republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


ArgMeMatey

join:2001-08-09
Milwaukee, WI
kudos:1
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T Midwest
·voip.ms
·MyPhoneCompany

reply to ATT Vet

Re: Stick it to 'em

said by ATT Vet:

{1}Yes in a deflated housing market that the lenders and builders created lets hold ATT accountable.

{2}While we are at it how about a property tax refund for my house not selling for its assesed value?

{3}People I have talked to have chosen a neighborhood with a V-Rad over one that doesnt have those services availible so should those homeonwers give ATT part of their increased value?
I see your point, and acknowledge that my suggestions are all pie-in-the-sky, perfect-world stuff with virtually no chance of passage.

The idea is that AT&T needs to be ultra-sensitive when they could have a large negative effect on one property, despite the positive effect for all. They are exercising a power not unlike eminent domain, in which case elected officials must pay a fair price to take the affected person's property for the public good.

With that in mind:

1. The two have nothing to do with each other. The appraisal should make that clear if there VRAD is a line item in the comparables section.

2. That's an issue you should take up with your taxing authority, which is most likely under the control of your elected officials. If they are not doing what is fair and what you want, hold them accountable.

3. Presumably they would subscribe to AT&T services and in effect give AT&T a share of their "increased value".
--
USNG:
16TDN2870
Find your Lat-Long:
Geocoder

Wednesday, 30-May 17:00:30 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics