site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Steve B
Premium
join:2004-08-02
Seattle, WA

reply to no_one

Re: CWA wants national healthcare

Keyword in your reply is 'should'. People still talk and that is how I know. Also, please don't tell me what I do and do not know, you are not me. Also, people were told under the wire, that she quit. As you stated, most likely because still messing up. In the eyes of her co-workers, she was. Mistakes were still being made and she wasn't working hard.

amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Reviews:
·magicjack.com

said by Steve B:

In the eyes of her co-workers, she was. Mistakes were still being made and she wasn't working hard.
But, in that case, the union may have actually helped the company. As "no one" pointed out, there's no way you can know what transpired as the union stuck up for her. It may have caused management to follow the company's policies to document poor performance, escalate, enact a performance plan, and ultimately terminate her (although she quit first, perhaps seeing the writing on the wall.).

There's nothing wrong with having a counter-balance to require things be done by the book. That can actually prevent lawsuits concerning constructive termination. Even if it was an "at will" employment relationship, if a company has policies concerning terminations, that policy is the "law" to that company (not the looser "at will" requirements).

Mark

Thursday, 31-May 03:31:16 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics