<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>N Stands for Not Ready Yet in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21036150</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:15:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:15:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: N Stands for Not Ready Yet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21041067</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/121095"><b>RARPSL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Mr Matt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1524524"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> :o What better way for the wireless network industry to weasel the consumer into replacing their hardware every six months. By not having a final standard for 802.11n and changing the preliminary standards on a regular basis one must replace their hardware regularly in order to have the fastest throughput. Last months N client may not work with next months N access point.<br> </div>That depends on if the device needs an upgraded/replacement chip or if the use of a microcode flash will do the upgrade to the standard. So long as you can just use a microcode upload (as you can for your router) the device can be easily made compatible with the updated/revised standard as it evolves.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21041067</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:21:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: N Stands for Not Ready Yet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21039207</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1212505"><b>bigfitch</b></A> : I went to Wireless N and have had yet to have any problems. All of my systems except my xbox360's are wireless N and work flawless.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21039207</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:30:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: N Stands for Not Ready Yet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21038654</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/918894"><b>Lowtarget</b></A> : I'm sticking with G standard for now. Maybe when N becomes standard and ages a few years. Then maybe I'll upgrade.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21038654</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:27:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>N Stands for Not Ready Yet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21036150</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1524524"><b>Mr Matt</b></A> :  :o What better way for the wireless network industry to weasel the consumer into replacing their hardware every six months. By not having a final standard for 802.11n and changing the preliminary standards on a regular basis one must replace their hardware regularly in order to have the fastest throughput. Last months N client may not work with next months N access point.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21036150</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:30:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
