<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling in TekSavvy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20938702</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:22:14 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:22:14 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20959831</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1534090"><b>NCRGuy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by bhahahaha :</small><br><br>The copyright won't pass. As soon as an election is called all the pending bills will die. They will call the election long before Oct 31st.<br><br>BUT that is also a bad thing.  Once an election is called all the depts are told no major announcements which may include the CRTC.<br> </div>It won't include the CRTC.  As an administrative tribunal they decide on their own when to hand down rulings.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20959831</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:55:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20958682</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The copyright won't pass. As soon as an election is called all the pending bills will die. They will call the election long before Oct 31st.<br><br>BUT that is also a bad thing.  Once an election is called all the depts are told no major announcements which may include the CRTC.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20958682</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:07:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20958415</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1541022"><b>chronoss2008</b></A> : BTW folks like i have said both the net neutrality and copyright seem to be getting linked, and that date of the CRTC decision is just at the same time the copyright bill WILL pass. YES it will. And then chaos will truly reign.<br>It won't matter about net neutrality when so much of what one can use HIGH SPEED for will be as little as a 500$ fine to as much as 20000 fine.<br><br>take pre 1958 dvd rips. All don't have copyright so no problem right?<br>Not with the new law, the anti circumvention makes that a 20,000 $ fine.<br>Whats the issue grab the full dvdr right?<br>Well back to bell/rogers throttling, do i dl a 4.3 gb file throttled or a 700 to 1.4 gb xvid dvdrip?<br>HRM big decision there.....<br><br>So get used to it all cause it aint going to go well.<br>And in a year when 3/4 of the high speed users just stop using high speed.....<br>they will cry piracy is the problem and bring worse laws.<br>Even though it isn't the real problem.<br><br>GREED.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20958415</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:41:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20958350</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : >I think I know why the CRTC has delayed their ruling. They <br>>have been too busy looking at the new porn channel.<br>>http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/story.html?id=36aa16ff-aee4-4cd1-9dd6-83a720dd73c8<br><br>What do they mean when they talk about 50% canadian content ?<br><br>The boys are canadian and the girls are foreign ? The actors have a canadian father and a foreign mother ?<br><br>Will the condoms used in the movies be made in canada, complete with a red canadian flag and a logo of a beaver on them ?<br><br>More importantly, will the movies be set in Canada, or just shot in Canada but with US flags and US postal boxes on streets with US license plates on cars to make it appear to be in the USA ?<br><br>Never thought of Edmonton as a porn production place. I wonder if they will be able to shoot some movies at West Edmonton Mall ? :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20958350</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:21:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20956350</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/620986"><b>DR_JAY</b></A> : I think I know why the CRTC has delayed their ruling.  They have been too busy looking at the new porn channel. :D<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/story.html?id=36aa16ff-aee4-4cd1-9dd6-83a720dd73c8" >www.canada.com/windsorstar/story&middot;&middot;&middot;20dd73c8</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20956350</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:55:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20946245</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1511161"><b>Stewy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Turbinator <A HREF="/useremail/u/1494717"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I don't understand why they didn't choose December 31, it only makes sense.<br> </div>Imagine if they would have chosen April 1st that would really have been a riot.<br><br>After viewing the big picture my money is on Bell winning this thing hands down, they will also win the bandwidth cap no problem.<br><br>Power does what it wants.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20946245</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:42:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20944790</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1546898"><b>Kyolux</b></A> : rumors for next season elections have been going on for almost or more then a year already.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20944790</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:17:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20944554</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1559385"><b>k6richar</b></A> : october 31st<br>news stations will be covering halloween<br>basicly the general public will never hear about it<br>i keep hearing rumours about a fall election hopefully we could make net neutrality an election issue]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20944554</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:38:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943811</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1494717"><b>Turbinator</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  HiVolt <A HREF="/useremail/u/273051"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>My god, October 31st???!!! That's ridiculous.<br> </div>I don't understand why they didn't choose December 31, it only makes sense.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943811</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:37:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943756</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1311511"><b>drjp81</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SALAMANCA <A HREF="/useremail/u/1557246"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><i><b>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/08/12/tech-bell.html?ref=rss" >www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008&middot;&middot;&middot;?ref=rss</A></i></b><br> </div>I don't supposte this was really directed at me? Was it?<br><small>--<br>Cheers!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943756</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:27:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943720</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1542499"><b>jerrycan</b></A> : The Internet sucks.  Back to Fidonet for me.  RUFF!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943720</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:18:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943674</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1557246"><b>SALAMANCA</b></A> : <i><b>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/08/12/tech-bell.html?ref=rss" >www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008&middot;&middot;&middot;?ref=rss</A></i></b>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943674</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:07:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943445</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1311511"><b>drjp81</b></A> : Love it!<br><small>--<br>Cheers!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20943445</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:23:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20942980</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/510249"><b>Guspaz</b></A> : JF: The ruling is likely delayed because various things delayed the process with involved parties. If they were originally intending to rule at the end of September, they may have simply decided to delay a month due to the delays in the overall procedure.<br><br>The CRTC did not decide that CAIP members were not harmed by Bell's practices. You're basically completely wrong on that count. They merely decided that they had not suffered IRREPARABLE harm. That is, harm that cannot be compensated for monetarily. And since you can attach a dollar value to everything from lost business to increased customer service costs to inability to effectively utilize/plan AHSSPI links, that makes sense; the CRTC's requirements are far too strict.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20942980</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:49:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20942833</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1457936"><b>beamer69</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>The modern holiday of Halloween has its origins in the ancient Celtic festival known as Samhain (Irish pronunciation: [&#712;s&#736;aun&#690;]; from the Old Irish samain).[2] The festival of Samhain is a celebration of the end of the harvest season in Gaelic culture, and is sometimes [3] regarded as the "Celtic New Year".[4] Traditionally, the festival was a time used by the ancient pagans to take stock of supplies and slaughter livestock for winter stores. The ancient Gaels believed that on October 31, the boundary between the alive and the deceased dissolved, and the dead become dangerous for the living by causing problems such as sickness or damaged crops. The festivals would frequently involve bonfires, where the bones of slaughtered livestock were thrown. Costumes and masks were also worn at the festivals in an attempt to mimic the evil spirits or placate them.<hr></blockquote><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween</A><br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>The modern holiday of Belloween has its origins in the ancient CRTC rulings. Traditionally, the festival was a time used by ancient Bell to take stock of supplies and slaughter wholesalers for winter stores. The ancient Bell believed that on October 31, the boundary between the alive and the deceased dissolved, and Bell became dangerous for people by causing problems such as throttling or damaging the internet. The festivals would frequently involve DPI boxes, where the TCP packets of slaughtered torrents were thrown. Fudged numbers and false statistics were also thrown at the CRTC in an attempt to mimic the truth and placate the public.<hr></blockquote><br><br>I guess this year it will be Belloween on Oct 31 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20942833</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:40:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20942496</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1509988"><b>j3richo</b></A> : damn it, that's an entire month more than what was expected!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20942496</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:07:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20941132</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by oh LOOK :</small><br><br>Per the new posting on the CRTC website(&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/8622/c51_200805153.htm" >www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/&middot;&middot;&middot;5153.htm</A>) they expect to have a ruling on Oct. 31st.</div>Halloween.  How appropriate.  Let's hope it's not a truly horrifying result. :D<br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20941132</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:53:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20941017</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1541022"><b>chronoss2008</b></A> : they want to ensure the new copyright bill gets passed by the liberal-conservative party of canada. <br><br>This then ensures they can get away with tons more stuff.<br><br>Someone buy me a printer and the ink, ill make sure peterborough never fergets......]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20941017</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:22:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20940805</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : > Delay ?<br><br>CRTC originally promised a ruling by mid-september.<br><br>Since the CRTC wasn't going to start working on this until the end of august after vacation, the delays in the filings are not the real reason for this delay in CRTC rendering a decision.<br><br>The fact that the CRTC decided that CAIP members were not harmed by Bell's DPI equipment (the may 15th injunction ruling) is probably a good indication of where they are heading. It is just a question of properly managing public perception so that there are no public backlashes.<br><br>HINT to CAIP: public opinion is the only thing that can force the CRTC to side with us, and remaining silent between now and the CRTC decision will ensure the CRTC can side with bell without any public opinion backlash. They don't car about a few hundred geeks. Media will have a 15 second report on it and will move on on oct 31. <br><br>(especially since the liberals aren't interested, the Reform party knows this isn't an important issue and donations from Bell is more important than votes from a few hundred geeks).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20940805</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:41:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20940760</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1559385"><b>k6richar</b></A> : If the CRTC sides with bell does teksavvy have some backup plans to fight bell? Perhaps an anti competative lawsuit or something?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20940760</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:31:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20940723</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1368976"><b>recneps</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Arbalister <A HREF="/useremail/u/1506059"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by anon149  :</small><br><br>The fact that Bell got the CRTC to delay this measn that they are waiting for the public to forget about this issue so that the CRTC won't have the public's opinion in mind when it rules in favour of Bell.<br> </div>Delay?<br><br>You seem to have an overblown idea of how long it takes the CRTC to move on anything.  Oct 31 is hardly delayed, in fact I'd put them well ahead fo schedule if they come up with a decision by then.  Why, that's only 7 months from the date of filing.  They've barely had time to talk about it.<br> </div>Yeah, this is a government organization we're talking about here... 3-4 months is like next-day for an ordinary organization.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20940723</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:23:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20940682</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1506059"><b>Arbalister</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by anon149 :</small><br><br>The fact that Bell got the CRTC to delay this measn that they are waiting for the public to forget about this issue so that the CRTC won't have the public's opinion in mind when it rules in favour of Bell.<br> </div>Delay?<br><br>You seem to have an overblown idea of how long it takes the CRTC to move on anything.  Oct 31 is hardly delayed, in fact I'd put them well ahead fo schedule if they come up with a decision by then.  Why, that's only 7 months from the date of filing.  They've barely had time to talk about it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20940682</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:15:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20939989</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Bell must have booked golf rounds until the end of september to play golf with CRTC employees, which means they can't start  working on the issue until after golfing season.<br><br>The really sad part about this is that Bell is probably buying golf rounds at charitable tournaments and as a result, get to have "charitable donation" status in its tax  filings for its lobbying efforts.<br> <br>Also, Bell wants to make sure all key politicians are back in town so it can wine and dine them to ensure they apply pressure to the CRTC for a proper resolution of the matter in Bell's favour.<br><br>As far as CAIP is concerned, I don't expect anything from them. My guess is that they are hoping the CRTC will be "nice" and rule in their favour.<br><br>If CAIP had taken out full page ads in major newspapers to explain what Bell is doing (factually), the public uproar would be such that Harper would tell the CRTC to rule on this ASAP, and make sure public opinion is satisfied.<br><br>Prentice got involved in the SMS thing because this was widely known by the public. He didn't get involved in the throttling because it was just a small bunch of geeks who got mad about it. <br><br>CAIP needs to learn, hopefully before Oct 31, that the CRTC isn't "nice", it doesn't rule for the right thing, it implements government policies, and unless there is a really massive uproar from the *general public*, the governmnet will want Bell to be succesfull.<br><br>Remember that Bell has a lot of negotiating power at this point in time. "If you let us keep the throttling, we'll lay off 1000 fewer employess come December 11th when we go private and never again have to report to anyone what we are doing".<br><br>The fact that Bell got the CRTC to delay this measn that they are waiting for the public to forget about this issue so that the CRTC won't have the public's opinion in mind when it rules in favour of Bell.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20939989</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:59:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20939102</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Keep in mind this is only a "proposed" date. It can drag on. Bell can centainly add more fule to this to make it drag on.<br><br>Also, there has to be another battle coming to prevent teksavvy from turning into a mini-bell.<br><br>So this is just a proposed date for round one.<br><br>As for round two (the mini-bell fight), nothing has been submitted to the CRTC yet, if there will be.<br><br>Lawyer bills are racking up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20939102</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:06:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938796</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1372899"><b>MrShag</b></A> : mmmm Bananas and timbits??]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938796</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:08:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938710</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1109355"><b>DabberDan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  bryanviper <A HREF="/useremail/u/702949"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>we need somebody on the inside to find out whats really going on in there. I say we get rocky to get a job in there so he can kick some ass!<br> </div>Where's wikileaks when you need 'em ? ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938710</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:53:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938702</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/702949"><b>bryanviper</b></A> : we need somebody on the inside to find out whats really going on in there. I say we get rocky to get a job in there so he can kick some ass!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938702</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:52:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938641</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1540539"><b>HoboJ</b></A> : I've always been baffled with bureaucratic process. It's just amazing that it takes multiple months just to decide yes or no. For all we bloody know the CRTC will flip a coin around a bong and get their answer from that. This is a nightmare waiting to happen for the internet in Canada.  :huh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938641</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:39:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938586</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/706116"><b>The Flash</b></A> : Trick or Treat<br>Smell my Feet<br>Give Me Something Good to Eat]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938586</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:29:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938577</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/273051"><b>HiVolt</b></A> : My god, October 31st???!!! That's ridiculous.<br><small>--<br>,,!,,('-'),,!,,</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938577</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:27:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938538</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1109355"><b>DabberDan</b></A> : Here's to no tricks and only treating on Oct 31st...<br><br>I just looked at my calendar as I was adding the date on it, this is on a Friday (probably will be done late in the day too).<br><br>They'll have a buffer of two days for whatever decision they take. Chickens.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938538</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:21:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938386</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : CAIP's lobby person should have by now <strike>paid the CRTC</strike> donated a few hookers, unlimited booze, unlimited food in the best restaurants, and a vacation chalet in the south of france on a vineyard to cover "expenses".<br><br>If not, well we know how this will end already.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938386</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:55:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938331</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1372899"><b>MrShag</b></A> : get yur <strike>bribes</strike>..er donations in!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938331</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:44:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938286</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Per the new posting on the CRTC website(&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/8622/c51_200805153.htm" >www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/&middot;&middot;&middot;5153.htm</A>) they expect to have a ruling on Oct. 31st.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20938286</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:35:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
