| You can thank p2p We'll be seeing more of these caps.... |
|
|
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by ninjatutle:We'll be seeing more of these caps.... No, you can thank greedy corporations. If P2P was really the problem, they'd just boot the users.
--
Linux Haters Unite! |
|
| They are booting them and throttling. Or at least tried to until people started crying. Now everyone is suffering thanks to thieves. |
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by ninjatutle:They are booting them and throttling. Or at least tried to until people started crying. Now everyone is suffering thanks to thieves. 
--
Linux Haters Unite! |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 | reply to ninjatutle
Umm, P2P really doesn''t take that much data. Maybe about 2x as much as downloading direct from a given server, but...c'mon, 1GB can be used in a mobile environment VERY quickly. |
|
| reply to ninjatutle
I think p2p has very little to do with the capping of mobile data plans. Users are probably using their phones more than ever to browse websites and watch media on their phones... something that their plan wasn't initially set up for (email use). The wireless carriers don't want their service to be used as if they are an ISP, since their network is not built to be that. I think this is more of a move to stop people from using their phones as an internet connection for a house... rather than because of p2p usage. |
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by swhitney2003:I think p2p has very little to do with the capping of mobile data plans. Users are probably using their phones more than ever to browse websites and watch media on their phones... something that their plan wasn't initially set up for (email use). The wireless carriers don't want their service to be used as if they are an ISP, since their network is not built to be that. I think this is more of a move to stop people from using their phones as an internet connection for a house... rather than because of p2p usage. The user is being forced to downgrade because he admitted to watching YouTube videos. It's all in the thread linked in the article.
--
Linux Haters Unite! |
|
 dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18 | reply to Matt
said by Matt:said by ninjatutle:They are booting them and throttling. Or at least tried to until people started crying. Now everyone is suffering thanks to thieves. Even that is probably too complex for some to understand.
Ya know, I have about 250MB of cache that a few parts of could be considered "theft" by some people. 
Flog away, but it's not going to make a difference - they refuse to accept reality. 
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
| reply to Matt
Ever heard of theft of services?
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft_of_services
Theft of services is the legal term for a crime which is committed when a person obtains valuable services — as opposed to goods — by deception, force, threat or other unlawful means, i.e., without lawfully compensating the provider of said services. So it isn't as cut and dry as your diagram suggests. The english language is a complex thing. Here, like piracy, the emphasis of the word theft is on "using without paying" rather than "taking without paying." |
|
 hopeflickerCapitalism breeds greedPremium
join:2003-04-03
Long Beach, CA
kudos:1 | said by Millenniumle:Ever heard of theft of services? » en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft_of_servicesTheft of services is the legal term for a crime which is committed when a person obtains valuable services — as opposed to goods — by deception, force, threat or other unlawful means, i.e., without lawfully compensating the provider of said services. So it isn't as cut and dry as your diagram suggests. The english language is a complex thing. Here, like piracy, the emphasis of the word theft is on "using without paying" rather than "taking without paying." Last time i looked MOVIES, MUSIC, and APPLICATIONS were not a service. They are a product.
--
Religion does three things quite effectively: Divides people, Controls people, Deludes people. |
|
| Last time I read my post I pointed out that the emphasis was on "using without paying" rather than "taking without paying."
The concept of "using without paying" as theft has been in law long before P2P and well outside of RIAA & MPAA influence. |
|
| reply to Millenniumle
I'd expand that definition to include charging $75 (for those who haven't been caught going over a gig) & $65 (for those that have) for 1GB service.
This is either a case of taking advantage of the marketplace due to lack of competition, or they're in trouble (much like Frontier's actions). |
|
| reply to Millenniumle
the p2p argument is just an excuse to get away from the "unlimited" usage, and go to a much more profitable metered usage basis. You will see the carriers in this stange type of collusion when they don't have to be.
This is the anti-competition argument. When all companies pull the same sh*t, the consumer loses.
--
The "Lifetime" channel is responsible for 83% of all divorces...Robert Ginty |
|
 SLDPremium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA | reply to ninjatutle
How much do they pay you to bash P2P every chance you get LOL. |
|
| My payment is in the form of a promise of unlimited, unfilterated broadband for myself and for future generations to come. |
|
| said by ninjatutle:My payment is in the form of a promise of unlimited, unfilterated broadband for myself and for future generations to come. You are gullible. You actually believe that if piracy (which is not theft), didn't exist, that the ISPs wouldn't be doing things like this? Companies see their customers with any amount of expendable income, and do what ever they can to get it. Now days, instead of adding valued services to get users to spend more, they just take away what was already there, & up the price of what is left by 500%.
Welcome to the World! May we rape you?  |
|
| reply to Millenniumle
You said it correctly. However, If I stayed in a house and didn't pay rent, that would not be theft.
From the DICTIONARY : Main Entry: theft 1 a: the act of stealing; specifically : the felonious taking and removing of personal property with intent to deprive the rightful owner of it b: an unlawful taking (as by embezzlement or burglary) of property.
Piracy does not meet either of those terms, because NOTHING IS TAKEN. Ergo, it is not THEFT, it is infringement.
--
The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity! |
|
| Stealing = Taking something that aint yours. |
|
| But you didn't TAKE anything. You made a copy. If star trek replicators worked today, would you consider anything that was made with them to be stealing too? Absolutely not, because the original still exists.
--
The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity! |
|
| Maybe a 6 y/o would believe you. Did you make up these "theories" on your own? |
|
