B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28
| Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR "Remaining" immune isn't a problem. Once a server is properly reconfigured, you're done, pretty much.
The unpatched servers are run by people who are either (a) lazy, (b) irresponsible, or (c) cheap. Pick three.
-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function | |
|
 jgantert
join:2004-06-02
Columbia, MD
| Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR said by B  :The unpatched servers are run by people who are either (a) lazy, (b) irresponsible, or (c) cheap. Pick three. (d)Incompetent | |
|
 | B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28 | Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR Okay, pick four. 
-- B | |
|
| | 
scelli
Native New Yorker
Premium
join:1999-08-07
USA
| Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR said by B :Okay, pick four. -- B Here's one more:
(e)-need to be unemployed.
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters! | |
|
| | | 
LeftOfSanity
join:2005-11-06
Felton, DE
| Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR said by scelli :said by B :Okay, pick four. -- B Here's one more: (e)-need to be unemployed. Should have stopped at (d) | |
|
| | | |
scelli
Native New Yorker
Premium
join:1999-08-07
USA | Re: Verizon DNS still ranks POOR That's your opinion, but I meant exactly what I said.
Period.
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters! | |
|
|
|
|
