Re: Free WiFi would look like this

Author	All Replies
bbenso1 join:2004-11-28 Baltimore, MD	reply to TKJunkMail Re: Free WiFi would look like this said by TKJunkMail : So what M2Z is asking for is FREE spectrum so they can sell their 3 mbps tier at $30/mo that can show porn. Not FREE. M2Z would pay the government 5% of their revenue. So instead of getting one payment up front the government would be getting recurring revenue as long as the company stays in business.
bbenso1 join:2004-11-28 Baltimore, MD	to forum · permalink · · 2008-08-13 13:50:08 ·
Matt Take me down to the paradise city Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC ·North State Commun..	said by bbenso1 : said by TKJunkMail : So what M2Z is asking for is FREE spectrum so they can sell their 3 mbps tier at $30/mo that can show porn. Not FREE. M2Z would pay the government 5% of their revenue. So instead of getting one payment up front the government would be getting recurring revenue as long as the company stays in business. Yes free. If they don't make money (or use creative accounting to hide it) they don't pay the Government a dime. I am all for unseating the incumbents and releasing their stranglehold on the last mile, but this is a terrible use of the spectrum. I have to agree with the FCC on this one for once.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-08-13 13:59:39 ·
bbenso1 join:2004-11-28 Baltimore, MD	said by Matt : said by bbenso1 : said by TKJunkMail : So what M2Z is asking for is FREE spectrum so they can sell their 3 mbps tier at $30/mo that can show porn. Not FREE. M2Z would pay the government 5% of their revenue. So instead of getting one payment up front the government would be getting recurring revenue as long as the company stays in business. Yes free. If they don't make money (or use creative accounting to hide it) they don't pay the Government a dime. Incorrect. 5% of REVENUE, not 5% of PROFIT. If they bring in $1 million and have operating costs of $2 million they would still owe the government 5% of that $1 million even though they actually made no money. So, the only way that the government would see no money from this deal would be if M2Z had absolutely zero income. If that were the case I can guarantee that the company wouldn't be around for long and then the government would get their spectrum back.
bbenso1 join:2004-11-28 Baltimore, MD	to forum · permalink · · 2008-08-13 14:09:41 ·
Matt Take me down to the paradise city Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC ·North State Commun..	said by bbenso1 : Incorrect. 5% of REVENUE, not 5% of PROFIT. If they bring in $1 million and have operating costs of $2 million they would still owe the government 5% of that $1 million even though they actually made no money. So, the only way that the government would see no money from this deal would be if M2Z had absolutely zero income. If that were the case I can guarantee that the company wouldn't be around for long and then the government would get their spectrum back. Did you read the filing? This only applies to their "Premium Offering" subscription service. And they "may" offer it. It doesn't say they HAVE to. They can plaster the free service ads or any number of creative schemes to make money that is exempt and never offer a premium service.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-08-13 14:25:50 ·


Wednesday, 02-Dec 20:31:32	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF