<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Finally got around to checking my signal levels...&#x27; in forum &#x27;Comcast HSI&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21024442</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:46:34 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:46:34 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21030909</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : We upgraded our plant to 2.0 three weeks ago, not sure why since we're starting 3.0 soon, but meh.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cablemodem.com/primer/" >www.cablemodem.com/primer/</A><br><br>    *  DOCSIS 1.0 provides basic broadband Internet connectivity for one or more devices in the home. Among other things, it includes the ability to rate-limit (cap) a particular customer's data rate to a cable operator selected value.<br>    * DOCSIS 1.1 provides improved operational flexibility, security, and quality-of-service (QoS) features.<br>    * DOCSIS 2.0 includes increased upstream reliability and throughput for symmetric services.<br>    * DOCSIS 3.0 provides a number of enhancements, most notably, channel bonding, support for IPv6,and support for IPTV. Channel bonding provides cable operators with a flexible way to significantly increase downstream speeds to a minimum of 160 Mbps, and upstream throughput up to a minimum rate of 120 Mbps to customers.<br><br>Benefits<br><br>    * DOCSIS 1.0 cable modems made the interoperability of cable technology a reality for cable operators and cable subscribers.<br>    * DOCSIS 1.0 made the standardization of cable modems possible. As a result, placed downward pressure on cable modem prices causing them to drop from $500 to $50.<br>    * DOCSIS 1.1 enables the cable operator to configure guarantees on the data rates and/or the latency of the service.<br><b>    * DOCSIS 2.0 increases upstream throughput to 30 Mbps of capability.</b><br>    * DOCSIS 3.0 will allows cable operators to provide data rates in the hundreds of megabits and potentially gigabits per second.<br><br>Services Enabled<br><br>    * DOCSIS 1.0 provides the cable industry-platform the delivery of high-speed data on cable modems.<br>    * DOCSIS 1.1 paves the way for high-quality digital voice, interactive gaming, and commercial service level agreements (SLAs).<br><b>    * DOCSIS 2.0 increases upstream throughput resulting in an increase in the capacity to deliver high-speed data.</b><br>    * DOCSIS 3.0 will enables direct competition with VDSL and FTTx service offerings from the telcos, and will provides a platform for the evolution of the cable video business into IPTV.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21030909</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:37:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21029373</link>
<description><![CDATA[JTC posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1414214" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1414214');">EG</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1368956" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1368956');">gar187er</a>:</small><br><br>comcast doesnt run docsis 2.0<br> </div>I believe that they are using 2.0 and 3.0 in tandem for subs in areas that have the 50/5 service available. <br><br>2.0 being used for the upstream.</div>According to the business line page, the 50 down tier is 'coming soon' to my area.<br><br>I don't know pricing at this time, but wow, it's tempting.<br><br>Realistically, I doubt that I would upgrade to it.  After all, no one in the house is a big downloader and from what I've seen from work on the fat pipe (I've pulled just over a gig a second before), there are not many sites out there that can saturate a pipe that big.<br><br>But for geek cred, it's immeasurable.  :D<br><small>--<br>All hardware sucks, all software sucks, some just suck more than others</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21029373</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:53:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21029321</link>
<description><![CDATA[JTC posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1414214" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1414214');">EG</a>:</small><br><br>If the figure is accurate, that is an SNR TO DIE FOR !!</div>So I take it there is a chance that the modem is fibbing to me?  :)<br><br>That is a straight cut and paste from the status page of the SMC.<br><small>--<br>All hardware sucks, all software sucks, some just suck more than others</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21029321</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:48:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21029115</link>
<description><![CDATA[EG posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1368956" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1368956');">gar187er</a>:</small><br><br>comcast doesnt run docsis 2.0<br> </div>I believe that they are using 2.0 and 3.0 in tandem for subs in areas that have the 50/5 service available. <br><br>2.0 being used for the upstream.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21029115</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:19:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21029083</link>
<description><![CDATA[EG posted : If the figure is accurate, that is an SNR TO DIE FOR !!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21029083</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:15:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21028997</link>
<description><![CDATA[JTC posted : MOD: Actually, no, this wasn't really meant as a continuation of my first post to the forum, but I can make the two connect.  :)<br><br>daveinpoway: I apparently do have a stellar connection and I was very pleased when I took a look last night.<br><br>gar187er: Ah, I was not aware that they didn't use DOCSIS 2.  With all the talk about DOCSIS 3 and if/when/where it's being rolled out, I was under the impression that Comsys was using it.<br><br>For those who care regarding my first post (&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r20905533-Business-Less-than-stellar-install">[Business] Less than stellar install...</A>), I would like to thank Rob for the executive line TFN.  I called them and the next day I received a call from my local office, who after listing to my tale of woe, put a credit on my account which didn't get applied to my first bill (it also showed that I was past due for two months of service.  Yet another thing that I was never told about by sales) that I received today.<br><br>One call back to my contact had that fixed without any further delays.<br><br>With all things considered, overall I'm happy with the service and it looks like I'm going to be a Comcast customer for at least the next two years.<br><small>--<br>All hardware sucks, all software sucks, some just suck more than others</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21028997</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:03:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21027625</link>
<description><![CDATA[Johkal posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1368956" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1368956');">gar187er</a>:</small><br><br>comcast doesnt run docsis 2.0<br> </div>They do in ex-Adelphia areas.<br><small>--<br>Write me up a 125.......I Can't Drive 55   &raquo;<A HREF="http://redrocker.com/" >redrocker.com/</A>  &raquo;<A HREF="http://cabowabo.com/" >cabowabo.com/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21027625</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:39:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21025125</link>
<description><![CDATA[gar187er posted : comcast doesnt run docsis 2.0]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21025125</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:30:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21024592</link>
<description><![CDATA[daveinpoway posted : Your downstream signal/noise ratio is definitely excellent; you must have a really clean connection!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21024592</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:11:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Finally got around to checking my signal levels...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21024442</link>
<description><![CDATA[JTC posted : Downstream Channel<br>Downstream Frequency &#9;567000000 Hz<br>Lock Status &#9;Locked<br>Modulation &#9;256 QAM<br>Symbol Rate &#9;5.360537 Msym/sec<br>Downstream Power &#9;5.2 dBmV<br>SNR &#9;43.585 dB<br><br>Upstream Channel<br>Upstream Frequency &#9;25008000 Hz<br>Lock Status &#9;Locked<br>Modulation &#9;16QAM<br>Symbol Rate &#9;2560000 sym/sec<br>Upstream Power &#9;39.7 dBmV<br>Channel ID &#9;2<br><br>As far as I can tell from the FAQ, these values are <i>good</i>.  The only thing that makes me wonder is that the upstream appears to be DOCSIS 1.1.<br><br>Shouldn't a new business install (less than a month old) be using 2.0?<br><br><b>Mod Note:  Apparently continued from here ---> &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r20905533-Business-Less-than-stellar-install">[Business] Less than stellar install...</A> </b><br><br><small>--<br>All hardware sucks, all software sucks, some just suck more than others</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Finally-got-around-to-checking-my-signal-levels-21024442</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:35:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

