hottboiinnc
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
 ·Time Warner Cable
·buckeye cable
| reply to bogey780
Re: Congrats
I meant T does not know how to build an brand new network this size. If they did they would have done it right the first time. you and i both know it comes down to them putting the cost on someone else later on down the road. I don't know why you just don't admit that they don't give a damn.
If T knew how to build out a brand new next Generation network they would have skipped the DSL and the copper and went to FTTH. Not the other way around. |
|
bogey780
join:2004-03-19
Here | reply to hottboiinnc
'AT$T doesnt know how to build a network this size either.'
I'll just highlight that sentence and cut out there. Yea, T has no experience in nationwide telco deployment. |
|
hottboiinnc
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
·Time Warner Cable
·buckeye cable
| reply to bogey780
AT$T doesnt know how to build a network this size either. IF they did they would be building out FTTH instead of their crappy DSL service.
Give it up. we both know that the cable companies will pound T's DSL out of the water before they can even start to offer it to entire cities.
Cable companies are already upgrading their networks and T is slowly doing it. The cable company here where i live has already upgraded speeds once this year and is preparing to do it again soon with DOCSIS 3. and where is T? Still trying to install their crappy VARDs on the corners hoping they can get people to sign up.
Their one thing sounds funny though 700 homes per VARD. Why do i see them on almost every corner in Toledo? Especially in my area? If that was true I wouldnt need to see as many.
Sounds again like someone at T doesnt know what in the hell their talking about.
But as far as affordable! HA! Why is their product priced so much higher than anyone else's? Because even one of their spokespersons said they do NOT compete on price. They compete on product which is a laugh there! they really do not have one!
They limit the amount of streams of TV you can watch and their service is capped at 10/1 for pretty much ever because the only way to compete with anyone is to RE-build out again. Which means more $$$$ from the stockholders and more $$$ from the customers in higher bills. Nobody is going to keep paying for T's screw ups.
Ed is gone they need to scrap the DSL shit and move over to FTTH if they wanna stay in the game. |
|
bogey780
join:2004-03-19
Here
| reply to hottboiinnc
And what training in telecommunications do you have? If you don't know how a network works, how can you expect people to take advice from you on how to build one?
Sure, T could listen to you, and make sure that they make sure no one gets upgraded except a few places. And at a premium rate. Or they could hook up more houses with an affordable quality product. |
|
hottboiinnc
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
·Time Warner Cable
·buckeye cable
| reply to bogey780
an untested system? how do you figure FTTH by T is untested. They have several markets around the Country that are fully FTTH. My friend is in one in Monroe County MI. Full FTTH build out.
It must not be much if T can afford to build that out and it works fine to this day. hmmmm untested yep sure it is.
but go figure a T employee defending them on a stupid move. and expanding DSL! WTF! Why would you worry about expanding DSL when they should be bringing in something that can compete with DOCSIS 3.0. T is gonna be up a shi& creek when DOCSIS 3 hits their markets. Especially when they have to go out and REBUILD the network AGAIN!
Shareholders will not be happy. |
|
