Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Fight Brews Over FCC's Plan For Smut-Free National Wireless » Free WiFi would look like this
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Savvy 5 year olds? »
« Snowball's chance...  
AuthorAll Replies

bbenso1

join:2004-11-28
Baltimore, MD

reply to Matt
Re: Free WiFi would look like this

said by Matt See Profile :

said by bbenso1 See Profile :

said by GOLFnSUN See Profile :

So what M2Z is asking for is FREE spectrum so they can sell their 3 mbps tier at $30/mo that can show porn.
Not FREE. M2Z would pay the government 5% of their revenue. So instead of getting one payment up front the government would be getting recurring revenue as long as the company stays in business.
Yes free. If they don't make money (or use creative accounting to hide it) they don't pay the Government a dime.
Incorrect. 5% of REVENUE, not 5% of PROFIT. If they bring in $1 million and have operating costs of $2 million they would still owe the government 5% of that $1 million even though they actually made no money.

So, the only way that the government would see no money from this deal would be if M2Z had absolutely zero income. If that were the case I can guarantee that the company wouldn't be around for long and then the government would get their spectrum back.


Matt
Gone playing Dragon Age Origins
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

said by bbenso1 See Profile :

Incorrect. 5% of REVENUE, not 5% of PROFIT. If they bring in $1 million and have operating costs of $2 million they would still owe the government 5% of that $1 million even though they actually made no money.

So, the only way that the government would see no money from this deal would be if M2Z had absolutely zero income. If that were the case I can guarantee that the company wouldn't be around for long and then the government would get their spectrum back.
Did you read the filing? This only applies to their "Premium Offering" subscription service. And they "may" offer it. It doesn't say they HAVE to. They can plaster the free service ads or any number of creative schemes to make money that is exempt and never offer a premium service.
-
Forums » Fight Brews Over FCC's Plan For Smut-Free National WirelessSavvy 5 year olds? »
« Snowball's chance...  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 18:38:09 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [112] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [93] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [86] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [64] Government Will Release Some Telco Wiretap Lobbying Documents
· [51] Verizon's Hanging Up On Rural America
· [34] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [27] Verizon's Higher ETFs Annoy Senator
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [23] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [19] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· House inspector failed to find major gas leak [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· Live feed of MW2 playing PC version [PC gaming GAMES]
· [northeast] Comparison of FiOS Broadband Internet to Comcast Bla [Verizon Fiber Optics]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· Holy work line speeds!! [TekSavvy]