republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Bans 3G P2P Users, But Hasn't Booted Any Yet » What will Martin do about AT&T doing what Comcast does?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
re: AT&T »
« Big difference between Comcast and AT&T  
AuthorAll Replies
-


Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: What will Martin do about AT&T doing what Comcast does?

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

said by canesfan2001 See Profile :

Did AT&T throttle any traffic on their network without letting customers know in advance?
They prohibit P2P on their wireless network.
They prohibit EVERYTHING but HTTP browsing and email on their network. They are neutral...they've banned everything equally.


Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

1 edit
reply to TKJunkMail
nm - dup post


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to JasonOD
said by JasonOD :

TK, the FCC has no authority over how ISP's manage their network, plain and simple. Comcast knows this, but whether it's worth fighting a slap on the wrist is for them to decide. AT&T clearly knows this as well, and with the likely exponential growth of their 3G wireless services (the iPhone is only the begining), they're prudently setting usage rules up front, rather than deal with the problems of P2P on their wireless network at some later date.

As to Martin, if he does take any kind of hard line with AT&T or any provider regarding managing their network, 1) The FCC will be sued & 2) They'll be consequences when Martin comes looking for work when his tenure is over. Neither of which I believe the man wants to see.
I agree that he doesn't have the authority he claims and that he would lose in court. We'll just have to see if Comcast has the desire to go to court over this or not.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


JasonOD

@comcast.net


from:
TKJunkMail See Profile

reply to TKJunkMail
TK, the FCC has no authority over how ISP's manage their network, plain and simple. Comcast knows this, but whether it's worth fighting a slap on the wrist is for them to decide. AT&T clearly knows this as well, and with the likely exponential growth of their 3G wireless services (the iPhone is only the begining), they're prudently setting usage rules up front, rather than deal with the problems of P2P on their wireless network at some later date.

As to Martin, if he does take any kind of hard line with AT&T or any provider regarding managing their network, 1) The FCC will be sued & 2) They'll be consequences when Martin comes looking for work when his tenure is over. Neither of which I believe the man wants to see.


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to TKJunkMail
quote:
Martin claims that blocking or deprioritizing a method of access(protocol?) is against the FCC principles.
But, AT&T Wireless is doing neither of those things.

-- Rob
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to djrobx
said by djrobx See Profile :

Yeah, this is an interesting issue for sure. What you're saying is that the FCC's neutrality principles prevent an ISP from prohibiting any sort of activity in their TOS, and I don't think that's right.
Martin claims that blocking or deprioritizing a method of access(protocol?) is against the FCC principles. We'll see if he enforces that across the board.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable


1 edit
reply to TKJunkMail
Yeah, this is an interesting issue for sure. What you're saying is that the FCC's neutrality principles prevent an ISP from prohibiting any sort of activity in their TOS, and I don't think that's right.

There's a difference between selectively deprioritizing certain traffic that you haven't forbidden by policy, and clearly prohibiting its use in your TOS which users agree to when they sign up.
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to canesfan2001
said by canesfan2001 See Profile :

Did AT&T throttle any traffic on their network without letting customers know in advance?
They prohibit P2P on their wireless network. According to Martin that is against the FCC's network neutrality principles. And THAT is what Comcast is going to be smacked for on Friday's vote at the FCC - not lying(there is no rule against that at the FCC - but maybe at FTC for false advertising). So let's see if Martin is consistent or is just displaying his anti-Comcast grudge.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?
Forums » AT&T Bans 3G P2P Users, But Hasn't Booted Any Yetre: AT&T »
« Big difference between Comcast and AT&T  


Tuesday, 08-Dec 18:28:00 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [191] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [71] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [51] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [49] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [37] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [18] Verizon Settles With NJ Over Misleading FiOS Marketing
Most people now reading
· Servers UP!!! [World of Warcraft]
· World of Warcraft Client Patch 3.3 (12-8-2009) [World of Warcraft]
· buffs, nerfs, and 3.3 [World of Warcraft]
· SERVERS DoWN!!! [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin(s) for December 8, 2009 [Security]
· World of Warcraft Client Patch 3.3.0 (12-08-2009) [World of Warcraft]
· Triumph Emblems [World of Warcraft]
· Comcast Customers: Would You Prefer Metered Billing? [Comcast HSI]
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]