Verizon DNS still ranks POOR in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20914541 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:25:24 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:25:24 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20920343 Anonymous_ : the page Stalls]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20920343 Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:58:43 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20919262 GemSnake :
said by Anonymous_ See Profile :

yea but google takes 20second LAG to load with TWC dns server with level3 1 seocnd
You do realize that 20 seconds is 20,000ms, right? Your query will time out way before that.
--
"In a fight between you and the world, bet on the world." - Franz Kafka]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20919262 Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:25:49 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20918493 digitalfreak : I'm sure the "scum hackers of the world" are trembling in fear of your quick wit.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20918493 Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:10:10 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20916714 scelli : That's your opinion, but I meant exactly what I said.

Period.
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20916714 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:10:43 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20916649 LeftOfSanity :
said by scelli See Profile :

said by B See Profile :

Okay, pick four. ;)

-- B
Here's one more:

(e)-need to be unemployed.
Should have stopped at (d)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20916649 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:57:12 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20916516 backfeed : Not trying to be critical, and I have used Level 3's NS servers a few times in a pinch..(mainly because I can remember the address), But I wonder what L3 thinks of all of the people that use them? I suppose if it was a big issue they would close them up, but since OPENDNS came into being, I have had good luck with them and the price is right :).
With some of the filter options we can get, I find it a great service....
thoughts anyone??
--
ERROR: Out of Memory... Should I forget Something (Y,y)?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20916516 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:36:24 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915917 scelli :
said by B See Profile :

Okay, pick four. ;)

-- B
Here's one more:

(e)-need to be unemployed.
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915917 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:08:27 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915827 Anonymous_ : yea but google takes 20second LAG to load with TWC dns server with level3 1 seocnd]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915827 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:51:31 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915339 B : Okay, pick four. ;)

-- B]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915339 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:24:25 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915312 jgantert :
said by B See Profile :

The unpatched servers are run by people who are either (a) lazy, (b) irresponsible, or (c) cheap. Pick three.
(d)Incompetent]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915312 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:18:35 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915098 OverModded :
said by Shamayim See Profile :

said by jgantert See Profile :

Glad I switched to OpenDNS a while back! :)
Can someone explain why OpenDNS remains immune?
OpenDNS's founder and CEO says here that OpenDNS's servers were never vulnerable and he posted on his blog that he would explain later why that was the case. But he never did.
»blog.opendns.com/2008/07/08/open···ou-safe/
I’m very proud to announce that we are one of the only DNS vendor / service providers that was not vulnerable when this issue was first discovered by Dan. During Dan’s testing he confirmed (and we later confirmed) that our DNS implementation is not susceptible to the attack that was discovered.

We’re going to write more about this issue in the next 24 hours to address the vulnerability in detail and explain why we aren’t affected but I wanted to get the word out now so that you know you are safe using OpenDNS.
Maybe he thought better of putting out on the internet why his DNS servers are immune for fear of giving hackers ideas on how to attack his servers. If I were him I wouldn't be giving out any info that might make life easier for the scum hackers of the world.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20915098 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:43:55 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914942 GemSnake : 7ms will save the world. True story.

Pee. Ess. Give me an effin break!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914942 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:20:10 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914898 battleop : Hah a whole 7ms.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914898 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:14:58 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914842 B : "Remaining" immune isn't a problem. Once a server is properly reconfigured, you're done, pretty much.

The unpatched servers are run by people who are either (a) lazy, (b) irresponsible, or (c) cheap. Pick three.

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914842 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:04:14 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914694 Anonymous_ :
said by jgantert See Profile :

Yeah, those DNS servers look good now that they are patched. :)
well on Avg level 3 servers are 7 ms faster then TWC's shit servers]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914694 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:37:18 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914625 jgantert : Yeah, those DNS servers look good now that they are patched. :) ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914625 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:25:53 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914576 Anonymous_ : i use Level 3 they ARE 20% faster in ms ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914576 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:19:29 EDT Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914548 Shamayim :
said by jgantert See Profile :

Glad I switched to OpenDNS a while back! :)
Can someone explain why OpenDNS remains immune?
--
Who is Jesus? and Why it matters (to YOU).
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914548 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:15:28 EDT Verizon DNS still ranks POOR http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914541 jgantert : I'm suprised, just ran the tests again, and my Verizon FiOS DNS servers (71.242.0.12 and 71.252.0.12) still come back as POOR. Very suprising. I can't belive they haven't patched them yet!

Glad I switched to OpenDNS a while back! :)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20914541 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:13:09 EDT