<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Fine, so long as there is truth in advertising in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21002912</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:58:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:58:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Fine, so long as there is truth in advertising</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21002912</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1514516"><b>Dogfather</b></A> : Let them put the same FAP disclosures that sat providers have, including what in detail triggers a FAP, so people know what they're buying before hand.  <br><br>But FAPs & caps still don't make much sense.  If it's about network management the FAP system alone would handle it.  If there is no congestion within a particular cable system, there is no need to hammer uses with draconian network management.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21002912</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:08:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
