in all probability, be firmware upgradeable to the final standard. The worst case scenario is that you end up just like the Cisco customers who bought power over Ethernet hardware before the 802.3af standard was ratified -- you can still use the hardware, but you won't be able to purchase any new devices to attach to it. Considering 11N draft APs are going for sub-$100 and NICs are dirt cheap, the hardship is also minimal.

Right now the DOCSIS 3.0 trial hardware is spendy because it's being produced in limited production runs, and modems like the DPC2505 that Comcast is using here in MN only have multiple downstream tuners combined with a single upstream tuner. Once upstream channel bonding is fully adopted and product actually starts rolling off assembly lines, the DPC2505 will simply be a $600 piece of dumpster fodder. Not exactly the kind of hardware you want to start rolling en-mass.

funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

holy crap!

So what's the bet, that they're not really going to do upstream channel bonding RSN?

espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq


1 edit

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by funchords See Profile :

So what's the bet, that they're not really going to do upstream channel bonding RSN?
They're certainly getting closer. If you look at the certification results here there were a bunch of CPE models that received D3.0 full certification in May & June. With any luck those should start turning into assembly line production runs soon.

The big issue right now is there is only one CMTS that has full D3 certification with upstream bonding support, and that's from Casa Systems. Unfortunately Cisco and Motorola seem to dominate the US cable modem head-end market...
Forums » FCC's McDowell: The Internet Will Stop If You Regulate Comcast« Two things need to be done.  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 15:13:11 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [82] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [62] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [54] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [44] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [38] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [32] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [24] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [22] Vivendi Agrees, Comcast/NBC Deal Soon
· [19] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· buying a one way ticket [General Questions]
· Wind getting a little more aggressive [TekSavvy]
· Why Criminals (Hackers) Must Not Be Rewarded [Security]
· Fun screwing with PuG raids. [World of Warcraft]
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· [Phish] email from CDC "personal vaccination profile" [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Data Usage Meter Launched [Comcast HSI]