site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
920
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


BillRoland
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Ocala, FL
kudos:2

Taking too long

Its taking too long for Clearewire to build out coverage. AT&T and Verizon will be rolling out LTE across their footprint long before Clearwire is able to establish a competitive threat at the rate they're moving now.
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

There's a good possibility.
WiMAX may be able to deliver product, however, its been hype for so long now (few years?), that WiMAX will be not a direct competitor to LTE, but more of a niche service offering, which will probably not bring in the revenue needed.
The 'good' part is that WiMAX isn't a fixed service offering, and can be implemented for just about any purpose.
Kind of like a flexibility of bluetooh/WiFi, with range of cellular (if not better), but running in licensed airspace.
--
Canada = Hollywood North



fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

reply to BillRoland

said by BillRoland:

Its taking too long for Clearewire to build out coverage. AT&T and Verizon will be rolling out LTE across their footprint long before Clearwire is able to establish a competitive threat at the rate they're moving now.
Clearwire has some big money backers(Comcast, Intel, Google). The question is how long will they keep funding things if Clearwire doesn't move more quickly in establishing itself and signing up large numbers of customers. The stockholders for Comcast, Google, & Intel will start complaining to their boards if progress isn't made. They won't pump money down a rat hole for very long.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


BillRoland
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Ocala, FL
kudos:2

said by fAcEtIOUs:

said by BillRoland:

Its taking too long for Clearewire to build out coverage. AT&T and Verizon will be rolling out LTE across their footprint long before Clearwire is able to establish a competitive threat at the rate they're moving now.
Clearwire has some big money backers(Comcast, Intel, Google). The question is how long will they keep funding things if Clearwire doesn't move more quickly in establishing itself and signing up large numbers of customers. The stockholders for Comcast, Google, & Intel will start complaining to their boards if progress isn't made. They won't pump money down a rat hole for very long.
I have to agree, Clearwire better not be expecting too many more bailouts by the big guys, unless results show up fairly soon I think the investments are going to dry up pretty quick.
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."


a333
A hot cup of integrals please

join:2007-06-12
Rego Park, NY

reply to BillRoland
LTE? It's not even out of the labs yet innit? 'Least WiMax has been adopted in the real world...



MarkyD
Premium
join:2002-08-20
Oklahoma City, OK

reply to BillRoland

said by BillRoland:

Its taking too long for Clearewire to build out coverage. AT&T and Verizon will be rolling out LTE across their footprint long before Clearwire is able to establish a competitive threat at the rate they're moving now.
AT&T still hasn't managed to cover 1/2 the EVDO areas with 3g, so I wouldn't hold my breath on that one...

xenophon

join:2007-09-17

Say what? ATT doesn't even have 1/5 the 3G area coverage that Sprint and Verizon have.


xenophon

join:2007-09-17

reply to BillRoland
It's because Clearwire can't really make a move until the merger is approved. Once approved they absolutely must move fast and get WiMAX into as many markets as they can to get traction.


EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

The current Clearwire has spectrum assets of its own in some markets and could deploy at least in those areas before the merger.



MarkyD
Premium
join:2002-08-20
Oklahoma City, OK

reply to xenophon

said by xenophon:

Say what? ATT doesn't even have 1/5 the 3G area coverage that Sprint and Verizon have.
that was my point. I may have worded it poorly, I was saying that AT&T's 3g coverage is abysmal.


S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

reply to BillRoland
I don't see how they could possibly get a quick return on investment. The municipalities won't pony up for it, Americans are getting gouged across the board for services that are already being rendered. I just do not see it happening!
Nice avatar bill.
--
The "Lifetime" channel is responsible for 83% of all divorces...Robert Ginty


Wednesday, 30-May 10:32:12 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics