Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Thanks Democrats For Telecom Immunity » AT&T ,,, your money, delivered to the fund raisers
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
"a slew of private corporate-sponsored parties" »
« Teh Two-Party system  
AuthorAll Replies
-

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to amigo_boy
Re: AT&T ,,, your money, delivered to the fund raisers

But what, about my post, didn't mention the extension of Constitutional protection, or control, or whatever you want to call it, to the states? Must I requote my comment?
quote:
...and, with one of the "Reconstruction" amendments, typically considered to apply to state governments, as well.

What did I miss, that I failed to convey exactly what you said I didn't?
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum


amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com

reply to NormanS
said by NormanS See Profile :

said by amigo_boy See Profile :

In 1866 the 14th amendment was passed to extend the Bill of Rights against state infringement...
Re: my remark about "Reconstruction amendments". Look that term up some time. There were three, of which 14 was one.
I'm very familiar with the 13th though 15th amendments. The 14th amendment was the one that extended the Bill of Rights to state (and by implication) private or organizational infringement. It's a matter of semantics because, although the 14th amendment didn't give the federal government jurisdiction over private/organizational infringement, it gave them jurisdiction over the state that didn't take action over such municipal, private or organizational infringement. It's indirect.

Mark

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to amigo_boy
said by amigo_boy See Profile :

In 1866 the 14th amendment was passed to extend the Bill of Rights against state infringement...
Re: my remark about "Reconstruction amendments". Look that term up some time. There were three, of which 14 was one.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum


amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com

reply to NormanS
said by NormanS See Profile :

"They" being whom? I don't think that anybody, except a government agency (i.e., the NSA), can "violate" an amendment. The U.S. Constitution, including its amendments, applies to the U.S. Government; and, with one of the "Reconstruction" amendments, typically considered to apply to state governments, as well.
That's not entirely true. You're right that the Bill of Rights originally was only a bar against Congressional infringement. In 1866 the 14th amendment was passed to extend the Bill of Rights against state infringement (who were essentially reinstituting slavery by denying rights to freed slaves, either by passage of "Jim Crow" laws, or simply turning a blind eye to private violence against blacks.

The intent of the framers of the 14th was to protect recently freed slaves from state laws recreating slavery. But, by implication it also extended to local laws (not nullified by the state), or private violence that went unpunished by state or local officials.

The intent of the 14th amendment wasn't recognized by the Supreme Court until the mid 1920s when they began what became known as "selective incorporation" of the Bill of Rights into the 14th amendment.

Mark
Forums » AT&T Thanks Democrats For Telecom Immunity"a slew of private corporate-sponsored parties" »
« Teh Two-Party system  


Saturday, 05-Dec 18:57:37 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [107] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]