<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: WiMax Point To Point in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20898069</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:51:13 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:51:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: WiMax Point To Point</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20898069</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  halfband <A HREF="/useremail/u/639017"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Wasn't WiMax (not to be confused with Mobile WiMax) originally intended as a point to point or last mile solution.  Looks like a good fit for very rural areas.<br> </div>All Wimax services are based on the 802.16 standard, and can be used for any application. Mobile Wimax (802.16e) simply uses different radios, but its essentially the same as fixed Wimax. In the case described in this article, ATT is using the service as a last mile replacement coupled with IP access. It would be impossible (very expensive) to wire these rural areas for DSL, so Wimax works well in this situation. Given that its meant as a DSL replacement, a fixed Wimax application is more than adequate. <br><small>--<br><b>If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.</b><br><b>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20898069</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:01:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WiMax Point To Point</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20897225</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/639017"><b>halfband</b></A> : Wasn't WiMax (not to be confused with Mobile WiMax) originally intended as a point to point or last mile solution.  Looks like a good fit for very rural areas.<br><small>--<br>Registered Bandwidth Offender #40812</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20897225</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:06:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
