republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Pentagon puts hold on USAF cyber effort
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
399
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Security Software Updates 16 Aug 2008 »
« Which Free A/V ?  
AuthorAll Replies
-


Blackbird
Built for Speed
Premium
join:2005-01-14
Fort Wayne, IN
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to scelli
Re: Pentagon puts hold on USAF cyber effort

said by scelli See Profile :

said by DownTheShore See Profile :

So typical. All branches of the military vying for their slice of the pie and credit, instead of each doing what they do best, and letting one branch concentrate on cyberspace and letting it be the best it can be in that area.
Unfortunately, the more things change the more they stay the same. Counterproductive inter-service rivalries are well documented throughout the history of the U.S armed forces as well as within the armed forces of numerous other nations. ...
Seems to be the "American Way"... and it's not just inter-service rivalry. Just as often, it's intra-service rivalry. Ask anyone intimately familiar just what really killed the USAF SR-71 program... twice! And it was supposed to be a "national asset".
--
If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see...


scelli
Native New Yorker
Premium
join:1999-08-07
USA

reply to DownTheShore
said by DownTheShore See Profile :

So typical. All branches of the military vying for their slice of the pie and credit, instead of each doing what they do best, and letting one branch concentrate on cyberspace and letting it be the best it can be in that area.
Unfortunately, the more things change the more they stay the same. Counterproductive inter-service rivalries are well documented throughout the history of the U.S armed forces as well as within the armed forces of numerous other nations. I'm not talking about the standard stuff wherein troops from different branches sound off to each other in a derogatory manner, either. Such behavior in the enlisted ranks is a put-on almost always without exception because the jaw-jacking and running of sewers is done with genuine fondness. Anyone who has ever worn the uniform knows this is true.

However, get the ranking staff brass from each branch together in a command room and watch the sparks fly. I'm told it is truly a sight to behold.
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters!


DownTheShore
Maddie Knows Poopie
Premium
join:2003-12-02
Beautiful NJ
clubs:

reply to Its a Secret
So typical. All branches of the military vying for their slice of the pie and credit, instead of each doing what they do best, and letting one branch concentrate on cyberspace and letting it be the best it can be in that area.
--
Patriotism is not waving a flag, it is living the ideals

SUMware
Premium
join:2002-05-21

reply to Its a Secret
»www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20080812_7995.php
The Cyber Command, headed by Maj. Gen. William Lord, touted on its Web site its capabilities to “secure our nation by employing world-class cyberspace capabilities” and had ambitious plans to have a cyber command presence in all 50 states.

The Cyber Command hyped its capabilities on TV, in Web video advertisements and in a series of high-profile presentations conducted by Lord. The hard sell may have been the undoing of the Cyber Command, which seemed to be a grab by the Air Force to take the lead role in cyberspace. Both the Army and Navy have similar expertise in cyber operations, service sources said.

Philip Coyle, senior adviser with the Center for Defense Information, a security policy research group in Washington, said he believes the Navy’s Network Warfare Command and the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center have led the way in cyberspace. The Army engages in cyberspace operations daily in Afghanistan and Iraq, said Coyle, who served as assistant secretary of Defense and director of its operational test and evaluation office from 1994 to 2001.

The decision to ratchet back the Cyber Command may have come from Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who wants to see a greater role for the Navy in cyberspace, said an Air Force source. Coyle speculated that the Air Force may have been too public in pushing the Cyber Command and is now suffering from its own hubris.
»www.securityfocus.com/brief/799
Other services also have cyberspace capabilities and the National Security Agency has taken an active role in cyber operations, including a broad, and controversial, wiretapping program.


GILXA1226
Premium,MVM
join:2000-12-29
London, OH
clubs:

reply to SUMware
said by SUMware See Profile :

The effort has more than likely just been hidden away as an NSA black-box project.
NSA != USAF. The USAF has had a wing designated for this task for quite a while, it has just been recently that they decided to elevate it to a command level. The Army and Navy have similar units, however they have not yet decided to raise them like the Air Force is proposing to do. I would also imaging that the NSA, CIA and FBI have their own cyber divisions as well.

SUMware
Premium
join:2002-05-21

1 edit
reply to Its a Secret
The effort has more than likely just been hidden away as an NSA black-box project.


GILXA1226
Premium,MVM
join:2000-12-29
London, OH
clubs:

reply to Its a Secret
This was expected after the Secretary of the Air Force was forced out. The Cyber command was his 'baby' if you will. My guess is that eventually the Cyber Command will still happen, especially with everything that has been going on with Russia/Georga, China and PRK's attacks, along with all the other countries that are learning that cheap hardware can be used to cause lots of havoc.
--
We don't give a d@mn for the whole state of Michigan... we're from OHIO! O!H! ... I!O!


rcdailey
Dragoonfly
Premium
join:2005-03-29
Rialto, CA
reply to Its a Secret
I'm getting the feeling that the Pentagon (or Mr. Gates) is trying to get rid of the USAF.


Its a Secret
Whatever
Premium
join:2008-02-23
U B Funny
·Shaw

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Pentagon this week delayed and may kill the Air Force's nascent Cyberspace Command, according to a memo obtained by The Associated Press. This comes as Russia used a major computer network attack to begin its assault on Georgia.

The service's Cyberspace Command is meant to coordinate computer network defense and, more controversially, offensive attacks on enemy networks.

»apnews.excite.com/article/200808···HG1.html
--
"In the future, that which is not mandatory will be illegal"
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecuritySecurity Software Updates 16 Aug 2008 »
« Which Free A/V ?  


Monday, 30-Nov 10:50:29 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [19] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [15] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [13] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· filling an in-ground pool [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]