Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Building a Better P2P » Must be open source!
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« No greedy companies!  

swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: Must be open source!

said by AstroBoy See Profile :

Must be open source! Or I will not trust it.

That would be a necessary condition for me too. But even if it's open source, if it's run by the ISP, it's still untrustworthy in my view, and will be closely monitored.

The more important question is about:

quote:
Will the system come with anti-piracy provisions and if so, will it create an ISP gatekeeper situation to wall off "non-sanctioned" P2P content?

That's probably the goal: make the p4p easy and fast, but it will have only the selection approved by the ISP and the copyright holders, and maybe laden with DRM, fees and whatnot.

Then they'll try to demonize regular p2p, implying that anything outside the approved application must be piracy. Then throttle, ban or otherwise interfere with regular p2p, based on a claim that p4p should be able to do everything the user wants.

Nerdtalker
Working Hard, Or Hardly Working?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-02-18
Tucson, AZ
clubs:

1 edit

Re: Must be open source!

I've heard about this P4P conglomerate before, and although I'm not sure whether it's OSS, they're very very reputable.

funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype

Re: Must be open source!

I think the process that they're taking is a bit "Rube Goldberg"-ish. I've talked to Laird Popkin at Pando about Open Source and he assures me that it will be Open Source. However, the ISP's data (the input that drives some of this behavior) might be closed or obfuscated somehow (I really haven't looked into that). Some ISPs are sensitive about competitors using the data to learn their secret recipe.

I still haven't taken a position on it, but my fears have gone from "be afraid, be very afraid" (especially concerning the who's who that is in the DCIA) to one of "as long as users will have free choice of applications and protocols, then this is just another market entrant and it will live and die on its own merits."

I am put off with the test results of 235% and 898%, since the results are not described in terms that can be independently reproduced. But that's just the technician in me.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
More features, more fun, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...

BIGMIKE
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Westminster, CA
p2p
FCC slaps Comcast, but lays foundation for future bandwidth restrictions »www.tgdaily.com/content/view/39002/128/
Forums » Building a Better P2P« No greedy companies!  


Wednesday, 02-Dec 19:50:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [161] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [93] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [79] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [54] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [38] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [37] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
Most people now reading
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Prevx says MS Nov 10 patches causing BSOD problems [Security]
· [WIN7] When exactly should you flash bios when installing new OS [Microsoft Help]
· [HD] hd updates for the Reading, Pa area [Comcast Cable TV]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Poll: Have you ever been charged an overage fee since ... [TekSavvy]
· Room heater [Canadian Chat]
· 16% packet loss. damn dsl. los angeles [AT&T West]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]