 1 edit | [POLL] Do you agree with Comcast's new AUP ?
Discussion of AUP is in this thread: »Comcast has new Acceptable Use Policy besides the 250GB cap |
|
 tshirtPremium,MVM join:2004-07-11 Snohomish, WA kudos:3 | so far it looks great to me (just skimmed it). The only thing I'd like them to add to the whole plan is some sort of offical useage meter (not that I'm ever near the cap, just want to know what THEY see). |
|
|
|
 | reply to fAcEtIOUs I agree with the disclosure of the cap.
I do not agree with the lack of a trustworthy meter and the many other loopholes in the one sided contract in which CC could disconnect a user for whatever reason they want.
A step forward ? Yes. -- Treason is a matter of dates |
|
 dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA kudos:18 | reply to fAcEtIOUs I agree with it! 
No problem here. |
|
 JohkalCool CatPremium,MVM join:2002-11-13 Happy Valley kudos:5 Reviews:
·Comcast
·Comcast Digital ..
| said by dadkins:I agree with it!  No problem here. Ditto! -- Write me up a 125.......I Can't Drive 55 »redrocker.com/ »cabowabo.com/ |
|
 funchordsHelloPremium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Yarmouth Port, MA kudos:5 | reply to sturmvogel said by sturmvogel:I agree with the disclosure of the cap. ... I voted No but I agree that it's a step toward better disclosure, and if you're going to have a cap, disclosure is one necessary element.
I think that's ultimately up to Comcast and how well they behave. Time will tell. -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon More features, more fun, Join BroadbandReports.com, it's free...
|
|
 wenter99Alpha MalePremium join:2003-12-09 Albuquerque, NM | reply to fAcEtIOUs I agree with it, and as long as I agree with it I'll keep Comcast.
If I ever have reason to disagree with the terms, I'll just go elsewhere, sans the rants. -- "Sometimes all you can do is just hunker down and take it, like a jackass caught out in a hail storm". LBJ |
|
 Unit649I B U, Who U B?Premium join:2000-01-22 Stockton, CA | reply to fAcEtIOUs I'm waiting to see if I get any more speed. I don't think I have any heavy downloaders on my node, but if I do, I guess after October 1 they won't be doing as much.
Or they might, and then.......
We shall see  |
|
 NerdtalkerWorking Hard, Or Hardly Working?Premium,MVM join:2003-02-18 Tucson, AZ | reply to fAcEtIOUs Even though satisfaction is split roughly 50-50 right now, I think that the majority of the changes largely make sense, or were already in place before they were officially recorded in this AUP refresh.
Honestly, the 250GB cap is nothing new. It always existed, now they're just being upfront about it. I disagree with it just as much as I did before, but I appreciate the transparency of what they're trying to do here by finally being upfront about this and not imposing a much more ominous glass cap.
I haven't perused the other changes, but there is just so much nonsense in the AUP which nobody ever takes note of (when's the last time you heard somebody get an abuse email because of running a server?) that I really don't care. -- "Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn
I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com Spam: 12900+ messages currently using 406 MB. |
|
 Anonymous_AnonymousPremium join:2004-06-21 127.0.0.1 kudos:2 | reply to fAcEtIOUs were is
i do not have comcast so i do not care?> |
|
 CableToolPoorly Representing MYSELF.Premium join:2004-11-12 | said by Anonymous_:were is i do not have comcast so i do not care?> Uh.. that option isnt there because this is the Comcast forum. There is an option to opt out of the poll however. Its called "NEXT THREAD" -- CableTechs.org/"Horrible People with Integrity" |
|
 jkj860The Final Frontier join:2002-01-10 Valparaiso, IN | reply to fAcEtIOUs No problem here. Business as usual. |
|
 CabalPremium join:2007-01-21 Austin, TX | reply to fAcEtIOUs Looks great, glad to see it. |
|
 | reply to fAcEtIOUs comcast high speed is so fast you can reach cap in no time. i guess that will be new commercial.. -- »www.thereligionofpeace.com/ |
|
 CabalPremium join:2007-01-21 Austin, TX Reviews:
·Suddenlink
| said by i1me2ao:comcast high speed is so fast you can reach cap in no time. i guess that will be new commercial.. When they increase the speed limits on the highway, does it mean you drive longer to work? -- Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru? |
|
 | huh?? |
|
 RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:2 | reply to i1me2ao said by i1me2ao:comcast high speed is so fast you can reach cap in no time. i guess that will be new commercial.. Faster speed =! reach caps faster. |
|
 | reply to fAcEtIOUs I have no problems with the cap. But they shouldn't suspend your account if you go over 250, they should just throttle it down so you can at least use it. They should also let you see exactly where you stand on your bandwidth usage for the month at all times. |
|
 | said by bondo :
I have no problems with the cap. But they shouldn't suspend your account if you go over 250, they should just throttle it down so you can at least use it. They should also let you see exactly where you stand on your bandwidth usage for the month at all times. You speak common sense and courtesy. Powers that be will disagree, as the AUP seems to imply. -- Treason is a matter of dates |
|
 pianotechPianotechPremium join:2002-12-30 New Castle, PA Reviews:
·Vonage
·Comcast
| reply to fAcEtIOUs I agree that the cap has always been in place; they're just being open about it now.
I'm sure I don't even come remotely close. I think though that they should give users who do go over the option of paying for the extra usage instead of suspending them. -- For a list of the ways technology has not made life better, please press 3. |
|