BUT - Levin does see 4G as being disruptive....

Forums » Broadband Competition: This Is As Good As It Gets » BUT - Levin does see 4G as being disruptive....


Uniqs: 49	Share Topic:	RSS topic:	toggle: flat / full normal / watch	Post a:	Post a:

« Wall Street Investors and Shareholders

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ

·Sprint Mobile Broa..

·Comcast

BUT - Levin does see 4G as being disruptive....

... and a competitive threat to wireline broadband.

Levin said 4G wireless rollouts in 2010 or 2012 could represent a significant change in the competitive landscape. “That is a far more significant competitive threat than I think people realize,” he said, adding that, for wireline providers feeling the sting of wireless substitution, “The worst, in wireless, is yet to come.”

And Levin could be a future FCC commissioner if Obama wins:

Levin, who is rumored to be a potential candidate for an FCC appointment should Barack Obama win the presidency

--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

permalink · 2008-08-22 10:29:18 · Print ·

mrchris We don't miss you Bush Premium join:2002-10-01 North Babylon, NY	Re: BUT - Levin does see 4G as being disruptive.... If he's not as bad as that prick Martin..
	permalink · 2008-08-22 10:52:00 ·

tschmidt Premium,MVM join:2000-11-12 Milford, NH ·Hollis Hosting ·Verizon Online DSL ·Fairpoint Communic..	Wireless is an attractive alternative to wired broadband were mobility is important and rural areas. In more populated locals there is not enough channel capacity to deliver really high speed (i.e. multi megabit per customer). Regardless: even with wireless a given area will have limited broadband competition because first-mile deployment cost is high relative to revenue potential. /tom
	permalink · 2008-08-22 13:12:42 ·

MrMoody
Carbon Based Lifeform

join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC

·Embarq

·Skype

·magicjack.com

Re: BUT - Levin does see 4G as being disruptive....

Correct on all three counts.

In order to get much wireless bandwidth per customer you have to be way up in the GHz so you have room for lots of channels. 700 MHz, white spaces, don't make me laugh. This also means it will take a lot of towers to get much coverage.

These physical constraints mean wireless will always be some compromise between cost and limitation, and wired will always be cheaper and less limited.
--
Electile Dysfunction: the inability to become aroused over the choice for President put forth by either party.

permalink · 2008-08-22 14:18:40 · Print ·

your comment..

Forums » Broadband Competition: This Is As Good As It Gets

« Wall Street Investors and Shareholders


Monday, 30-Nov 12:40:38	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF