Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Wireless VoIP May Improve with New Wireless Standard » Did they ever finish N?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
82
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
N Stands for Not Ready Yet »
AuthorAll Replies


Camelot One
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-21
Sarasota, FL
clubs:

Did they ever finish N?

Maybe I missed that press release, but I didn't think they had even officially finished N, now they expect everyone will just up and replace gear with another new "standard" that isn't a standard?
--
Intel Q6600 @3400Mhz/GA-EP35-DS3P/2x 2048Mb G.Skill/Seagate 750.10/EVGA 8800GT's SLI/Silverstone 850W/Custom water cooler


GOLFnSUN
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


3 edits
N approval isn't expected till late 2009.

»www.betanews.com/article/80211r_···20028892
the final publication of 11n may not come sooner than November 2009.


S_engineer

join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL
·Comcast

reply to Camelot One
i Played with first edition N routers...liked the signal but it had too many bugs for me to implement with trust. Plus the fact that it had alot of difficulty with my wi-fi print server made me put it back in the box. I've went back to G ever since.
--
The "Lifetime" channel is responsible for 83% of all divorces...Robert Ginty


moon1234

@charter.com

reply to Camelot One
This is just the industry bodies answer to Cisco's CCKM mothod of caching and reusing the PMK negotiated when you first authenticate to an access point.

These technologies have actually been around several years and are already in use. You may have heard of pre-authentication and pair-wise master key caching already. These allow fast roaming by having the client pre-authenticate to a new access point before dis-associating with the current one. The PMK is then cached and allows the client to quickly move to another access point. without having interruptions in the wireless link.

With Cisco, this process is done by the access points or wireless lan controller on behalf of the clients. The downside is that all access points must be Cisco access points. Other vendors have similar implementations.

All this standard is looking to do is open fast roaming between different vendors equipment. Mush of the work is done and already in use in Windows XP, Windows Vista and most newer access points and home routers. Current access points without this support will require a firmware upgrade. This will be up to the vendor to supply to thier customers. Many consumer vendors may use this as a way to push customers to new equipment. Corporate suppliers, Cisco and company, will offer firmware upgrades for currently shipping models when the standard is ratified.
-
Forums » Wireless VoIP May Improve with New Wireless StandardN Stands for Not Ready Yet »


Tuesday, 10-Nov 00:04:36 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [82] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [77] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [21] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [13] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [10] Monday Morning Links
· [9] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [5] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
Most people now reading
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· How in the world am I going to get into college? [General Questions]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· Massive Slowdowns? [cover,1584]
· Blown out Ballasts [Home Repair & Improvement]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· [SU] Apple Releases Mac OS X 10.6.2 [All Things Macintosh]