maartena
Stacked.
Premium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to Chiyo
Re: Cool
said by Chiyo  :Too bad its only VOD The VOD content they have control over, the TV content they don't..... We'll have to wait till TV stations actually transmit in 1080p before we see that. |
|
Geminimind
Premium
join:2003-12-20
Sacramento, CA | They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable |
|
sat
join:2001-01-25
WA
| said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable WRONG.
I have the DishNetwork HD-only package for $29.99/mo + Cinemax HD (5 channels) for $0.01/mo, and DVR for $5/mo + locals in HD for $5/mo - total comes to about $45/mo with taxes. And this 'deal' sticks for the next 2 years.
No way Comcast (the cable company where I live) can beat that. The nearest package they have will cost me close to a $100/mo. And to include that they dont even have a HD-only package - I dont watch SD at all anymore.
Cable is WAY MORE EXPENSIVE.
--
- Running Vista RTM 
- Just bought a copy of Photoshop CS2!!! |
|
Geminimind
Premium
join:2003-12-20
Sacramento, CA
 ·AT&T Yahoo
| Hmm for me to get tv from dish network it would cost me over 100 bucks a month just like comcast. I have 4 tv's and two of them are hooked up to dvrs Dont really care about movie channels because they suck too. But for me to hook up 4 tv's not all hd just 2 it would cost me over 100 bucks I went to the website and checked. |
|
supergirl
join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL
 ·Cox VOIP
·Skype
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com
| reply to sat
said by sat :said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable WRONG. I have the DishNetwork HD-only package for $29.99/mo + Cinemax HD (5 channels) for $0.01/mo, and DVR for $5/mo + locals in HD for $5/mo - total comes to about $45/mo with taxes. And this 'deal' sticks for the next 2 years. No way Comcast (the cable company where I live) can beat that. The nearest package they have will cost me close to a $100/mo. And to include that they dont even have a HD-only package - I dont watch SD at all anymore. Cable is WAY MORE EXPENSIVE. Cox HD channels are free. Not sure about Comcrap, er, Comcast!
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl |
|
CylonRed
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-06
Bloom County | reply to Geminimind
Don't make generic comments based off your one example of yourself - TW cable in my area has ALWAYS been about $20 more than sat and in most places cable is more expensive and generally has more price increases that sat. |
|
Joe12345678
join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL
| reply to sat
said by sat :said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable WRONG. I have the DishNetwork HD-only package for $29.99/mo + Cinemax HD (5 channels) for $0.01/mo, and DVR for $5/mo + locals in HD for $5/mo - total comes to about $45/mo with taxes. And this 'deal' sticks for the next 2 years. No way Comcast (the cable company where I live) can beat that. The nearest package they have will cost me close to a $100/mo. And to include that they dont even have a HD-only package - I dont watch SD at all anymore. Cable is WAY MORE EXPENSIVE. dish makes you pay more a month for each box after the first one. Then direct TV and some cable systems. |
|
Geminimind
Premium
join:2003-12-20
Sacramento, CA | everyone has a different setup but it would cost me about the same. |
|
