Engineered Statistics for Sensationalism -

Author	All Replies
NOYB St. John 3.16 Premium join:2005-12-15 Forest Grove, OR kudos:1	Engineered Statistics for Sensationalism The article focuses on the wrong statistics. Percentage of people that are unaware of the change is irrelevant. The important statistic is both percentage and absolute number of people who are unaware of the change that are using over the air reception and therefore will actually be impacted by the lose of signal. -- Be a Good Netizen - Read, Know & Complain About Overly Restrictive Tyrannical ISP ToS & AUP »comcast.net/terms/ »verizon.net/policies/ Say Thanks with a Tool Points Donation
	to forum · permalink · 2008-08-08 16:37:25 ·
Kiwi Premium join:2003-05-26 USA/MidWest kudos:1 Reviews: ·Comcast	The article is wrong in far more than one way, guess we have to believe because it was posted on a blog, it's true. How absolutely ridiculous, uneducated seniors tag 1:3, for one thing the less educated are far more likely to watch TV and therefore see the multiple ads and for another it's such a crass biased statement to suggest seniors are stupid, or that education could or would even impact those who watch TV at a senior level. Oh, It's the net, somebody still needs to figure out HOW to do a study; nothing there that indicated any of the principal considerations of a 'Study'; was even a thought. People believe this horse shit, really?
	to forum · permalink · 2008-08-10 23:13:36 ·

Seniors Still Aren’t Aware of Digital TV Transition > Engineered Statistics for Sensationalism