<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage in Rogers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20949901</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:54:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:54:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21138492</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><b>sbrook</b></A> : Beyond a doubt, Rogers got wind that Bell was intending to throttle, but remember that Rogers has been throttling for the last 4 years!  <br><br>Here's one of the first threads in the Rogers forum with hints that they were throttling<br><br>  &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,10371703">switched to EXTREME now torrents are SLOW!>?!?</A><br><br>So, this isn't a Bell planned so Rogers did thing (like the game they played with byte caps a few years back!)  Rogers has been at this a LONG time ... to solve the problem of overloaded upstream on the cable segments.<br><br>Bell is doing it to "supposedly" ease peak time bandwidth congestion.  Even if CAIP gets agreement from the CRTC (and I'm kind of skeptical too), Bell will not stop throttling their own customers because it's nothing to do with that, and Rogers can present valid technical reasons for throttling .. it's a well documented problem on cable systems.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21138492</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:39:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21138123</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1511161"><b>Stewy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  sbrook <A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Rogers remained adamant that it was going to throttle and that was that.<br></div>As if they didn't know what Bell was cooking at the time, c'mon...<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  sbrook <A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Moreover, if you follow the whole story, there is a definite technical reason for throttling on a cable network ... <br> </div>I'm not going to rehash this again but sbrook let's but a BF on this thread and revisit it 60 days after the CRTC ruling and specially if it goes in CAIP's favor which I doubt will.<br><small>--<br>It's all... part of the plan.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21138123</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:35:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21134019</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><b>sbrook</b></A> : Well, there was a huge protest about Rogers throttling when they started doing it a couple years ago.  Rogers remained adamant that it was going to throttle and that was that.  No 3rd party competition was involved either.<br><br>Moreover, if you follow the whole story, there is a definite technical reason for throttling on a cable network ... it may not be popular, but it has ensured that there are far fewer performance complaints in this forum in the last 18 months than ever before.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21134019</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:47:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21132708</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1511161"><b>Stewy</b></A> : The difference between Bell and Rogers is that Bell is forcing a throttle on other DSL wholesalers giving them an unfair advantage. Bell and Rogers can do whatever they want but just don't force others to accept your unethical business model.<br><br>If CAIP wins their CRTC submission on throttling it won't take long for Rogers and Bell for that matter to miraculously find a solution to *cough* network congestion.<br><br>Just think for 1 second what type of internet you would have if you only had Rogers and Bell and that's why I support CAIP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21132708</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:37:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21132429</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582547"><b>Sempronius</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Stewy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1511161"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Austin007 <A HREF="/useremail/u/662682"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br></div>apparently everyone is, this is deplorable and unacceptable, another example of ethics gone wrong with the Telco's.<br><br>If they need to do this, they should give you an option for you to receive this through email.<br> </div>I agree with you Stewy, however, what is "good for the goose is good for the gander"<br><br>I don't see a public backlash against Rogers for throttling their customer's and using Deep Packet Inspection.  It appears to be acceptable amongst Rogers customer's.  While scores of customer's are leaving Bell Canada for throttling their customer's and customer's of 3rd Party Wholesalers and for using DPI, I've yet to see the same public backlash against Rogers. <br><br>In the past 6 months that I've been following this issue with Bell Canada, read the numerous posts from angry customer's fed up with Bell Canada, I've not yet seen a filing on the CRTC's website against Rogers for committing the same crime as Bell Canada; throttling their customer's.  Nor has their been a filing with the CAIP or any member of Parliament.  <br><br>What Rogers is doing with the use of Deep Packet Inspection and throttling their customer's  may appear to be <i>deplorable and unacceptable</i>, it appears to be <i><b>acceptable</i></b> where Rogers customer's are concerned. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21132429</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:54:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130098</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1511161"><b>Stewy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Austin007 <A HREF="/useremail/u/662682"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Anyone else getting these anoying page headers?<br> </div>apparently everyone is, this is deplorable and unacceptable, another example of ethics gone wrong with the Telco's.<br><br>If they need to do this, they should give you an option for you to receive this through email.<br><small>--<br>It's all... part of the plan.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21130098</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:37:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21127770</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/662682"><b>Austin007</b></A> : Anyone else getting these anoying page headers?<br><A HREF="http://imageshack.us"> <IMG SRC="http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/3522/p1030382bx5.jpg" width=880> </a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21127770</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:28:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053181</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I cancelled my Rogers connection at the end of July. My Final invoice had a 25$ charge for bandwidth for June 15 - July. I phoned, complained that their monitor wasn't accurate and they reversed the charge. Recieved another bill today for 14 dollars, 7 gigs over limit. Even though I recieved a previous bill labelled "Final Bill" - the CSR claimed it was for the last 14 days of July. Complained that it was BS and they credited my account for the amount.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21053181</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:02:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21042097</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : to answer the questin above, yes it is on all Tiers for 25$ max, EXCEPT the older  grandfathered Lite and ultra lite, the bandwidth cap is higher on these but there is no ceiling to the charges.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21042097</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:31:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20995002</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : not in my area (scarborough)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20995002</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:25:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20991102</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1316994"><b>Wolf Fu</b></A> : Can you tell if the throttling is relaxed? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20991102</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:57:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20980094</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/581584"><b>Leathal</b></A> : This is not new, if you had read the mail you get from Rogers you would have known this. I am pretty sure it was also meantioned here some months ago too...<br><br>Leathal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20980094</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:28:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20975957</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I have High Speed Lite (not grandfathered).<br>25 GB/month limit.<br><br>If I go over the limit, lets say 40-50 gb extra, they will only charge me $25, right?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20975957</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:47:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20955407</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : i used 40gb extra ($2/gb)<br>but they will charge you for $25 only (for all tiers I think, i am using express)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20955407</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:38:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20952537</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/939075"><b>Jaguar</b></A> : Extra charge was $25, making the total bill $83.95.<br><br>I used about 60 gb over the limit]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20952537</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:15:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20950620</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1511161"><b>Stewy</b></A> : give us numbers, how much was it ?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20950620</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:54:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rogers starts to charge extra internet usage</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20949901</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Just got my invoices yesterday, and additional usage from June 3 - July 2 was charged.  <br><br>I called Rogers, they said the statement "For invoices prior to July 3, 2008, we will refund any additional use charges. Invoices created after July 3 will have actual additional use charges from your previous month of service" applies to invoices only.  My additional charge was shown on my July-Aug invoices. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20949901</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:32:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
