Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs: | reply to GemSnake
Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR
the page Stalls |
|
GemSnake
Premium
join:2000-10-19
3rd layer
clubs:
| reply to Anonymous_
said by Anonymous_  :yea but google takes 20second LAG to load with TWC dns server with level3 1 seocnd You do realize that 20 seconds is 20,000ms, right? Your query will time out way before that.
--
"In a fight between you and the world, bet on the world." - Franz Kafka |
|
backfeed
is giving feedback
join:2002-12-16
Peru, IN
 ·Comcast Digital Vo..
 ·Comcast Formerly ..
|  reply to Anonymous_
Not trying to be critical, and I have used Level 3's NS servers a few times in a pinch..(mainly because I can remember the address), But I wonder what L3 thinks of all of the people that use them? I suppose if it was a big issue they would close them up, but since OPENDNS came into being, I have had good luck with them and the price is right  .
With some of the filter options we can get, I find it a great service....
thoughts anyone??
--
ERROR: Out of Memory... Should I forget Something (Y,y)? |
|
Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs: | reply to GemSnake
yea but google takes 20second LAG to load with TWC dns server with level3 1 seocnd |
|
GemSnake
Premium
join:2000-10-19
3rd layer
clubs: | reply to Anonymous_
7ms will save the world. True story.
Pee. Ess. Give me an effin break! |
|
battleop
join:2005-09-28
00000 | reply to Anonymous_
Hah a whole 7ms. |
|
Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Time Warner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP
| reply to jgantert
said by jgantert :Yeah, those DNS servers look good now that they are patched. well on Avg level 3 servers are 7 ms faster then TWC's shit servers |
|
jgantert
join:2004-06-02
Columbia, MD | reply to Anonymous_
Yeah, those DNS servers look good now that they are patched. |
|
Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs: | reply to jgantert
i use Level 3 they ARE 20% faster in ms |
|
