Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » Comcast » Comcast HSI » [Speed] Comcast to throttle individual users; all protocols
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
8802
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[Connectivity] Awful Speeds and Connectivity - Philadelphia, PA »
« Linksys CM100 Modem "Unlimited Provisioning"  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 ...11 · 12 · 13
AuthorAll Replies


ChrisXP
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
Premium
join:2002-12-13
USA

reply to espaeth
Re: [Speed] Comcast to throttle individual users; all protocols

said by espaeth See Profile :

If they built it out to that level of capacity the overwhelming majority of folks would never be able to afford it, and the network would sit 90% idle.
At this rate a T3 line looks good.

When I win the lottery!
--
Zionism is a crime

»www.jewsagainstzionism.com »www.christianzionism.org


jlivingood
Premium,VIP
join:2007-10-28
Philadelphia, PA

reply to TKJunkMail
As I posted in a related thread - this may help inform the discussion (particularly the PDF below):
Folks interested in this topic may want to check out »www.comcast.net/networkmanagement/ (now and on an on-going basis for updates). One of the downloads at »downloads.comcast.net/docs/Comca···0528.pdf is also informative.

JL


gabeman

join:2001-05-03
Philadelphia, PA
clubs:
reply to TKJunkMail
I wonder how this will affect those of us who subscribe to Blast. What is the point of paying all of that money for extra speed? To get to the throttle point quicker?


Froggy

@teksavvy.com

reply to TKJunkMail
I know because living in Canada all the cities of congestion are the cities where everyone is a welfare recipient. In America this would translate into the cities where no one works and lives on food stamps. Canada pays in welfare about the same as a working person makes in earnings. Moral is if you live in a city where no one works expect to be throttled and you know who to blame.


tshirt
Premium,MVM
join:2004-07-11
Snohomish, WA
·Comcast


1 edit
reply to sturmvogel
said by sturmvogel See Profile :

said by tshirt See Profile :

..... business customer will shoulder the whole cost of their plant at extreme prices.
Why then does it get repeated over and over as an obvious choice when it is clearly not ? I wish I had a dollar for every answer that said "get a business account" when describing my Comcastic experience.
Because once the alternative,dedicated line w/service level agreement shows it's true cost, some business and heavy users will find a CC "business account" w/a limited service agreement, and maybe some bandwidth limits an acceptable mid priced alternative.
I don't think these phase will be very clearly defined, all will overlap, and acceptance will vary according to alternatives available in each area.
ComCast (or any other provider) will work hard, not to discontinue or discourage service to any customer (aquistion costs are too high) but instead attempt to upgrade/upsell them to a more appropriate level of service.
still I don't think they intend to have residential and unlimited (business) tiers, all tiers have some limitations.


sturmvogel
Obama '08

join:2008-02-07
Houston, TX

reply to gabeman
said by gabeman See Profile :

I wonder how this will affect those of us who subscribe to Blast. What is the point of paying all of that money for extra speed? To get to the throttle point quicker?
You could read your emails from Comcast accusing you of "abuse" so much sooner and faster.

Think of Comcast, in my opinion, as the motorcycle of ISPs. Fast, unreliable, should not be used in rain, can hardly carry anything and to be used only when nothing else is available. Sure it is fast, but when you would actually like to get anywhere and do anything useful you may want to use a car.

Not that I have anything against motorcycles, just my personal observation as with my Comcastic "experience".
--
Treason is a matter of dates


sturmvogel
Obama '08

join:2008-02-07
Houston, TX

reply to tshirt
said by tshirt See Profile :

said by sturmvogel See Profile :

said by tshirt See Profile :

..... business customer will shoulder the whole cost of their plant at extreme prices.
Why then does it get repeated over and over as an obvious choice when it is clearly not ? I wish I had a dollar for every answer that said "get a business account" when describing my Comcastic experience.
Because once the alternative,dedicated line w/service level agreement shows it's true cost, some business and heavy users will find a CC "business account" w/a limited service agreement, and maybe some bandwidth limits an acceptable mid priced alternative.

I believe you are missing my point here. Once the "abuse" line is invoked for heavy usage, the business class service is NOT offerred AT ALL, even if repeatedly requested.

Cost is not a factor in that discussion. What you are trying to compare is the cost of the T1 or better service with its SLA's to the CC business offerings. This comparison is of interest only as an academic exercise since it does not apply in the vast majority of cases where it could be actually useful.
--
Treason is a matter of dates


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to jlivingood
said by jlivingood See Profile :

As I posted in a related thread - this may help inform the discussion (particularly the PDF below):
Folks interested in this topic may want to check out »www.comcast.net/networkmanagement/ (now and on an on-going basis for updates). One of the downloads at »downloads.comcast.net/docs/Comca···0528.pdf is also informative.

JL
All good links. If people here in the forum take the time to read them, many of their questions on throttling will be answered.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to EG
said by EG See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

By yourself, no. But if many users on your node are doing the same, as a group you could trigger the throttling and you could then be affected.
Guy. Again, how do you know this for certain ?

I thought that an individual could trigger this (alleged) mechanism, and were going to be throttled ?

Not unless the node you are on is under congestion.
»downloads.comcast.net/docs/Comca···0528.pdf
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to trent25
said by trent25 See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

If there is NO node congestion, then no action would be taken to throttle users on that node.
That sounds fair at first look. Why throttle users if no one's experience is being affected by those heavy users as long as they stay below the 250GB cap.

But look at it from another angle. If I am on a node with very few users, I might not get throttled even if I max out my connection for an hour or 2 as long as not every user on my node does the same thing at the same time.
Now consider I am on node with loads of users, during peak hours I'm probably gonna get throttled a few minuted after I start maxing out my connection.

So how is that fair!?!
Life isn't fair. Anyone beyond their teenage years learns that unpleasant fact of life.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


CUBS_FAN
Next Year Again..

join:2005-04-28
Chicago, IL

1 edit
Comcast presents PowerBoost.

Disclaimer:
Active ingredients include Power-Decrease


sturmvogel
Obama '08

join:2008-02-07
Houston, TX

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

said by trent25 See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

If there is NO node congestion, then no action would be taken to throttle users on that node.
That sounds fair at first look. Why throttle users if no one's experience is being affected by those heavy users as long as they stay below the 250GB cap.

But look at it from another angle. If I am on a node with very few users, I might not get throttled even if I max out my connection for an hour or 2 as long as not every user on my node does the same thing at the same time.
Now consider I am on node with loads of users, during peak hours I'm probably gonna get throttled a few minuted after I start maxing out my connection.

So how is that fair!?!
Life isn't fair. Anyone beyond their teenage years learns that unpleasant fact of life.
The fact that life is not fair is not carte blanche for anyone to practice dishonesty as daily business.
--
Treason is a matter of dates


rexbinary
Mod King
Premium
join:2005-01-26
Plano, TX
reply to TKJunkMail
SO glad I have FIOS. I couldn't deal with caps and throttling.


trent25

join:2005-11-28
Philadelphia, PA

reply to jlivingood
said by jlivingood See Profile :

One of the downloads at »downloads.comcast.net/docs/Comca···0528.pdf is also informative.
It's good to see that so far Comcast is basing their heavy usage calculation on percentage use of provisioned speed and period of usage. So a customer paying more at least benefits by being throttled later, compared to a lower tier customer paying less.

I don't know if I missed it, but that presentation doesn't seem to indicate how long the decreased priority of a heavy user lasts, and how the determination is made. Is it a set time? Until congestion is gone? Recalculation is done after a certain period of time and things proceed from there on?


sturmvogel
Obama '08

join:2008-02-07
Houston, TX

reply to rexbinary
said by rexbinary See Profile :

SO glad I have FIOS. I couldn't deal with caps and throttling.
Do not forget the poor customer service, the outages and the menacing "abuse" department personnel.
--
Treason is a matter of dates


Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
·Comcast

said by sturmvogel See Profile :

said by rexbinary See Profile :

SO glad I have FIOS. I couldn't deal with caps and throttling.
Do not forget the poor customer service, the outages and the menacing "abuse" department personnel.
Good thing you don't have to worry about any of that anymore!


sturmvogel
Obama '08

join:2008-02-07
Houston, TX

said by Rob See Profile :

said by sturmvogel See Profile :

said by rexbinary See Profile :

SO glad I have FIOS. I couldn't deal with caps and throttling.
Do not forget the poor customer service, the outages and the menacing "abuse" department personnel.
Good thing you don't have to worry about any of that anymore!
I am glad that you have such a positive attitude regarding my state of affairs. Sorry to dissapoint you, but at two of my rental properties I still have Comcast and have to deal with them, so the "experience" continues.
--
Treason is a matter of dates


Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
·Comcast

said by sturmvogel See Profile :

I am glad that you have such a positive attitude regarding my state of affairs. Sorry to dissapoint you, but at two of my rental properties I still have Comcast and have to deal with them, so the "experience" continues.
I feel terrible.. for Comcast.


sturmvogel
Obama '08

join:2008-02-07
Houston, TX

said by Rob See Profile :

said by sturmvogel See Profile :

I am glad that you have such a positive attitude regarding my state of affairs. Sorry to dissapoint you, but at two of my rental properties I still have Comcast and have to deal with them, so the "experience" continues.
I feel terrible.. for Comcast.
You know, Rob, I usually do not walk away from a fight, but I do not wish to annoy the mods here so I will not pick up a fight with you.
--
Treason is a matter of dates


Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Boston, MA

reply to rexbinary
said by rexbinary See Profile :

SO glad I have FIOS. I couldn't deal with caps and throttling.
I'd much rather deal with a billing department that threatens my credit after overcharging me every month by 2-3x for a year despite calling in every month to have it "corrected."
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
-
Forums » US Cable Support » Comcast » Comcast HSI[Connectivity] Awful Speeds and Connectivity - Philadelphia, PA »
« Linksys CM100 Modem "Unlimited Provisioning"  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 ...11 · 12 · 13


Wednesday, 09-Dec 10:47:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [56] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [30] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Buzzing whatchamacallit in ceiling...?? Help identify. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· New PvE Content [World of Warcraft]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· Qs re: boosting WRT54G Wireless Signal Strength [TekSavvy]