republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Other Connectivity » Business Connectivity » Dual WAN webserver failover/load Balance
Uniqs:
1406
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Wirless network for large apt. complex »
« loop pricing? what do i need to know about local loop?  

dalb

@rogers.com

Dual WAN webserver failover/load Balance

I have been trying to find the best way to accomplish my problem but cannot come up with the optimum way of accomplishing it.

What I would like to do is load balance (75% one IP and 25% another IP) a web server and have failover in case one connection dies all the traffic is routed to the other IP.

To sum up what the scenario is, we have a Sonicwall TZ 190 with one DSL connection which has a static IP and one Wireless connection that has a dynamic IP that really does not change but it could at any time. The DSL is configured to handle 75% of the outbound traffic with the remaining going out on the wireless. The domain name to the internal webserver is currently configured 75% to the DSL and 25% to the wireless but if the DSL cuts out then someone trying to access the site will roughly have to try and access the site 4 times before it actually connects to the internal server.

I have been looking at solutions like the software Simple Failover but I don't think that will allow me to load balance 75/25 the way I would like to.

any suggestions are welcome.

Thanks,
Daniel
aryoba
Premium,MVM
join:2002-08-22

Re: Dual WAN webserver failover/load Balance

If this is about Public access from The Internet to your web server, then in general there should be some BGP routing in place. Another approach is probably by using some Server Load Balance appliance like F5.

For "real" load balance, you can't just rely on software unfortunately

For some organizations, such solutions may not be financially attractive. When that is the case, you might want to consider co-location. With colo, the colo provider will take care all of those (among other things) with less headache and with less money to spend. You just need to move your server over their facility and tell them what you are trying to achieve.

dalb

@rogers.com

I am not familiar with BGP routing but I will look into that. Where can I find information on the Server Load Balance appliance? as for moving the appliance to another facility isn't an option because it is also the main server that runs the business management software. Also if the above are very expensive then those will most likely not be an option.

Thank you very much for your input.
geonap
lolatidiots

join:2005-12-14
Glendale, CA
google pfsense

it's good, freebsd based. awesome stuff.
Forums » Other Connectivity » Business ConnectivityWirless network for large apt. complex »
« loop pricing? what do i need to know about local loop?  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 02:33:42 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [57] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [47] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [33] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [28] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [24] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [21] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [3] Monday Morning Links
· [2] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Callcentric and 3-way calling [VOIP Tech Chat]