Geminimind
Premium
join:2003-12-20
Sacramento, CA | reply to maartena
Re: Cool
They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable |
|
sat
join:2001-01-25
WA
| said by Geminimind  :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable WRONG.
I have the DishNetwork HD-only package for $29.99/mo + Cinemax HD (5 channels) for $0.01/mo, and DVR for $5/mo + locals in HD for $5/mo - total comes to about $45/mo with taxes. And this 'deal' sticks for the next 2 years.
No way Comcast (the cable company where I live) can beat that. The nearest package they have will cost me close to a $100/mo. And to include that they dont even have a HD-only package - I dont watch SD at all anymore.
Cable is WAY MORE EXPENSIVE.
--
- Running Vista RTM 
- Just bought a copy of Photoshop CS2!!! |
|
Geminimind
Premium
join:2003-12-20
Sacramento, CA
 ·AT&T Yahoo
| Hmm for me to get tv from dish network it would cost me over 100 bucks a month just like comcast. I have 4 tv's and two of them are hooked up to dvrs Dont really care about movie channels because they suck too. But for me to hook up 4 tv's not all hd just 2 it would cost me over 100 bucks I went to the website and checked. |
|
supergirl
join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL
 ·Cox VOIP
·Skype
 ·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com
| reply to sat
said by sat :said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable WRONG. I have the DishNetwork HD-only package for $29.99/mo + Cinemax HD (5 channels) for $0.01/mo, and DVR for $5/mo + locals in HD for $5/mo - total comes to about $45/mo with taxes. And this 'deal' sticks for the next 2 years. No way Comcast (the cable company where I live) can beat that. The nearest package they have will cost me close to a $100/mo. And to include that they dont even have a HD-only package - I dont watch SD at all anymore. Cable is WAY MORE EXPENSIVE. Cox HD channels are free. Not sure about Comcrap, er, Comcast!
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl |
|
CylonRed
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-06
Bloom County | reply to Geminimind
Don't make generic comments based off your one example of yourself - TW cable in my area has ALWAYS been about $20 more than sat and in most places cable is more expensive and generally has more price increases that sat. |
|
Joe12345678
join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL
| reply to sat
said by sat :said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable said by Geminimind :They both suck anyway who cares, and they are not cheaper than cable WRONG. I have the DishNetwork HD-only package for $29.99/mo + Cinemax HD (5 channels) for $0.01/mo, and DVR for $5/mo + locals in HD for $5/mo - total comes to about $45/mo with taxes. And this 'deal' sticks for the next 2 years. No way Comcast (the cable company where I live) can beat that. The nearest package they have will cost me close to a $100/mo. And to include that they dont even have a HD-only package - I dont watch SD at all anymore. Cable is WAY MORE EXPENSIVE. dish makes you pay more a month for each box after the first one. Then direct TV and some cable systems. |
|
Geminimind
Premium
join:2003-12-20
Sacramento, CA | everyone has a different setup but it would cost me about the same. |
|
