<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Does this mean... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20908993</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:20:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:20:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Does this mean...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20908993</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/350457"><b>IanR</b></A> : Does this mean that CV has created a group of people who will constantly search for and then block sites? Or does the AG's office give updated sites which are to be banned? I totally agree that child pornography is reprehensible, just I don't know how CV can meet their agreement with the AG? If CV misses sites will they then be liable for prosecution by the AG?<br>These things tend to be easy for Politicians and Lawyers (AGs) to pontificate, but the actual execution sounds most difficult.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20908993</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:13:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
