| Thanks for getting back on topic jester.
Yeah I was trying to imply the Judges were a bit smarter, but not really because they could read. Anyone could probably go through and read a TOS but most of us are not sure of all the technical lingo, even if we COULD read in the first place.
--
The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. |
Reviews:
 ·AT&T Wireless Br..
| reply to jester121
Jester: actually, the LSAT worked out just fine for me, I don't remember my score, but it was sufficient to get admitted to law school, I graduated in 1968 with a Juris Doctorate (but you don't have to call me Dr.) and then passed the NY Bar Exam (reportedly one of the toughest in the nation) on my first shot. While I no longer practice law, I still regard the whole experience as a valuable lesson in reading comprehension. Does that answer your question?
It seems to me you're not making the distinction between reading something and comprehending what you have read. I'm not here to defend or accuse judges in general, but the mere fact that they went through all this process would seem to give them a leg-up on comprehension, although there are many instances where this seems to have been disregarded. One can have training and still not use it in certain situations.
Please don't take any part of this as a personal flame. I don't play that game and have been known to issue 'knock it off' statements to those who do. This is just a forum for ideas and we all want to keep it that way.
--
Franklin CDU680/Assent MBR400 combo, CAY1912 panel antenna, Millenicom, 4 XPPro stations, Mozilla everywhere. |
·
