Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Fight Brews Over FCC's Plan For Smut-Free National Wireless » Free WiFi would look like this
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
247
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Savvy 5 year olds? »
« Snowball's chance...  
AuthorAll Replies


GOLFnSUN
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


2 edits
 Free WiFi would look like this

Snapped 2008-08-13 13:38:37

»pbskids.org/


Snapped 2008-08-13 13:38:20

»www.webkinz.com/us_en/


Now these are great for 5 year olds, but the free part of this nationwide system will be worthless for 90% of the users. So what M2Z is asking for is FREE spectrum so they can sell their 3 mbps tier at $30/mo that can show porn, news, social sites, etc. that aren't appropriate for 5 yr olds.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

bbenso1

join:2004-11-28
Baltimore, MD

said by GOLFnSUN See Profile :

So what M2Z is asking for is FREE spectrum so they can sell their 3 mbps tier at $30/mo that can show porn.
Not FREE. M2Z would pay the government 5% of their revenue. So instead of getting one payment up front the government would be getting recurring revenue as long as the company stays in business.


Matt
Gone playing Dragon Age Origins
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
reply to GOLFnSUN
That is exactly what I was thinking Tk.

Not to mention, 10 years to build out 3Mbps? 10 years ago most of us were still on DIAL-UP! 3Mbps will be the equivalent of dial-up by then, not to mention 384Kbps.


Matt
Gone playing Dragon Age Origins
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

reply to bbenso1
said by bbenso1 See Profile :

said by GOLFnSUN See Profile :

So what M2Z is asking for is FREE spectrum so they can sell their 3 mbps tier at $30/mo that can show porn.
Not FREE. M2Z would pay the government 5% of their revenue. So instead of getting one payment up front the government would be getting recurring revenue as long as the company stays in business.
Yes free. If they don't make money (or use creative accounting to hide it) they don't pay the Government a dime.

I am all for unseating the incumbents and releasing their stranglehold on the last mile, but this is a terrible use of the spectrum. I have to agree with the FCC on this one for once.

bbenso1

join:2004-11-28
Baltimore, MD

said by Matt See Profile :

said by bbenso1 See Profile :

said by GOLFnSUN See Profile :

So what M2Z is asking for is FREE spectrum so they can sell their 3 mbps tier at $30/mo that can show porn.
Not FREE. M2Z would pay the government 5% of their revenue. So instead of getting one payment up front the government would be getting recurring revenue as long as the company stays in business.
Yes free. If they don't make money (or use creative accounting to hide it) they don't pay the Government a dime.
Incorrect. 5% of REVENUE, not 5% of PROFIT. If they bring in $1 million and have operating costs of $2 million they would still owe the government 5% of that $1 million even though they actually made no money.

So, the only way that the government would see no money from this deal would be if M2Z had absolutely zero income. If that were the case I can guarantee that the company wouldn't be around for long and then the government would get their spectrum back.


Matt
Gone playing Dragon Age Origins
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

said by bbenso1 See Profile :

Incorrect. 5% of REVENUE, not 5% of PROFIT. If they bring in $1 million and have operating costs of $2 million they would still owe the government 5% of that $1 million even though they actually made no money.

So, the only way that the government would see no money from this deal would be if M2Z had absolutely zero income. If that were the case I can guarantee that the company wouldn't be around for long and then the government would get their spectrum back.
Did you read the filing? This only applies to their "Premium Offering" subscription service. And they "may" offer it. It doesn't say they HAVE to. They can plaster the free service ads or any number of creative schemes to make money that is exempt and never offer a premium service.
-
Forums » Fight Brews Over FCC's Plan For Smut-Free National WirelessSavvy 5 year olds? »
« Snowball's chance...  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 14:09:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [90] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [89] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [86] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [47] Government Will Release Some Telco Wiretap Lobbying Documents
· [34] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [17] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [15] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [13] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
· [12] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· House inspector failed to find major gas leak [Home Repair & Improvement]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· Replace entry door [Home Repair & Improvement]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Wood floor opinion... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· More MLPPP goodness [TekSavvy]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· Slow speed lately? [TekSavvy]