| reply to MLPPP_not4ever
Re: Cancelled Sympatico - Interesting Retention Script said by MLPPP_not4ever :
What is this feature? Enforcement of 1 PPPoE session per DSLAM port/VPI&VCI/SC-VLAN. The MLPPP workaround works even on a single pppoe connection. I use it, I have one DSL line, one modem, one pppoe connection. My modem actually establishes the connection. I have created a pppoe connection icon in Vista, and told it to allow MLPPP ... but I never tell it to connect. Haven't been throttled since I set it up - and I've reversed it to test and found that the throttle is as healthy as ever. |
|
| As I said, this is a future thing to allow better per-subscriber allocation because when the control of the speed moves to the BRAS having a per-circuit or vlan throughput from the current sync profile method. And therefore many carriers are now either doing this or plan to do it.
I have also heard than in RFP's for several North American ILECS the ability to limit PPPoE sessions per port or VCI/VPI is required.
outer-vlan on a per-subscriber link (VDSL2/ADSL2+ + G.Bond or FTTP) and inner VLAN config
----------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
xMbps ISP pipe w/1PPPoE concurrent session limit
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
xMbps IPTV pipe using DHCP option 82, IP's restricted to amount of STB's on account. VLAN'd.
------------------------------
Flexible Multicast broadcast sub-pipe, interleaved
------------------------------
Flexible Unicast burst/control/VoD sub-pipe, fastpath
------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
SIP/IMS Voice stream pipe, High QoS, VLAN'd, private IP space
--------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
You wouldn't buy 100's of DPI devices to let them be "defeated" by flashing a $40 router. And this is a simple flick of the switch solution. |
|
 mlernerPremium
join:2000-11-25
Nepean, ON
kudos:5
1 edit | said by MLPPP_not4ever :
You wouldn't buy 100's of DPI devices to let them be "defeated" by flashing a $40 router. And this is a simple flick of the switch solution.
Unfortunately, at the current state the DPI devices can't defeat MLPPP and no software updates on the horizon. They can limit to one login but that doesn't mean much since we can still defeat throttling.
EDIT: I should mention, MLPPP can be done on a single link. |
|
