 ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium join:2002-03-03 Mullica Hill, NJ kudos:4 | reply to funchords
Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells said by funchords:It doesn't say anything for the fact that the other $9 is "access denied" to the applications, destinations, and content that the users want. Rewrite: It doesn't say anything for the fact that the other $9 is "access denied" to the applications, destinations, and content that the users music & movie thieves want. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
|
|
 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| said by ThrowDemsOut:.. and content that the users music & movie thieves want. TK, you are so predictable.
copyright infringement isn't theft, so they can't be thieves. Sometimes I think you're a caricature of a real person. |
|
 Jovi join:2000-02-24 Mount Joy, PA | reply to ThrowDemsOut Can we ever have a debate about bandwidth that does not involve being thieves?  -- "Where's my coffee? Oh. I guess it's my turn to make it."  |
|
 | reply to ThrowDemsOut The complaints about VPN or SSH being broken by DPI shoot a whole in your argument that DPI only affects "music & movie thieves". -- --- Eleven years of carrying The Clue Bat... |
|
 ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium join:2002-03-03 Mullica Hill, NJ kudos:4 | reply to nasadude
Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells said by nasadude:said by ThrowDemsOut:.. and content that the users music & movie thieves want. Sometimes I think you're a caricature of a real person. A recent photo:
 TK Junk Mail at home :)
-- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
 | reply to Jovi said by Jovi:Can we ever have a debate about bandwidth that does not involve being thieves? Not as long as TK is still allowed to post. |
|
 fireflierCoffee. . .Need CoffeePremium join:2001-05-25 Limbo | reply to Jovi
Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells Probably not. Since thievery seems to be one of the talking points some need to use to justify corporate decisions that would otherwise be difficult to justify to paying customers.
It's easier to claim high-bandwidth users must be doing something wrong--and thus additional bandwidth is only going to support unethical or illegal activities--than actually debating the merits of legitimate use and what alternatives there are to the ISPs to handle those higher bandwidth (LEGITIMATE) applications. -- Tradition: Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid. --despair.com |
|