<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: so?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-so-21008195</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:42:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:42:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-so-21017306</link>
<description><![CDATA[PDXPLT posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/489959" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=489959');">nasadude</a>:</small><br><br>sat broadband is still slow, expensive and has high latency. </div><b>But</b> it's available just about anywhere.  Which is alot more places then where cable or DSL is available (especially if you are in Verizon territory).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-so-21017306</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:13:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/so-21008195</link>
<description><![CDATA[nasadude posted : sat broadband is still slow, expensive and has high latency.<br><br>but I guess now you're not stuck with expensive equipment <strike>when</strike> if real broadband comes around.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/so-21008195</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:46:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

