<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Comcast HSI&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21028326</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:07:55 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:07:55 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21512126</link>
<description><![CDATA[funchords posted : 22.6 GB -- but none of it on Comcast.  <br><br>Remember, "the typical user uses only 3 GB" so we're all pretty much hogs.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21512126</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:05:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21507811</link>
<description><![CDATA[dadkins posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/130499" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=130499');">Unit649</a>:</small><br><br>I figured this died a long time ago.<br><br>Still using WRT and its fine.  I found out, btw, if the power is lost to the router, you only lose that day of stats-the rest are written to memory.  How long that can happen before it runs out is anyones guess though.<br><br>November has been a banner month for me...34 GB!  OMG! :)<br> </div>Welcome my fellow bandwidth hog!  :D<br><br>33.4GB here.  :o<br><small>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21507811</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:15:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21507375</link>
<description><![CDATA[funchords posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/130499" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=130499');">Unit649</a>:</small><br><br>November has been a banner month for me...34 GB!  OMG! :)<br> </div>OINK!   :o :) :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21507375</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:50:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21507134</link>
<description><![CDATA[Unit649 posted : I figured this died a long time ago.<br><br>Still using WRT and its fine.  I found out, btw, if the power is lost to the router, you only lose that day of stats-the rest are written to memory.  How long that can happen before it runs out is anyones guess though.<br><br>November has been a banner month for me...34 GB!  OMG! :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21507134</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:43:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21505128</link>
<description><![CDATA[sortofageek posted : Thank you.  Useful new feature, IMO. I like Tomato as well, just noticed the upgrade yesterday.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21505128</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:23:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21505064</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rob posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1500901" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1500901');">Assman</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/460388" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=460388');">Rob</a>:</small><br><br>Yea, this is Tomato 1.22 (latest version). I found it to be more superior than DD-WRT.<br> </div>In what ways?<br> </div>I was referring to the bandwidth monitoring section, sorry.<br><br>Tomato is much faster, and the bandwidth monitoring section is more advance and easier to use/setup.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21505064</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:58:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21505053</link>
<description><![CDATA[Assman posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/460388" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=460388');">Rob</a>:</small><br><br>Yea, this is Tomato 1.22 (latest version). I found it to be more superior than DD-WRT.<br> </div>In what ways?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21505053</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:55:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21504912</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rob posted : Yea, this is Tomato 1.22 (latest version). I found it to be more superior than DD-WRT.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21504912?c=1375117&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTAyODMyNi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="353866 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=591 SRC="/r0/download/1375117.thumb600~aaa5bb5d48648a736a498dd66c6f289f/bw1.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21504912</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:16:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21504899</link>
<description><![CDATA[sortofageek posted : That is Tomato firmware, correct?  Have you installed the latest version, the one that keeps a rolling 30-day total?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="/faq/2913">Join Team Helix</a> * I am praying for these <A HREF="/faq/15254"> friends </a>.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21504899</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:14:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21504883</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rob posted : Too bad Comcast has not come out with a usage tool yet. I haven't heard anything from Comcast regarding the status of it.<br><br>So for now, I still use my router. Even after they release the tool, I will still use my router and "compare" the results.<br><br>It will be interesting. <br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.checksite.us"> CheckSite.us </a> | <A HREF="http://www.yourip.us"> YourIP.US </a></small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21504883?c=1375110&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTAyODMyNi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="82994 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=509 HEIGHT=227 SRC="/r0/download/1375110~30a48789fc382592c0804803b48c9ccb/bw.jpg"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21504883</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:09:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21179427</link>
<description><![CDATA[Unit649 posted : Just as an update:<br><br>I have been using NetMonitor as well as a DDWRT flash (found out I could do it with the new N router) a few days after.<br><br>So far I've used 22GB.  About what I expected.  I guess I'm good.  Even better, the router doesn't even get warm now at all, seems like.  Must be because of the new OS in the router.<br><br>Glad to see the thread helped a bunch of people including myself.  October 1 is coming soon.  Keep an eye on that cap, everyone :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21179427</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:46:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21151805</link>
<description><![CDATA[sansri88 posted : I don't think so...<br><br>I have Trendnet TEW-452BRP. That other meter works only with the 432BRP..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21151805</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:41:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21151796</link>
<description><![CDATA[sortofageek posted : Can you flash your router with DD-WRT?  If so, that would also monitor your network WAN bandwidth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21151796</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:39:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21151120</link>
<description><![CDATA[funchords posted : If your router "can collect and report bandwidth usage (if router supports SNMP or includes packet lengths in log records)" then try Wallwatcher.  <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://sonic.net/wallwatcher/" >sonic.net/wallwatcher/</A><br><br>Otherwise, you can get a router compatible with Tomato, or you can wait and see  if Comcast gets a customer-accessible meter out on time.  <br><small>--<br>Robb Topolski -= <A HREF="http://funchords.com/">funchords.com</a> =- Hillsboro, Oregon<br>More features, more fun, <i><A HREF="/join/new/">Join BroadbandReports.com</a></i>, it's free... <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21151120</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:25:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21151078</link>
<description><![CDATA[sansri88 posted : Is there anything out there that measures bandwidth usage on a network wide basis? I don't have a router compatible with Tomato so I can't use that, and Netmeter checks only one computer.<br><br>I don't want to have to install netmeter on all 5-6 of my computers. Plus I have 2 iPhones that use our network a lot.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21151078</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:19:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21150542</link>
<description><![CDATA[sortofageek posted : I still have NetMeter running.  Supposedly it is monitoring one of the six-seven computers currently running within my LAN.  The problems are:<br><br>1.  It monitors only one computer connection.<br>2.  It monitors not just the WAN traffic relevant to my Comcast connection, but also the local LAN traffic which Comcast should not care about.<br><br>                                                            <br><center>[att=1]</center><br><center>[att=2]</center><br><br>I am hoping, whatever Comcast provides for our use in monitoring, it will monitor WAN traffic only.                                                                                                             <br>   <br><small>--<br><A HREF="/faq/2913">Join Team Helix</a> * I am praying for these <A HREF="/faq/15254"> friends </a>.</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21150542?c=1352430&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTAyODMyNi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="53144 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=351 HEIGHT=360 SRC="/r0/download/1352430~75704aae8d1f4b1c5d843a61a4f01ba4/9-22-08%20NetMeter%20Daily.jpg"></A><br>One computer LAN + WAN</TD><TD ALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nowrap width="1%">&nbsp;</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21150542?c=1352431&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTAyODMyNi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="103063 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=581 SRC="/r0/download/1352431.thumb600~36ac0ae14d8b3d7fcb0f23db4ce59942/9-22-08 Tomato Daily.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>All network WAN traffic, excludes local LAN</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21150542</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:46:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21150434</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I was using NetMeter and it went buggy after it reached 100 GB projected, it started new month and listing totals for 1899. So now I'm trying DU Meter.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21150434</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:28:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21078287</link>
<description><![CDATA[Unit649 posted : I did go and flash the router with WRT yesterday.  Turns out the new N one works on it.<br><br>The only issue I see is that the stats are stored on it only until it loses power-so I'm keeping the stats on each computer also since those are stored.<br><br>So far it looks like I'm headed for a 34GB month, if the first weeks figures remain consistant....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21078287</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21076251</link>
<description><![CDATA[mardyron posted : I use the DU Meter [url]&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.dumeter.com/[/url]" >www.dumeter.com/[/url]</A>.. I been using it for quite sometime.  It works great & can create a spreadsheet of usage for daily/weekly/month usage.  I have it on all my PC's on my network.  This way I can monitor the b/w, not too mention it is a quick way to see if spyware is trying to send data...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21076251</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:02:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21074864</link>
<description><![CDATA[MxxCon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/937369" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=937369');">gglockner</a>:</small><br><br>does Cacti require me to always keep a computer powered on and running Cacti?</div>if you want consistent and accurate numbers, yes.<br>otherwise you'll have gaps in your data. if you have only 1 computer that is running it, the difference won't be big. but if this is one of many computers on your lan, your cacti numbers will be useless.<br>your def don't need to run cacti, especially since you couldn't even find a "cactu for dummies" tutorial. there are simpler to use packages around.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21074864</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:00:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21073926</link>
<description><![CDATA[gglockner posted : Hi, can someone point me to a Cacti for Dummies tutorial?  It's a pretty powerful system.  I've figured out how to connect it to my router (Apple Time Capsule) and grab its SNMP data, but I can't figure out how to create charts that actually track total bandwidth across the WAN port.  Furthermore, does Cacti require me to always keep a computer powered on and running Cacti?  Seems like it might be easier to pickup a Linksys router and load Tomato firmware.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21073926</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:11:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21068170</link>
<description><![CDATA[inferno posted : Comcast will monitor your upload as well... Look what the moderator said on the comcast forums:<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/581141" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=581141');">compton</a>:</small><br><br>For now the limit is only for downloads. <br> </div>You are wrong, check out the moderator's post from the comcast forum (his name is in red) <br><br> <IMG SRC="http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/4493/250gb20cap20what20abouthr7.jpg"> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21068170</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:12:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21067580</link>
<description><![CDATA[Homebrew1994 posted : I fear I am the only one in the world without a Linksys WRT54G router.<br><br>Does anyone have any ideas for other routers?<br>I have 2:<br>Belkin F5D6231-4 (an old 80211b I use as to extend range to some hard to the basement)<br>Netgear Rangemax WPN824 v2 (my main router)<br><small>--<br>My other cyber-pasttime, <A HREF="http://www.wheresgeorge.com">Where's George </a> <br> <A HREF="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21067580</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:38:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21064322</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rob posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by HR :</small><br><br>I've got the Buffalo 54 router that Tomato supports..but so far I'm just a wee bit fearful of flashing the firmware to install Tomato.<br><br>Can someone out there handhold me and tell me "its all gonna be alright!" :D   I'd be primarily doing it just for the bandwidth monitoring, but also the Quality of Service feature is awesome...being able to shape traffic.<br><br>I assume the Tomato firmware doesn't interfere with standard traffic like, say, passing a VPN signal or what have you....and is port forwarding (to pass, say, a NetMeeting signal) still supported without incident...<br> </div>It'll be ok. What I prefer to do, to ensure a successful flashing is, disconnect all devices from the router and leave only 1 computer hard wired to the router. I also disconnect the cable modem so the router has no Internet access.<br><br>Then (I use a Linksys), I assign my computer a static IP of 192.168.1.2 (The router is 192.168.1.1), with a subnet of 255.255.2550 and the gateway as the router (192.168.1.1).<br><br>The I flash the router with Tomato.<br><br>Been using it and have 0 problems! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21064322</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:36:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21064210</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I've got the Buffalo 54 router that Tomato supports..but so far I'm just a wee bit fearful of flashing the firmware to install Tomato.<br><br>Can someone out there handhold me and tell me "its all gonna be alright!" :D   I'd be primarily doing it just for the bandwidth monitoring, but also the Quality of Service feature is awesome...being able to shape traffic.<br><br>I assume the Tomato firmware doesn't interfere with standard traffic like, say, passing a VPN signal or what have you....and is port forwarding (to pass, say, a NetMeeting signal) still supported without incident...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21064210</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:20:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21060912</link>
<description><![CDATA[I pos rep posted : Put in the DD-WRT firmware in your router and use that. That is what I have been using to see my usage and it seems pretty good. Also the Tomato router firmware has such a feature I believe.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21060912</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:43:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21060747</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : Heh, getting worried now about bandwidth caps and such...<br><br>I now have an Asus wl500w but don't want to flash it to DD-WRT because it'll take too long to get back the functionality I have right now (USB drive connected acts like an FTP server). My question is whether I can just take my older WRT54G with DD-WRT on it and use it as a bandwidth meter or not. My worry is that the system will be double-wrouted (can I just bridge it?), and that the router in the middle will choke on all the P2P etc. connections like it did before. Also my worry is that it'll degrade the performance on the WAN connection. If these aren't the case I'll gladly go back to monitoring traffic with it between my new router and the cable modem.<br><br>Otherwise, does anyone know of a piece of Mac software that would allow me to do SNMP bandwidth monitoring? The wl500w does support that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21060747</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:40:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21058662</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1240208" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1240208');">lightzout</a>:</small><br><br>but macs just don't seem to like anything besides apple hardware<br> </div>Macs work fine with non-Apple hardware. <br><br>In fact, I've never owned any Apple networking hardware, no issues at all. It's all standards-based stuff. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21058662</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:10:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054906</link>
<description><![CDATA[lightzout posted : I am still wondering if there are any Mac apps for the apple routers.  I only use wireless for a macbook (my PC and xbox are hard wired) but macs just don't seem to like anything besides apple hardware.  So just wanted to see if anyone else uses an application for base stations.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054906</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:31:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054769</link>
<description><![CDATA[sortofageek posted : Yes, but that was only me (daughter away) on slow days.  I only watched one program each day (about an hour and a half each).  We can easily watch more on a lazy day with both at the computers.<br><br>Edit:  Anyway, my purpose in posting those was mainly to show the difference between what NetMeter monitors as opposed to a router firmware like Tomato.<br><br><small>--<br><A HREF="/faq/2913">Join Team Helix</a> * I am praying for these <A HREF="/faq/15254"> friends </a>.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054769</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:33:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054722</link>
<description><![CDATA[dadkins posted : even at 3.6GB total registered per day, that would make it 108GB per month.<br>Seeing as Tomato shows that as less, like just over 2GB per day, you're in the clear.  :)<br><small>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054722</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:19:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054656</link>
<description><![CDATA[sortofageek posted : There are a number of computers here, most with several Folding@Home clients.  My main box, the one being monitored by NetMeter, is continually monitoring those.  This is also a domain, not a workgroup, which may be the reason for more LAN traffic.<br><br>Anyway, here are the comparisons so far and these are actually slow days for us.  Daughter not around much and I have been outside quite a bit.<br><br>                                                            <br><center>[att=1]</center><br><center>[att=2]</center><br><br>                                                                                                           <br>       <br><small>--<br><A HREF="/faq/2913">Join Team Helix</a> * I am praying for these <A HREF="/faq/15254"> friends </a>.</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21054656?c=1346245&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTAyODMyNi54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="6519 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=363 HEIGHT=137 SRC="/r0/download/1346245~1c0ecac8c41eed687bb070e1a94f4cac/9-3-08%20NetMeter%20Daily.png"></A><br>One computer - LAN + WAN traffic</TD><TD ALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nowrap width="1%">&nbsp;</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21054656?c=1346246&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTAyODMyNi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="13053 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=253 SRC="/r0/download/1346246.thumb600~5c62421db17cf3edb29467ed0ae3ac15/9-3-08 Tomato Daily.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>WAN traffic only - entire domain</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054656</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:01:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054065</link>
<description><![CDATA[funchords posted : Here's the external site:  &raquo;<A HREF="http://getsatisfaction.com/comcast/topics/250gb_bandwidth_limit_with_no_way_to_monitor" >getsatisfaction.com/comcast/topi&middot;&middot;&middot;_monitor</A><br><br>The exchange goes like this:<br><div class="bquote"><div class="bquote">Comcast sets 250GB bandwidth cap without giving any way to check bandwidth usage? How is that legal? When can I expect Comcast will have a bandwidth monitoring tool available?<br><br>I know the FAQ tells you how to download a tool on a single computer and I know I can install 3rd party firmware to monitor all network traffic. That does not suffice. I need to know at any time what Comcast is reading on my internet usage so I can make internet usage choices accordingly.</div>Zane, to answer your question directly, I'm told that we are developing a suite of tools that will allow you to monitor your usage as you describe. As these come on line, we'll post the details.<br><br>Scott </div>And Scott Westerman is a big geek (meaning, he has a stellar reputation with me).  He wouldn't say that unless he had a high confidence that the company would come through.  <br><br>That said, we don't want tools that don't work or aren't ready -- which is why some companies won't talk about unreleased software.   I like Scott's approach better -- talk about what's being planned and just keep us posted.  Late is better than broken.<br><small>--<br>Robb Topolski -= <A HREF="http://funchords.com/">funchords.com</a> =- Hillsboro, Oregon<br>More features, more fun, <i><A HREF="/join/new/">Join BroadbandReports.com</a></i>, it's free... <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21054065</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:52:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21053830</link>
<description><![CDATA[dadkins posted : *HERE* the small amount of LAN traffic I do is accountable.<br>The rare movie transfer(*NOT* Blu-ray!).<br>So, when I see a total upload exceeding the normal 6-12, I know some of it is LAN traffic.<br>See pic.<br><br>Take the received and add 10, maybe 12 - that is usually what I do for WAN total. Anything else is LAN.<br><small>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a></small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21053830?c=1346214&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTAyODMyNi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="149325 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=362 SRC="/r0/download/1346214.thumb600~0616cbe1fce385cdcd5d28bb93d8cec7/ScreenShot026.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>Main laptop</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21053830?c=1346219&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTAyODMyNi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="188029 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=365 SRC="/r0/download/1346219.thumb600~08c5d2ea6acdf96e72e2ab2114a4f29b/ScreenShot002.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>Server/storage laptop - 95% LAN</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21053830</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:06:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21053761</link>
<description><![CDATA[EG posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/455626" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=455626');">sortofageek</a>:</small><br><br><small><small>OT and no reply requested: Wondering if you'll all be model forum citizens if I get kicked off and it takes time to switch to FiOS.</small></small>  ;)<br> </div>BUWAHAHAHAHAHA.......  :o  :o  :p  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21053761</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:51:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21053740</link>
<description><![CDATA[AVonGauss posted : Thank you, as I said, I was probably just being blind last night - skipped right over the links in the post.  Thanks again.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21053740</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:47:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21053077</link>
<description><![CDATA[KevTech posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1499612" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1499612');">AVonGauss</a>:</small><br><br>I am probably just being blind and missed it, but where abouts on their forum did you see the post?</div>Post made by ZaneP where he mentions another forum and a post made by Comcast rep Scott Westerman.<br><br><A HREF="http://forums.comcast.net/comcastsupport/board/message?board.id=29&thread.id=15928&view=by_date_ascending&page=3">Just announced ( and pulled back down) Data Caps</a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21053077</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:44:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21051610</link>
<description><![CDATA[sortofageek posted : I installed NetMeter on my main box on the 1st and also flashed the BIOS on my Linky WRT54GS to Tomato V.1.21 firmware.<br><br>NetMeter is obviously monitoring all traffic on my NIC w/o discriminating between local network and internet.  I'm seeing about 3 times as much bandwidth reported on that one NIC via NetMeter than Tomato is showing for the entire domain (WAN only).<br><br><small><small>I decided, finally, to start monitoring since it would be embarrassing to be periodically unable to moderate the CC Forum because CC had throttled me. </small></small>  And, before someone asks, I am not interested in downloading those pics some of you fellows like and I am not a thief.  We do hold a couple of subscriptions to netflix.com and daughter has a season pass to watch shows via Amazon.  There are also a couple of TechNet Plus subscriptions (download only) in this household.<br><br>Now that I can monitor bandwidth on the WAN, I can see how it would be possible for us to top that 250GB limit.  Not likely, but entirely possible.<br><br>Anyway, I can't see how NetMeter can be useful for monitoring internet useage, even though I am also not confident my monitoring using the router firmware will be comparable to whatever means of monitoring Comcast has.  :(<br><br><small><small>OT and no reply requested: Wondering if you'll all be model forum citizens if I get kicked off and it takes time to switch to FiOS.</small></small>  ;)<br><small>--<br><A HREF="/faq/2913">Join Team Helix</a> * I am praying for these <A HREF="/faq/15254"> friends </a>.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21051610</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:14:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21051579</link>
<description><![CDATA[MxxCon posted : there is no transparency. it's not really intended to be "always on top" all the time, but rather running unobtrusively in the background taking up as little memory as possible and counting your bytes. when you want to see your bandwidth graph, you open it up. i have it configured to be full width of my screen in the lower part of the screen, about 300px high. with graph rate of every 5sec i can see traffic overview for the last hour. if i want to see further back, i enable "browse" mode.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21051579</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:09:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21051551</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nerdtalker posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1272455" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1272455');">bjy207166</a>:</small><br><br>So Tomato only works on WRT54G Version 1 - 4?  <br><br>Do you have to ad anything on to get bandwidth monitoring in the DDWRT Micro?<br> </div>And the GS.<br><br># Linksys WRT54G v1-v4, WRT54GS v1-v4, WRT54GL v1.x, WRTSL54GS (no USB support) <br><br>It's almost all the same hardware that DD-WRT supports, granted DD-WRT supports more. Not sure about DDWRT micro, but I'm sure you can get something together.<br><small>--<br>"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn<br><br>I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com<br><b>Spam: 12900+</b> messages currently using 406 MB.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21051551</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:04:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21051532</link>
<description><![CDATA[Lex Luthor posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/118623" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=118623');">MxxCon</a>:</small><br><br>Check out RASG&S from the developer of FlashFXP<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://trvx.com/rasgs/" >trvx.com/rasgs/</A><br>(new, better looking version with less memory will be released in a few hours.)<br> </div>I see the new version is there now.  I tried it quickly, but I think it's pretty ugly compared to the free NetMeter.   The window is just a lot more bulky and I don't see any transparency options.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21051532</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:00:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049936</link>
<description><![CDATA[bjy207166 posted : So Tomato only works on WRT54G Version 1 - 4?  <br><br>Do you have to ad anything on to get bandwidth monitoring in the DDWRT Micro?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049936</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:03:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049624</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rod P5 posted : <strong><u>For Mac OS X Users</u></strong><br><br><A HREF="http://freespace.virgin.net/jeremy.dronfield/skoobysoft/skooby/products.html"><b>SurplusMeter </b></a> and a minimum of OS X 10.4.4 will give you what you need, in a simple small business or home office setup.<br>FWIW,<br>-Rod]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049624</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:49:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049575</link>
<description><![CDATA[MxxCon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/203272" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=203272');">Lex Luthor</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/118623" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=118623');">MxxCon</a>:</small><br><br>Check out RASG&S from the developer of FlashFXP<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://trvx.com/rasgs/" >trvx.com/rasgs/</A><br>(new, better looking version with less memory will be released in a few hours.)<br> </div>Interesting, I've never seen this one posted.  How's it compare with the free NetMeter?  This one hasn't been updated in over a year, do you really know a new update is coming?  I don't even see anything in their forums about a new version.<br> </div>I've been using rasgs since 2002 and i have my <b>daily</b> bandwidth stats from back then :)<br>I'm talking to bigstar(developer of flashfxp and this rasgs) on daily basis. right now i'm using v1.42 with new graph drawing algorithm. I'm trying to poke him to upload this new version on the website :)<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21049575?c=1345960&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTAyODMyNi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="25639 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=527 SRC="/r0/download/1345960.thumb600~b44da42edae7423cf10d37cb085054ab/Clipboard01.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049575</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:36:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049551</link>
<description><![CDATA[fuziwuzi posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/772729" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=772729');">Nerdtalker</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1227273" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1227273');">fuziwuzi</a>:</small><br><br>I'm curious as to why would you buy this router from T-Mobile and not use the voice features?  Having the SIM card(s) and voice capability is the whole point of this router.  Otherwise you could just go buy a regular Linksys.<br> </div>I didn't buy it from T-Mobile. <br><br>The reason I did purchase it, however, is because it has (as I've already noted), double the RAM and double the ROM of the normal WRT54G, even the GS. That's a ton of extra space that makes it run faster and support even more feature-rich firmwares than the other stock WRT54GLs. I couldn't care less about telephony and voice features, especially since I have Sprint; I'm just in it because for $70 on eBay you can get one custom modded with a JTAG, heatsink, PoE modifications, pre-flashed, and with the double RAM and ROM. That's a killing compared to how much a new GL costs.<br><br>That's why. <br><br>Regardless, it's amazingly well suited for bandwidth monitoring like this with Tomato. <br> </div>That makes sense, then.  I bought mine from T-Mobile to use the @Home service.  So far I'm VERY impressed, the voice quality is on par with landlines.  Even when I'm doing some heavy downloading the voice quality never falters (it does automatic QOS for the voice service).  I have the standard Comcast 6/1 service and have my desktop computer hardwired to the router.  I have my TiVO connecting to the router wirelessly using the 802.11g service.  And with a DECT6.0 cordless handset system connected to the POTS jack on the router, I get phone service throughout my apartment.<br><br>I just wish Linksys would let the router's log be accessed by a computer on the internal network.  That could make keeping up with the data much easier.<br><small>--<br>***************<br>I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.<br>  - Stephen Hawking</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049551</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:26:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049392</link>
<description><![CDATA[Lex Luthor posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/147171" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=147171');">bryank</a>:</small><br><br>I have a linksys wrt54g router, have the DD-WRT firmware installed, and use a program called RFlow Collector to monitor my bandwidth on my network.  Works really nice once set up. <br> </div>Can RFlow Collector work with Tomato too or is there something else that I can run on one PC that pulls the data from Tomato?<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/118623" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=118623');">MxxCon</a>:</small><br><br>Check out RASG&S from the developer of FlashFXP<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://trvx.com/rasgs/" >trvx.com/rasgs/</A><br>(new, better looking version with less memory will be released in a few hours.)<br> </div>Interesting, I've never seen this one posted.  How's it compare with the free NetMeter?  This one hasn't been updated in over a year, do you really know a new update is coming?  I don't even see anything in their forums about a new version.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049392</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 06:57:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049213</link>
<description><![CDATA[Movieman420 posted : I was using NetLimiter 2 Pro before the hard cap was declared...nice thing is that it monitors all processes and it counts network traffic and net traffic separate. Bad thing is it needs to be on all pcs using the connection. Great program tho...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21049213</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:50:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21048870</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nerdtalker posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1227273" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1227273');">fuziwuzi</a>:</small><br><br>I'm curious as to why would you buy this router from T-Mobile and not use the voice features?  Having the SIM card(s) and voice capability is the whole point of this router.  Otherwise you could just go buy a regular Linksys.<br> </div>I didn't buy it from T-Mobile. <br><br>The reason I did purchase it, however, is because it has (as I've already noted), double the RAM and double the ROM of the normal WRT54G, even the GS. That's a ton of extra space that makes it run faster and support even more feature-rich firmwares than the other stock WRT54GLs. I couldn't care less about telephony and voice features, especially since I have Sprint; I'm just in it because for $70 on eBay you can get one custom modded with a JTAG, heatsink, PoE modifications, pre-flashed, and with the double RAM and ROM. That's a killing compared to how much a new GL costs.<br><br>That's why. <br><br>Regardless, it's amazingly well suited for bandwidth monitoring like this with Tomato. <br><small>--<br>"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn<br><br>I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com<br><b>Spam: 12900+</b> messages currently using 406 MB.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21048870</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:51:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21048858</link>
<description><![CDATA[AVonGauss posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/676869" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=676869');">KevTech</a>:</small><br><br>I just read on the Comcast forums that the company is developing a suite of tools to monitor usage. <br>Hopefully at the modem level. <br>Whether or not they will be done by October 1st I do not know.<br> </div>I am probably just being blind and missed it, but where abouts on their forum did you see the post?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Monitor-for-ComputersSuggestions-21048858</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:47:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
