<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: 300MB&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20956888</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:05:01 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:05:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 300MB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20957980</link>
<description><![CDATA[DustySilicon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1394754" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1394754');">karlmarx</a>:</small><br><br>Do the math. That's $8.00/GB/month. Hell, that make COMCRAP look good, which is about $0.28 cents per GB. Of course, neither of them hold a candle to FIOS, which cost $0.00184 (1/10 of a penny) cents per month per GB. So hughesnet costs 28 times MORE than Comcrap, and 4,320 times more than FIOS on a PER GB basis. If that's not an argument for a real nationwide FIOS rollout, I don't know what is.</div>Sprint/Verizon/AT&T and their 5GB cap or should I say FAP, charges $12 per GB... so Hughes would be a bargain... nah, I was just kidding.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20957980</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:51:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 300MB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20957292</link>
<description><![CDATA[Sircolby45 posted : Uh they don't serve all of their customers that amount of bandwidth with just one satellite. Spaceway 3 is just their most recent satellite. So it would actually be more.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20957292</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:13:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 300MB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20957234</link>
<description><![CDATA[Xizer posted : You can download 15 GB a month with a dial-up connection.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20957234</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:59:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 300MB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20957115</link>
<description><![CDATA[karlmarx posted : Do the math. That's $8.00/GB/month. Hell, that make COMCRAP look good, which is about $0.28 cents per GB. Of course, neither of them hold a candle to FIOS, which cost $0.00184 (1/10 of a penny) cents per month per GB. So hughesnet costs 28 times MORE than Comcrap, and 4,320 times more than FIOS on a PER GB basis. If that's not an argument for a real nationwide FIOS rollout, I don't know what is.<br><br>In other terms get 28 hughes satellites and you can hit comcraps 250GB Cap. Get 4,320 satellites, and you can hit what  the 'average' FIOS can do in a month.<br><small>--<br>The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20957115</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:33:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 300MB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20956988</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : I hate to rain on the parade here. But the numbers in the article are <b><u>PER DAY</u></b> and not <i>per month</i> as said<b>(since corrected)</b> in the BBR news post: &raquo;<A HREF="/shownews/HughesNet-Lowers-Caps-97011">HughesNet Lowers 'FAP' Caps</A><br>    <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>HughesNet actually lowered the <b>monthly consumption limit</b> for some users on their most popular Pro (1Mbps, $70) tier from <b>375 MB <u>per month</u></b> to 300 MB.<hr></blockquote><br><br>Here is the info from the HughsNet web site:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.hughes.com/HUGHES/Rooms/DisplayPages/LayoutInitial?pageid=fairaccess&Container=com.webridge.entity.Entity[OID[BD8BE0839F414B4FB7CDDCA10EFA5369]]" >www.hughes.com/HUGHES/Rooms/Disp&middot;&middot;&middot;FA5369]]</A><br><div class="bquote">Hughes assigns a download threshold to each service plan that <b>limits the amount of data that may be downloaded <u>during a typical day</u>. </b></div>While even the daily caps are somewhat low, they don't require the panic based on the assertion that they were MONTHLY numbers.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20956988</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:07:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 300MB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20956986</link>
<description><![CDATA[Chris 313 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/648660" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=648660');">acadiel</a>:</small><br><br>300MB - a month?<br><br>Now, that's insane.  It makes the Verizon/Sprint/AT&T 5GB caps on their Aircards look like its generous.<br><br>If I were in a  VZ/Sprint/AT&T coverage area and it was only satellite versus using a cell carrier, I'd get the cell carrier and one of those Linksys routers where you plug the PC Card into.<br> </div>I agree. What are these people smoking that makes 300MB a day or worse, a month seem resonable. I just downloaded a 952MB demo off PSN and at 300MB in a day or month, I'd have blown right through that.<br><br>In a situation like this, I'd rather have dial up or nothing and save my money for a move elsewhere to where I could get a better connection.<br><br>The money paid for these tiers, the caps are rediculous. Now I see that Comcast and their doings are not bad at all. <br><br>These people have it much worse.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20956986</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:06:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 300MB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20956981</link>
<description><![CDATA[djrobx posted : I think he meant per day, or more specifically, "within a 24 hour time period".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20956981</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:05:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 300MB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20956934</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kearnstd posted : i can burn up 300mb in a day without WoW, Vent, and Torrents.  i mean Youtube alone could burn that up.<br><small>--<br>[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-300MB-20956934</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:56:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>300MB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/300MB-20956888</link>
<description><![CDATA[acadiel posted : 300MB - a month?<br><br>Now, that's insane.  It makes the Verizon/Sprint/AT&T 5GB caps on their Aircards look like its generous.<br><br>If I were in a  VZ/Sprint/AT&T coverage area and it was only satellite versus using a cell carrier, I'd get the cell carrier and one of those Linksys routers where you plug the PC Card into.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.guidry.org/newbbs">acadiel's blog is here</a><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/300MB-20956888</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:45:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

