<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance? in Wireless Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20961224</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:42:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:42:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21037441</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/431519"><b>Anav</b></A> : Yes, I asked for a captive portal feature but it did not get into the mix.  Its a matter of volume usage to add a feature, at that price point every penny counts.  I was basically asking for an on-board SSL type authentication list, so no need to use an external server, and would protect password and user name.  Could be useful in many situations.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21037441</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:56:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21017692</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>It has a guest wifi with only a connection to the internet, separate from the LAN wifi.<hr></blockquote>If you need to run WEP this is the best way to do it.  That way you will only lose internet bandwidth (unless the bandwidth thief is doing something illegal with the stolen bandwidth).  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21017692</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:22:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21017672</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>For now it&#8217;ll keep most, if not all, of his neighbors away<hr></blockquote>Only if the neighbors don't want in anyway.  When using WEP anyone who wants in will get in.  How long it takes depends on how fast they read the articles describing how to get in and how long it takes them to download the tools to get in.<br><br>As long as people using WEP understand that it is basically no security at all there is not a problem.  It is people who think WEP makes them security who are most at risk.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21017672</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:19:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21015836</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357530"><b>Bink</b></A> : Thanks/very cool.  So while it can&#146;t act as a captive portal, you can still set bandwidth restrictions on your guests.<br><br>Nice little feature you don&#146;t see often.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21015836</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:08:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21015773</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/867111"><b>cgeek5467</b></A> : bink<br><br>info on nbg334w<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.zyxel.com/web/product_family_detail.php?PC1indexflag=20040520161313&CategoryGroupNo=D6E54FEE-BE55-46BB-B3DB-29E3361862EE" >www.zyxel.com/web/product_family&middot;&middot;&middot;361862EE</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21015773</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:56:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21013712</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357530"><b>Bink</b></A> : Does it have a mechanism to authenticate these guests?  How about throttling their bandwidth?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21013712</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:23:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21013495</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/431519"><b>Anav</b></A> : That is one of the reasons I would recommend the NBG334W or similarly featured home routers. It has a guest wifi with only a connection to the internet, separate from the LAN wifi.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21013495</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:12:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21012407</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357530"><b>Bink</b></A> : If his device only supports WEP, he doesn&#146;t have much of a choice.  For now it&#146;ll keep most, if not all, of his neighbors away.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21012407</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:55:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21012336</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>I decided to use WEP<hr></blockquote>Why bother.  The trivial amount of effort it takes to bypass WEP makes the effort to enable it seem like a waste of time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21012336</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:41:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21011177</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1491765"><b>LastXdeth</b></A> : I decided to use WEP  :o because my friend's Nintendo DS can only us WEP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21011177</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:53:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20977084</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1232383"><b>peter_m</b></A> : Come on guys, WEP or WPA will generate some but minimal overhead. You won't notice the difference unless you have an older router or network cards that have a "bad" implementation of WPA that slows things down or causes the router to reboot. But if you have the WRT54G, you are golden! For older equipment, WPA-tkip is easier to implement then WPA-aes.<br><br>Go WPA and sleep well at knight knowing no one can get in! Just use a long enough key.<br><br>Peter<br><br>EDIT: Linksis WRT54G, depending on your version, this firmware couldbe more stable for you. &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato" >www.polarcloud.com/tomato</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20977084</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:56:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20976412</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/950766"><b>BooBooBear</b></A> : I use a Linksys and WPA and never notice any "overhead". I have a 6.0 mb DSL plan.  <br><br>    You can also turn off the "broadcast ssid info" to keep nosey people from seeing if your wireless AND change the DEFAULT router name.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20976412</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:30:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20966894</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/772729"><b>Nerdtalker</b></A> : WPA2 simply mandates AES. There are a number of other changes, but for your PSK implementation that's really all that you'll need to be concerned about. I'd recommend using AES either way. The length of the PSK is really what matters. <br><br>No, this doesn't affect gaming. Honestly, I never ever ever game over WiFi to begin with if it's anything really latency sensitive (FPS, RTS, e.t.c.). I guess you could get away with MMOs and the like, but, I just spare myself the frustration in general. There's a certain amount of potential for random latency introduced which is inherent in wireless itself.<br><br>Yes, I'm sure there's overhead  Bink <A HREF="/useremail/u/1357530"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>. The point is that it's so negligible it's impossible to really differentiate from interference/normal throughput drops from the fact that the interfaces are wireless to begin with.<br><small>--<br>"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn<br><br>I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com<br><b>Spam: 12900+</b> messages currently using 406 MB.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20966894</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:59:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20963818</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357530"><b>Bink</b></A> : The truth is, there is overhead.  Assuming modern hardware, it&#146;s about 1-4 percent, which, I said, is negligible, but it will be higher if the encryption is done in software.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20963818</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:01:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20963236</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1491765"><b>LastXdeth</b></A> : Oh, then I might as well use WPA. I have a Linksys WRT54G so it think this might be a fast enough router. Btw, what's the different from WPA2? Wht are TKIP or AES?. Also, do they affect gaming networks?<br><br>I'm on <A HREF="http://www3.nohold.net/noHoldCust56/Prod_6/KnowledgePortal/KPScripts/amsviewer.asp?docid=ee5ca6ff082846ca9477a2e951357e03_KB3696_EN_070328_v1.xml&amsstatsid=3846824">this</a> page right now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20963236</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:19:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20963167</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/662411"><b>SoonerAl</b></A> : Remember you can use Windows Connect Now [WCN] to configure your wireless network. WCN saves off the settings to a flash drive so you can reconfigure your clients if required or add clients easily. If your wireless access point/router or clients do not support WCN you can easily copy-n-paste the network key by opening the flash drive and navigating to the \Smrtntky\Wsetting.txt file and copying the key to the wireless access point/router or client. Links here along with my general wireless guidelines.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://theillustratednetwork.mvps.org/LAN/SoHoWirelessSecurity.html" >theillustratednetwork.mvps.org/L&middot;&middot;&middot;ity.html</A><br><br>Personally I use a 63-character random ASCII key and WPA-PSK [AES] to secure my home wireless network, ie. an XP Pro wireless desktop client and a laptop running Ubuntu or Vista Ultimate.<br><small>--<br>"When all else fails, read the instructions..."<br>MS-MVP Windows &#150; Desktop User Experience</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20963167</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:15:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20962631</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/772729"><b>Nerdtalker</b></A> : I used to wonder about WPA/WEP performance overhead myself, however there really isn't any to speak of. If your router is fast enough, there isn't any throughput hit to speak of, honestly. <br><br>Additionally, if you're going to bother implementing encryption, WEP is strongly not recommended because of its inherent insecurity and ease-of-cracking. WPA/WPA2 with either TKIP or AES and a 20 character random password (everyone has already said as much) is accepted as bulletproof right now. WEP on the other hand, is insecure.<br><br>Performance will not be degraded because there is a bit-overhead to encrypting the traffic; these schemes are 1:1. I've read a few tests and haven't seen any throughput hit to worry about.<br><small>--<br>"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn<br><br>I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com<br><b>Spam: 12900+</b> messages currently using 406 MB.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20962631</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:40:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20962138</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/431519"><b>Anav</b></A> : Really, I have never found it hard to keep it on file, like on a USB stick, well if I didnt have a device that has windows connect now that makes it even easier LOL.<br><br>As long as it isnt 0123456789 ;-)<br><br>As for 802.1X, I  would  certainly recommmend that for any office usage, especially  if handling other peoples information.  <br><br>Certificates and rolling codes certainly add another layer of security for business purposes.<br><small>--<br>Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins". <br>Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla.  Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner"<br><br><A HREF="http://www.llamaworks.ca">LlamaWorks Equipment</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20962138</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:25:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961737</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357530"><b>Bink</b></A> : Because the practicality of entering a 64 character random password every time you want to administer your device makes tons of sense.  You&#146;ve been drinking Steve Gibson&#146;s Kool-Aid for a little too long son&#151;and I&#146;m surprised you didn&#146;t recommend using 802.1x with certificates.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961737</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:44:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961636</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/431519"><b>Anav</b></A> : Other than docrice the advice here has been useless.<br><br>Use WPA-PSK or WPA2-PSK and use at least a 20 character key for the only wifi security you need to setup.<br><br>It is also recommended that you have as large as possible random ROUTER password as well.<br><br>Here is one random generator service.<br>&raquo;<small>https</small>://<A HREF="https://www.grc.com/passwords.htm">www.grc.com/passwords.htm</A><br><small>--<br>Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins". <br>Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla.  Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner"<br><br><A HREF="http://www.llamaworks.ca">LlamaWorks Equipment</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961636</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:14:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1541809"><b>docrice</b></A> : The encryption overhead involved in WPA is not going to be significant enough for you to notice either.  The only case where it may be noticeable is if in theory the card drivers are written badly.  Personally, I've never heard of such a thing.<br><br>WEP has been considered broken since 2001 and there are many free tools out there specifically designed to attack WEP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961338</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:54:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961337</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357530"><b>Bink</b></A> : If all you want to do it prevent one neighbor from connecting, do MAC filtering, just realize there is near zero security.  Otherwise, do WPA and ignore whatever performance penalty you might perceive.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961337</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:53:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961313</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1491765"><b>LastXdeth</b></A> : So WEP uses less performance, but is not great security and WPA is better, but uses more wireless performance? Is there anything that uses less overheard?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961313</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:46:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961265</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357530"><b>Bink</b></A> : Yea, but it should be close to negligible&#151;especially if you mainly use your wireless to connect to the Internet.  Then again, you&#146;ll find thousands of posts recommending WPA over WEP, and rightly so, but it&#146;ll have more overhead than WEP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961265</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:33:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Does WEP Affect Wireless Performance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961224</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1491765"><b>LastXdeth</b></A> : Hey guys. I'm going to implement WEP keys on my Linksys router because some unknown person is taking up my bandwith. I was just wondering if using a WEP affect wireless performance. What I mean is after I put the key on my wireless computer, will performance be downgraded because it has more security?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20961224</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:22:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
