Real Threat? in

Real Threat? in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21009974 en Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:04:19 EDT Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:04:19 EDT Re: Real Threat? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21010320 en102 : I would tend to agree.. however, its much cheaper (and lawyers are already being paid for) to do the 'ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure' approach. I'm sure that Microsoft never saw Netscape as much of a threat either, but ran them bankrupt regardless, as it was 'the right thing to do'.
--
Canada = Hollywood North]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21010320 Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:07:41 EDT Re: Real Threat? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21010296 Mike_ :

said by skymax :

If the Clearwire/Sprint network was not a real threat, AT&T would just ignore them.

Couldn't have said that better ;)
They just need FCC approval is all. at&t the monopoly wanna-be is sweating seeing the enormous backing clearwire has and wants to slow it all down.

As to LTE - if you read about it, both wimax and lte stem from the same idea of connectivity, lte using 85% of what wimax has already been built on. Those supposed better speeds of LTE are of lab tests and of course not near real world speed as there isn't any yet.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21010296 Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:04:16 EDT Real Threat? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21009974 anon : If the Clearwire/Sprint network was not a real threat, AT&T would just ignore them. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21009974 Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:05:17 EDT