<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Verizon DNS still ranks POOR&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914541</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:55:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:55:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20920343</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anonymous_ posted : the page Stalls]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20920343</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:58:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20919262</link>
<description><![CDATA[GemSnake posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1027919" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1027919');">Anonymous_</a>:</small><br><br>yea but google takes 20second LAG to load with TWC dns server with level3 1 seocnd<br> </div>You do realize that 20 seconds is 20,000ms, right? Your query will time out way before that.<br><small>--<br>"In a fight between you and the world, bet on the world." - Franz Kafka</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20919262</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:25:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20918493</link>
<description><![CDATA[digitalfreak posted : I'm sure the "scum hackers of the world" are trembling in fear of your quick wit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20918493</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:10:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20916714</link>
<description><![CDATA[scelli posted : That's your opinion, but I meant exactly what I said. <br><br>Period.<br><small>--<br>The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20916714</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:10:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20916649</link>
<description><![CDATA[LeftOfSanity posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/102396" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=102396');">scelli</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/229804" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=229804');">B</a>:</small><br><br>Okay, pick four. ;)<br><br>-- B<br> </div>Here's one more:<br><br>(e)-need to be unemployed.<br> </div>Should have stopped at (d)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20916649</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:57:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20916516</link>
<description><![CDATA[backfeed posted : Not trying to be critical, and I have used Level 3's NS servers a few times in a pinch..(mainly because I can remember the address), But I wonder what L3 thinks of all of the people that use them?  I suppose if it was a big issue they would close them up, but since OPENDNS came into being, I have had good luck with them and the price is right  :).<br>With some of the filter options we can get, I find it a great service....<br>thoughts anyone??<br><small>--<br>ERROR:  Out of Memory... Should I forget Something (Y,y)?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20916516</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:36:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915917</link>
<description><![CDATA[scelli posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/229804" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=229804');">B</a>:</small><br><br>Okay, pick four. ;)<br><br>-- B<br> </div>Here's one more:<br><br>(e)-need to be unemployed.<br><small>--<br>The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915917</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:08:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915827</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anonymous_ posted : yea but google takes 20second LAG to load with TWC dns server with level3 1 seocnd]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915827</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:51:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915339</link>
<description><![CDATA[B posted : Okay, pick four. ;)<br><br>-- B]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915339</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:24:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915312</link>
<description><![CDATA[jgantert posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/229804" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=229804');">B</a>:</small><br><br>The unpatched servers are run by people who are either (a) lazy, (b) irresponsible, or (c) cheap.  Pick three.</div>(d)Incompetent]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915312</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:18:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915098</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/692752" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=692752');">Shamayim</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1017871" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1017871');">jgantert</a>:</small><br><br>Glad I switched to OpenDNS a while back!  :)<br> </div>Can someone explain why OpenDNS remains immune?<br> </div>OpenDNS's founder and CEO says here that OpenDNS's servers were never vulnerable and he posted on his blog that he would explain later why that was the case. But he never did.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://blog.opendns.com/2008/07/08/opendns-keeping-you-safe/" >blog.opendns.com/2008/07/08/open&middot;&middot;&middot;ou-safe/</A><br><div class="bquote">I&#8217;m very proud to announce that we are one of the only DNS vendor / service providers that was not vulnerable when this issue was first discovered by Dan. During Dan&#8217;s testing he confirmed (and we later confirmed) that our DNS implementation is not susceptible to the attack that was discovered.<br><br><b>We&#8217;re going to write more about this issue in the next 24 hours to address the vulnerability in detail and explain why we aren&#8217;t affected</b> but I wanted to get the word out now so that you know you are safe using OpenDNS.</div>Maybe he thought better of putting out on the internet why his DNS servers are immune for fear of giving hackers ideas on how to attack his servers. If I were him I wouldn't be giving out any info that might make life easier for the scum hackers of the world.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20915098</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:43:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914942</link>
<description><![CDATA[GemSnake posted : 7ms will save the world. True story.<br><br>Pee. Ess. Give me an effin break!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914942</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:20:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914898</link>
<description><![CDATA[battleop posted : Hah a whole 7ms.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914898</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:14:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914842</link>
<description><![CDATA[B posted : "Remaining" immune isn't a problem.  Once a server is properly reconfigured, you're done, pretty much.<br><br>The unpatched servers are run by people who are either (a) lazy, (b) irresponsible, or (c) cheap.  Pick three.<br><br>-- B<br><small>--<br>In a realm outside causality and function</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914842</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:04:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914694</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anonymous_ posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1017871" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1017871');">jgantert</a>:</small><br><br>Yeah, those DNS servers look good now that they are patched.  :) <br> </div> well on Avg level 3 servers are 7 ms  faster then TWC's shit servers]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914694</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:37:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914625</link>
<description><![CDATA[jgantert posted : Yeah, those DNS servers look good now that they are patched.  :) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914625</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:25:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914576</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anonymous_ posted : i use Level 3 they ARE 20% faster in ms ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914576</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:19:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914548</link>
<description><![CDATA[Shamayim posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1017871" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1017871');">jgantert</a>:</small><br><br>Glad I switched to OpenDNS a while back!  :)<br> </div>Can someone explain why OpenDNS remains immune?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.whoisjesus.org">Who is Jesus? and Why it matters (to YOU).</a><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914548</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:15:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Verizon DNS still ranks POOR</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914541</link>
<description><![CDATA[jgantert posted : I'm suprised, just ran the tests again, and my Verizon FiOS DNS servers (71.242.0.12 and 71.252.0.12) still come back as POOR.  Very suprising.  I can't belive they haven't patched them yet!<br><br>Glad I switched to OpenDNS a while back!  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Verizon-DNS-still-ranks-POOR-20914541</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:13:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

