Re: so? in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21017306 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:16:19 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:16:19 EDT Re: so? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21017306 PDXPLT :
said by nasadude See Profile :

sat broadband is still slow, expensive and has high latency.
But it's available just about anywhere. Which is alot more places then where cable or DSL is available (especially if you are in Verizon territory).]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21017306 Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:13:50 EDT so? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21008195 nasadude : sat broadband is still slow, expensive and has high latency.

but I guess now you're not stuck with expensive equipment when if real broadband comes around.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21008195 Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:46:29 EDT