Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Cisco » [Config] Question about QoS Priority and Policing
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1628
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[HELP] Cisco Internet Suggestion Any One »
« [HELP] cme tftp  
AuthorAll Replies


Gramzster
Click, Click

join:2002-07-02
London, ON

[Config] Question about QoS Priority and Policing

Hey Everyone,
I have a QoS policy in place for our telecommuters, who have Cisco 871 routers and a 10/1 broadband connection. I have given priority to the Voice traffic and have everything shaped to 1000kbps to ensure that the speed-limiting of the broadband modem does not affect voice traffic. (speed tests have determined that all telecommuters can upload at least 1000kbps).

Everything works great, except for one thing: While developing the QoS policy, I enabled policing of class-default traffic to ensure there would always be bandwidth available for VoIP traffic. The Catch is that when a call is NOT being made, that remaining 250kbps remains unused due to the policing of 750kbps.

As I don't have the ability to fully saturate the upload portion of the broadband connection, if I were to remove the polcing, will the fair-queue and ramdom-detect still make sure that the VoIP traffic gets priority, yet allow all the bandwidth be used for applications when calls are being made?

Thanks!


cooldude9919

join:2000-05-29
Cape Girardeau, MO
clubs:


1 edit
I think you should be ok with taking out the police command and just give it a bandwidth statement(or not if you want no guaranteed minimum for class-default). With the tiered service-policy setup any one class should be able to use another classes bandwidth when there is free bandwidth, but when congestion occurs then every classs gets a miniumum equal to their bandwidth statement. Here is some of my qos setup.


It seems you also have the voice being priortiy which is good. I would give yourself some overhead because in every service i have messed with (cable/dsl/t1) you always get excess latency whenever you get at your max speed, which is why i limit it to 85% of the interface bandwidth. You could probably go up to 90% or 95% depending on the circuit.


Gramzster
Click, Click

join:2002-07-02
London, ON

Thanks a lot cooldude9919

Well, I've removed the policing commands and so far so good.

I actually remembered that I had a method of fully saturating my upload. I got a friend to watch my slingbox (which pretty much sucks every last kilobit of upload available if need be) and so far so good.

I modified the configs on the telecommuter routers. Worst case scenario, if they have call problems, I can easily revert it back.

Thanks again!
-
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Cisco[HELP] Cisco Internet Suggestion Any One »
« [HELP] cme tftp  


Thursday, 10-Dec 11:57:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [125] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [71] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [67] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [45] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Icecrown 5-man strats [World of Warcraft]
· Battered Hilt Delimma [World of Warcraft]
· New Mediacom Email [Mediacom]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· ICC10 [World of Warcraft]
· Will Gearscore die now? [World of Warcraft]
· 60GB would only last us two days! [TekSavvy]