aelfwyne
join:2004-01-28
Beaumont, TX
 ·RoadRunner Cable
1 edit | reply to Matt
Re: OS and Routers
And your desire to "turn it off" is indicative of the overall problem - people see IPV6 as something they don't want, god knows why. My router supports it, unfortunately my cablemodem does not.
You'd think the RIAA and MPAA would be paying off ISP's to push IPV6, as it would make linking user & machine a bit easier.
--
If it ain't broke..... You didn't overclock it enough. |
|
Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
 ·North State Commun..
| said by aelfwyne  :And your desire to "turn it off" is indicative of the overall problem - people see IPV6 as something they don't want, god knows why. My router supports it, unfortunately my cablemodem does not. I don't need it on my home network. Once my provider supports it I'll happily turn it on and run it. Right now it's unnecessary overhead. |
|
tshirt
Premium,MVM
join:2004-07-11
Snohomish, WA
·Comcast
| said by Matt : I don't need it on my home network. Once my provider supports it I'll happily turn it on and run it. Right now it's unnecessary overhead. Actually nobody needs it on their home network behind a NAT box, the problem is internet and ISP adoption, that's where the address shortages will be. |
|
