dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
70

FFH5
Premium Member
join:2002-03-03
Tavistock NJ

FFH5 to funchords

Premium Member

to funchords

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by funchords:

It doesn't say anything for the fact that the other $9 is "access denied" to the applications, destinations, and content that the users want.
Rewrite:
It doesn't say anything for the fact that the other $9 is "access denied" to the applications, destinations, and content that the users music & movie thieves want.
nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD

nasadude

Member

said by FFH5:

.. and content that the users music & movie thieves want.
TK, you are so predictable.

copyright infringement isn't theft, so they can't be thieves. Sometimes I think you're a caricature of a real person.

Jovi
Premium Member
join:2000-02-24
Mount Joy, PA

1 recommendation

Jovi to FFH5

Premium Member

to FFH5
Can we ever have a debate about bandwidth that does not involve being thieves?

NetAdmin1
CCNA
join:2008-05-22

NetAdmin1 to FFH5

Member

to FFH5
The complaints about VPN or SSH being broken by DPI shoot a whole in your argument that DPI only affects "music & movie thieves".
Expand your moderator at work

FFH5
Premium Member
join:2002-03-03
Tavistock NJ

1 recommendation

FFH5 to nasadude

Premium Member

to nasadude

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

said by nasadude:
said by FFH5:

.. and content that the users music & movie thieves want.
Sometimes I think you're a caricature of a real person.
A recent photo:

TK Junk Mail at home :)

Jim Kirk
Premium Member
join:2005-12-09
49985

Jim Kirk to Jovi

Premium Member

to Jovi
said by Jovi:

Can we ever have a debate about bandwidth that does not involve being thieves?
Not as long as TK is still allowed to post.
Expand your moderator at work

fireflier
Coffee. . .Need Coffee
Premium Member
join:2001-05-25
Limbo

fireflier to Jovi

Premium Member

to Jovi

Re: A supporting commentary to McDowells

Probably not. Since thievery seems to be one of the talking points some need to use to justify corporate decisions that would otherwise be difficult to justify to paying customers.

It's easier to claim high-bandwidth users must be doing something wrong--and thus additional bandwidth is only going to support unethical or illegal activities--than actually debating the merits of legitimate use and what alternatives there are to the ISPs to handle those higher bandwidth (LEGITIMATE) applications.
Expand your moderator at work