said by kamm:said by wifi4milez:said by hottboiinnc:you and a few others on here need to take a breather. They are not using tax money. They're asking COMPANIES to give the money. NOT TAX PAYERS!
I think the real point is that the money could be put to better use, regardless of where it comes from. $8 million can do a lot of good, and providing fiber access to low income areas (that can
already get broadband) is a waste.
So in other words as soon as your point (whatever it was) turned out to be based on a complete BS (due to either not reading or lack of understanding the article) you keep beating the same propaganda drums?
Interesting.
I wonder why blokes like you are alwaysafraid when something wouldn't make money for private companies but rather could help some folks, all financed from private money...
What?? That doesnt even make sense. My point (from the very start) was that it is a complete waste of $8m to provide subsidized fiber to areas already served by broadband. Faster broadband is NOT what those people need, and anyone who argues that they do is a twit. What exactly is