<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: and  we have to foot the bill in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21043590</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:18:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:18:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: and  we have to foot the bill</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21043590</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : nope cause tmo said it was going to cause interf. what i dont understand how someone would say it was going to do this, when most cell carriers use the 900MHz to 1900Mhz spec, the signals should travel through the air right next toeach other with no issues]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21043590</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:53:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>and  we have to foot the bill</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21034828</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/750935"><b>mustang03282</b></A> : so the  fcc    makes  the money   off selling a 25MHz piece of the Advanced Wireless Service spectrum   but  us  tmobile  customers  have to foot the  bill for them to  do the  test   first.    Does  anyone els  see  something wrong  with this?  If  the  fcc  wants  to  sell   something shouldn't  they  have to pay for the test?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21034828</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:11:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
